Cargando…
Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AlphaMed Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702129 http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064 |
_version_ | 1782412271382691840 |
---|---|
author | Duscher, Dominik Atashroo, David Maan, Zeshaan N. Luan, Anna Brett, Elizabeth A. Barrera, Janos Khong, Sacha M. Zielins, Elizabeth R. Whittam, Alexander J. Hu, Michael S. Walmsley, Graham G. Pollhammer, Michael S. Schmidt, Manfred Schilling, Arndt F. Machens, Hans-Günther Huemer, Georg M. Wan, Derrick C. Longaker, Michael T. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. |
author_facet | Duscher, Dominik Atashroo, David Maan, Zeshaan N. Luan, Anna Brett, Elizabeth A. Barrera, Janos Khong, Sacha M. Zielins, Elizabeth R. Whittam, Alexander J. Hu, Michael S. Walmsley, Graham G. Pollhammer, Michael S. Schmidt, Manfred Schilling, Arndt F. Machens, Hans-Günther Huemer, Georg M. Wan, Derrick C. Longaker, Michael T. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. |
author_sort | Duscher, Dominik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31−/CD45−), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. SIGNIFICANCE: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4729547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | AlphaMed Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47295472016-08-01 Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Duscher, Dominik Atashroo, David Maan, Zeshaan N. Luan, Anna Brett, Elizabeth A. Barrera, Janos Khong, Sacha M. Zielins, Elizabeth R. Whittam, Alexander J. Hu, Michael S. Walmsley, Graham G. Pollhammer, Michael S. Schmidt, Manfred Schilling, Arndt F. Machens, Hans-Günther Huemer, Georg M. Wan, Derrick C. Longaker, Michael T. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. Stem Cells Transl Med Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31−/CD45−), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. SIGNIFICANCE: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy. AlphaMed Press 2016-02 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4729547/ /pubmed/26702129 http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064 Text en ©AlphaMed Press |
spellingShingle | Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Duscher, Dominik Atashroo, David Maan, Zeshaan N. Luan, Anna Brett, Elizabeth A. Barrera, Janos Khong, Sacha M. Zielins, Elizabeth R. Whittam, Alexander J. Hu, Michael S. Walmsley, Graham G. Pollhammer, Michael S. Schmidt, Manfred Schilling, Arndt F. Machens, Hans-Günther Huemer, Georg M. Wan, Derrick C. Longaker, Michael T. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title | Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title_full | Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title_short | Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells |
title_sort | ultrasound-assisted liposuction does not compromise the regenerative potential of adipose-derived stem cells |
topic | Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702129 http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duscherdominik ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT atashroodavid ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT maanzeshaann ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT luananna ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT brettelizabetha ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT barrerajanos ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT khongsacham ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT zielinselizabethr ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT whittamalexanderj ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT humichaels ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT walmsleygrahamg ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT pollhammermichaels ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT schmidtmanfred ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT schillingarndtf ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT machenshansgunther ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT huemergeorgm ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT wanderrickc ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT longakermichaelt ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells AT gurtnergeoffreyc ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells |