Cargando…

Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duscher, Dominik, Atashroo, David, Maan, Zeshaan N., Luan, Anna, Brett, Elizabeth A., Barrera, Janos, Khong, Sacha M., Zielins, Elizabeth R., Whittam, Alexander J., Hu, Michael S., Walmsley, Graham G., Pollhammer, Michael S., Schmidt, Manfred, Schilling, Arndt F., Machens, Hans-Günther, Huemer, Georg M., Wan, Derrick C., Longaker, Michael T., Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AlphaMed Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702129
http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064
_version_ 1782412271382691840
author Duscher, Dominik
Atashroo, David
Maan, Zeshaan N.
Luan, Anna
Brett, Elizabeth A.
Barrera, Janos
Khong, Sacha M.
Zielins, Elizabeth R.
Whittam, Alexander J.
Hu, Michael S.
Walmsley, Graham G.
Pollhammer, Michael S.
Schmidt, Manfred
Schilling, Arndt F.
Machens, Hans-Günther
Huemer, Georg M.
Wan, Derrick C.
Longaker, Michael T.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
author_facet Duscher, Dominik
Atashroo, David
Maan, Zeshaan N.
Luan, Anna
Brett, Elizabeth A.
Barrera, Janos
Khong, Sacha M.
Zielins, Elizabeth R.
Whittam, Alexander J.
Hu, Michael S.
Walmsley, Graham G.
Pollhammer, Michael S.
Schmidt, Manfred
Schilling, Arndt F.
Machens, Hans-Günther
Huemer, Georg M.
Wan, Derrick C.
Longaker, Michael T.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
author_sort Duscher, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31−/CD45−), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. SIGNIFICANCE: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4729547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AlphaMed Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47295472016-08-01 Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Duscher, Dominik Atashroo, David Maan, Zeshaan N. Luan, Anna Brett, Elizabeth A. Barrera, Janos Khong, Sacha M. Zielins, Elizabeth R. Whittam, Alexander J. Hu, Michael S. Walmsley, Graham G. Pollhammer, Michael S. Schmidt, Manfred Schilling, Arndt F. Machens, Hans-Günther Huemer, Georg M. Wan, Derrick C. Longaker, Michael T. Gurtner, Geoffrey C. Stem Cells Transl Med Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently become a focus of regenerative medicine, both for their multilineage differentiation capacity and their excretion of proregenerative cytokines. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are of particular interest because of their abundance in fat tissue and the ease of harvest via liposuction. However, little is known about the impact of different liposuction methods on the functionality of ASCs. Here we evaluate the regenerative abilities of ASCs harvested via a third-generation ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) device versus ASCs obtained via standard suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL). Lipoaspirates were sorted using fluorescent assisted cell sorting based on an established surface-marker profile (CD34+/CD31−/CD45−), to obtain viable ASCs. Yield and viability were compared and the differentiation capacities of the ASCs were assessed. Finally, the regenerative potential of ASCs was examined using an in vivo model of tissue regeneration. UAL- and SAL-derived samples demonstrated equivalent ASC yield and viability, and UAL ASCs were not impaired in their osteogenic, adipogenic, or chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Equally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction showed comparable expression of most osteogenic, adipogenic, and key regenerative genes between both ASC groups. Cutaneous regeneration and neovascularization were significantly enhanced in mice treated with ASCs obtained by either UAL or SAL compared with controls, but there were no significant differences in healing between cell-therapy groups. We conclude that UAL is a successful method of obtaining fully functional ASCs for regenerative medicine purposes. Cells harvested with this alternative approach to liposuction are suitable for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications. SIGNIFICANCE: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are an appealing source of therapeutic progenitor cells because of their multipotency, diverse cytokine profile, and ease of harvest via liposuction. Alternative approaches to classical suction-assisted liposuction are gaining popularity; however, little evidence exists regarding the impact of different liposuction methods on the regenerative functionality of ASCs. Human ASC characteristics and regenerative capacity were assessed when harvested via ultrasound-assisted (UAL) versus standard suction-assisted liposuction. ASCs obtained via UAL were of equal quality when directly compared with the current gold standard harvest method. UAL is an adjunctive source of fully functional mesenchymal stem cells for applications in basic research and clinical therapy. AlphaMed Press 2016-02 2015-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4729547/ /pubmed/26702129 http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064 Text en ©AlphaMed Press
spellingShingle Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Duscher, Dominik
Atashroo, David
Maan, Zeshaan N.
Luan, Anna
Brett, Elizabeth A.
Barrera, Janos
Khong, Sacha M.
Zielins, Elizabeth R.
Whittam, Alexander J.
Hu, Michael S.
Walmsley, Graham G.
Pollhammer, Michael S.
Schmidt, Manfred
Schilling, Arndt F.
Machens, Hans-Günther
Huemer, Georg M.
Wan, Derrick C.
Longaker, Michael T.
Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title_full Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title_short Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
title_sort ultrasound-assisted liposuction does not compromise the regenerative potential of adipose-derived stem cells
topic Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26702129
http://dx.doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0064
work_keys_str_mv AT duscherdominik ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT atashroodavid ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT maanzeshaann ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT luananna ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT brettelizabetha ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT barrerajanos ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT khongsacham ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT zielinselizabethr ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT whittamalexanderj ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT humichaels ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT walmsleygrahamg ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT pollhammermichaels ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT schmidtmanfred ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT schillingarndtf ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT machenshansgunther ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT huemergeorgm ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT wanderrickc ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT longakermichaelt ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells
AT gurtnergeoffreyc ultrasoundassistedliposuctiondoesnotcompromisetheregenerativepotentialofadiposederivedstemcells