Cargando…

Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers

OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to investigate radiology practitioners’ and radiographers’ radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging examinations. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers working...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Portelli, Jonathan L., McNulty, Jonathan P., Bezzina, Paul, Rainford, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26563362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0449-2
_version_ 1782412278884204544
author Portelli, Jonathan L.
McNulty, Jonathan P.
Bezzina, Paul
Rainford, Louise
author_facet Portelli, Jonathan L.
McNulty, Jonathan P.
Bezzina, Paul
Rainford, Louise
author_sort Portelli, Jonathan L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to investigate radiology practitioners’ and radiographers’ radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging examinations. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers working at a primary paediatric referral centre in Malta. Part of the survey asked participants to indicate the typical effective dose (ED) for several commonly performed paediatric imaging examinations, answer five true-false statements about radiation protection principles, and specify their use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging. RESULTS: The return of 112 questionnaires provided a response rate of 66.7 %. Overall, imaging practitioners demonstrated poor awareness of radiation doses associated with several paediatric imaging examinations, with only 20 % providing the correct ED estimate for radiation-based examinations. Nearly all participants had undertaken radiation protection training, but the type and duration of training undertaken varied. When asked about the use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging, 77.3 % claimed that they ‘did not’ or ‘were not sure’ if they made use of them. CONCLUSIONS: Poor awareness of radiation doses associated with paediatric imaging examinations and the non-use of referral guidelines may impede imaging practitioners’ role in the justification and optimisation of paediatric imaging examinations. Education and training activities to address such shortcomings are recommended. KEY POINTS: • Imaging practitioners demonstrated poor radiation dose awareness for 5 paediatric imaging examinations. • Most radiology practitioners and radiographers were ‘not sure’ or ‘did not’ use referral guidelines. • Imaging practitioners generally considered previously undertaken paediatric imaging examinations. • Some imaging practitioners had not undertaken training in radiation protection for 10 years. • Training activities to address imaging practitioners’ poor radiation dose awareness are encouraged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4729707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47297072016-02-03 Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers Portelli, Jonathan L. McNulty, Jonathan P. Bezzina, Paul Rainford, Louise Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to investigate radiology practitioners’ and radiographers’ radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging examinations. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers working at a primary paediatric referral centre in Malta. Part of the survey asked participants to indicate the typical effective dose (ED) for several commonly performed paediatric imaging examinations, answer five true-false statements about radiation protection principles, and specify their use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging. RESULTS: The return of 112 questionnaires provided a response rate of 66.7 %. Overall, imaging practitioners demonstrated poor awareness of radiation doses associated with several paediatric imaging examinations, with only 20 % providing the correct ED estimate for radiation-based examinations. Nearly all participants had undertaken radiation protection training, but the type and duration of training undertaken varied. When asked about the use of referral guidelines for paediatric imaging, 77.3 % claimed that they ‘did not’ or ‘were not sure’ if they made use of them. CONCLUSIONS: Poor awareness of radiation doses associated with paediatric imaging examinations and the non-use of referral guidelines may impede imaging practitioners’ role in the justification and optimisation of paediatric imaging examinations. Education and training activities to address such shortcomings are recommended. KEY POINTS: • Imaging practitioners demonstrated poor radiation dose awareness for 5 paediatric imaging examinations. • Most radiology practitioners and radiographers were ‘not sure’ or ‘did not’ use referral guidelines. • Imaging practitioners generally considered previously undertaken paediatric imaging examinations. • Some imaging practitioners had not undertaken training in radiation protection for 10 years. • Training activities to address imaging practitioners’ poor radiation dose awareness are encouraged. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4729707/ /pubmed/26563362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0449-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Portelli, Jonathan L.
McNulty, Jonathan P.
Bezzina, Paul
Rainford, Louise
Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title_full Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title_fullStr Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title_full_unstemmed Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title_short Paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
title_sort paediatric imaging radiation dose awareness and use of referral guidelines amongst radiology practitioners and radiographers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26563362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0449-2
work_keys_str_mv AT portellijonathanl paediatricimagingradiationdoseawarenessanduseofreferralguidelinesamongstradiologypractitionersandradiographers
AT mcnultyjonathanp paediatricimagingradiationdoseawarenessanduseofreferralguidelinesamongstradiologypractitionersandradiographers
AT bezzinapaul paediatricimagingradiationdoseawarenessanduseofreferralguidelinesamongstradiologypractitionersandradiographers
AT rainfordlouise paediatricimagingradiationdoseawarenessanduseofreferralguidelinesamongstradiologypractitionersandradiographers