Cargando…
Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies
PURPOSE: Data from two noninferiority trials of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen were assessed for the impact of acute nausea and vomiting on delayed outcome in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC). METHODS: Chemo-naive patients were...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2871-x |
_version_ | 1782412292891082752 |
---|---|
author | Celio, Luigi Bonizzoni, Erminio De Braud, Filippo Agustoni, Francesco Aapro, Matti |
author_facet | Celio, Luigi Bonizzoni, Erminio De Braud, Filippo Agustoni, Francesco Aapro, Matti |
author_sort | Celio, Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Data from two noninferiority trials of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen were assessed for the impact of acute nausea and vomiting on delayed outcome in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC). METHODS: Chemo-naive patients were randomized to receive palonosetron (0.25 mg IV) plus dexamethasone (8 mg IV) on day 1 of chemotherapy, or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the MEC (n = 237) and AC (n = 380) cohorts. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they experienced vomiting and/or moderate-to-severe nausea during the acute phase (high- and low-risk groups, respectively). Primary efficacy endpoint was the complete protection (CP) against delayed vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea. Patient’s satisfaction (0–100 mm visual analog scale) was also analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 209 low-risk patients undergoing MEC, delayed CP occurred in 82.9 % of those who received single-dose dexamethasone and 89.8 % of those who received 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.165). Of the 271 low-risk patients undergoing AC, CP was achieved in 71.7 % of those treated with single-dose dexamethasone and 84.2 % treated with 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.019). In spite of these observations, the patient satisfaction data was not influenced by dexamethasone regimen. In both cohorts, occurrence of acute vomiting or moderate-to-severe nausea was the key independent-predictor for delayed vomiting or nausea, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dexamethasone-sparing regimen provides adequate delayed protection in patients undergoing MEC who are at low risk for delayed symptoms, and can still be discussed for low-risk AC patients as the daily difference in control is modest. Additional dexamethasone doses can be customized on the basis of occurrence or absence of acute symptoms in the first cycle of MEC and even AC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4729784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47297842016-02-04 Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies Celio, Luigi Bonizzoni, Erminio De Braud, Filippo Agustoni, Francesco Aapro, Matti Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Data from two noninferiority trials of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen were assessed for the impact of acute nausea and vomiting on delayed outcome in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC). METHODS: Chemo-naive patients were randomized to receive palonosetron (0.25 mg IV) plus dexamethasone (8 mg IV) on day 1 of chemotherapy, or the same regimen followed by oral dexamethasone on days 2 and 3 in the MEC (n = 237) and AC (n = 380) cohorts. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they experienced vomiting and/or moderate-to-severe nausea during the acute phase (high- and low-risk groups, respectively). Primary efficacy endpoint was the complete protection (CP) against delayed vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea. Patient’s satisfaction (0–100 mm visual analog scale) was also analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 209 low-risk patients undergoing MEC, delayed CP occurred in 82.9 % of those who received single-dose dexamethasone and 89.8 % of those who received 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.165). Of the 271 low-risk patients undergoing AC, CP was achieved in 71.7 % of those treated with single-dose dexamethasone and 84.2 % treated with 3-day dexamethasone (P = 0.019). In spite of these observations, the patient satisfaction data was not influenced by dexamethasone regimen. In both cohorts, occurrence of acute vomiting or moderate-to-severe nausea was the key independent-predictor for delayed vomiting or nausea, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dexamethasone-sparing regimen provides adequate delayed protection in patients undergoing MEC who are at low risk for delayed symptoms, and can still be discussed for low-risk AC patients as the daily difference in control is modest. Additional dexamethasone doses can be customized on the basis of occurrence or absence of acute symptoms in the first cycle of MEC and even AC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-06 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4729784/ /pubmed/26245497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2871-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Celio, Luigi Bonizzoni, Erminio De Braud, Filippo Agustoni, Francesco Aapro, Matti Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title | Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title_full | Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title_fullStr | Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title_short | Should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? Insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
title_sort | should clinicians always administer dexamethasone beyond 24 h after chemotherapy to control delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic regimens? insight from the re-evaluation of two randomized studies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2871-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celioluigi shouldcliniciansalwaysadministerdexamethasonebeyond24hafterchemotherapytocontroldelayednauseaandvomitingcausedbymoderatelyemetogenicregimensinsightfromthereevaluationoftworandomizedstudies AT bonizzonierminio shouldcliniciansalwaysadministerdexamethasonebeyond24hafterchemotherapytocontroldelayednauseaandvomitingcausedbymoderatelyemetogenicregimensinsightfromthereevaluationoftworandomizedstudies AT debraudfilippo shouldcliniciansalwaysadministerdexamethasonebeyond24hafterchemotherapytocontroldelayednauseaandvomitingcausedbymoderatelyemetogenicregimensinsightfromthereevaluationoftworandomizedstudies AT agustonifrancesco shouldcliniciansalwaysadministerdexamethasonebeyond24hafterchemotherapytocontroldelayednauseaandvomitingcausedbymoderatelyemetogenicregimensinsightfromthereevaluationoftworandomizedstudies AT aapromatti shouldcliniciansalwaysadministerdexamethasonebeyond24hafterchemotherapytocontroldelayednauseaandvomitingcausedbymoderatelyemetogenicregimensinsightfromthereevaluationoftworandomizedstudies |