Cargando…
A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357 |
_version_ | 1782412342479290368 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Dee Smith, James A. Meadows, Nick A. Schuh, A. Manescu, Katie E. Bure, Kim Davies, Benjamin Horne, Rob Kope, Mike DiGiusto, David L. Brindley, David A. |
author_facet | Luo, Dee Smith, James A. Meadows, Nick A. Schuh, A. Manescu, Katie E. Bure, Kim Davies, Benjamin Horne, Rob Kope, Mike DiGiusto, David L. Brindley, David A. |
author_sort | Luo, Dee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and specific mutations to elucidate disease pathways, stratify patient populations, and target drug therapies. CDx can substantially influence the development and regulatory approval for certain high-risk biologics. However, despite the increasingly important role of companion diagnostics in the realization of personalized medicine, in the USA, there are only 23 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved companion diagnostics on the market for 11 unique indications. Personalized medicines have great potential, yet their use is currently constrained. A major factor for this may lie in the increased complexity of the companion diagnostic and corresponding therapeutic development and adoption pathways. Understanding the market dynamics of companion diagnostic/therapeutic (CDx/Rx) pairs is important to further development and adoption of personalized medicine. Therefore, data collected on a variety of factors may highlight incentives or disincentives driving the development of companion diagnostics. Statistical analysis for 36 hypotheses resulted in two significant relationships and 34 non-significant relationships. The sensitivity of the companion diagnostic was the only factor that significantly correlated with the price of the companion diagnostic. This result indicates that while there is regulatory pressure for the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry to collaborate and co-develop companion diagnostics for the approval of personalized therapeutics, there seems to be a lack of parallel economic collaboration to incentivize development of companion diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4730156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47301562016-02-08 A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics Luo, Dee Smith, James A. Meadows, Nick A. Schuh, A. Manescu, Katie E. Bure, Kim Davies, Benjamin Horne, Rob Kope, Mike DiGiusto, David L. Brindley, David A. Front Genet Genetics Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and specific mutations to elucidate disease pathways, stratify patient populations, and target drug therapies. CDx can substantially influence the development and regulatory approval for certain high-risk biologics. However, despite the increasingly important role of companion diagnostics in the realization of personalized medicine, in the USA, there are only 23 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved companion diagnostics on the market for 11 unique indications. Personalized medicines have great potential, yet their use is currently constrained. A major factor for this may lie in the increased complexity of the companion diagnostic and corresponding therapeutic development and adoption pathways. Understanding the market dynamics of companion diagnostic/therapeutic (CDx/Rx) pairs is important to further development and adoption of personalized medicine. Therefore, data collected on a variety of factors may highlight incentives or disincentives driving the development of companion diagnostics. Statistical analysis for 36 hypotheses resulted in two significant relationships and 34 non-significant relationships. The sensitivity of the companion diagnostic was the only factor that significantly correlated with the price of the companion diagnostic. This result indicates that while there is regulatory pressure for the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry to collaborate and co-develop companion diagnostics for the approval of personalized therapeutics, there seems to be a lack of parallel economic collaboration to incentivize development of companion diagnostics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4730156/ /pubmed/26858745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luo, Smith, Meadows, Schuh, Manescu, Bure, Davies, Horne, Kope, DiGiusto and Brindley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Luo, Dee Smith, James A. Meadows, Nick A. Schuh, A. Manescu, Katie E. Bure, Kim Davies, Benjamin Horne, Rob Kope, Mike DiGiusto, David L. Brindley, David A. A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title | A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title_full | A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title_fullStr | A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title_full_unstemmed | A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title_short | A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics |
title_sort | quantitative assessment of factors affecting the technological development and adoption of companion diagnostics |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luodee aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT smithjamesa aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT meadowsnicka aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT schuha aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT manescukatiee aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT burekim aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT daviesbenjamin aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT hornerob aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT kopemike aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT digiustodavidl aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT brindleydavida aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT luodee quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT smithjamesa quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT meadowsnicka quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT schuha quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT manescukatiee quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT burekim quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT daviesbenjamin quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT hornerob quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT kopemike quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT digiustodavidl quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics AT brindleydavida quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics |