Cargando…

A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics

Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Dee, Smith, James A., Meadows, Nick A., Schuh, A., Manescu, Katie E., Bure, Kim, Davies, Benjamin, Horne, Rob, Kope, Mike, DiGiusto, David L., Brindley, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357
_version_ 1782412342479290368
author Luo, Dee
Smith, James A.
Meadows, Nick A.
Schuh, A.
Manescu, Katie E.
Bure, Kim
Davies, Benjamin
Horne, Rob
Kope, Mike
DiGiusto, David L.
Brindley, David A.
author_facet Luo, Dee
Smith, James A.
Meadows, Nick A.
Schuh, A.
Manescu, Katie E.
Bure, Kim
Davies, Benjamin
Horne, Rob
Kope, Mike
DiGiusto, David L.
Brindley, David A.
author_sort Luo, Dee
collection PubMed
description Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and specific mutations to elucidate disease pathways, stratify patient populations, and target drug therapies. CDx can substantially influence the development and regulatory approval for certain high-risk biologics. However, despite the increasingly important role of companion diagnostics in the realization of personalized medicine, in the USA, there are only 23 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved companion diagnostics on the market for 11 unique indications. Personalized medicines have great potential, yet their use is currently constrained. A major factor for this may lie in the increased complexity of the companion diagnostic and corresponding therapeutic development and adoption pathways. Understanding the market dynamics of companion diagnostic/therapeutic (CDx/Rx) pairs is important to further development and adoption of personalized medicine. Therefore, data collected on a variety of factors may highlight incentives or disincentives driving the development of companion diagnostics. Statistical analysis for 36 hypotheses resulted in two significant relationships and 34 non-significant relationships. The sensitivity of the companion diagnostic was the only factor that significantly correlated with the price of the companion diagnostic. This result indicates that while there is regulatory pressure for the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry to collaborate and co-develop companion diagnostics for the approval of personalized therapeutics, there seems to be a lack of parallel economic collaboration to incentivize development of companion diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4730156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47301562016-02-08 A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics Luo, Dee Smith, James A. Meadows, Nick A. Schuh, A. Manescu, Katie E. Bure, Kim Davies, Benjamin Horne, Rob Kope, Mike DiGiusto, David L. Brindley, David A. Front Genet Genetics Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and specific mutations to elucidate disease pathways, stratify patient populations, and target drug therapies. CDx can substantially influence the development and regulatory approval for certain high-risk biologics. However, despite the increasingly important role of companion diagnostics in the realization of personalized medicine, in the USA, there are only 23 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved companion diagnostics on the market for 11 unique indications. Personalized medicines have great potential, yet their use is currently constrained. A major factor for this may lie in the increased complexity of the companion diagnostic and corresponding therapeutic development and adoption pathways. Understanding the market dynamics of companion diagnostic/therapeutic (CDx/Rx) pairs is important to further development and adoption of personalized medicine. Therefore, data collected on a variety of factors may highlight incentives or disincentives driving the development of companion diagnostics. Statistical analysis for 36 hypotheses resulted in two significant relationships and 34 non-significant relationships. The sensitivity of the companion diagnostic was the only factor that significantly correlated with the price of the companion diagnostic. This result indicates that while there is regulatory pressure for the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry to collaborate and co-develop companion diagnostics for the approval of personalized therapeutics, there seems to be a lack of parallel economic collaboration to incentivize development of companion diagnostics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4730156/ /pubmed/26858745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luo, Smith, Meadows, Schuh, Manescu, Bure, Davies, Horne, Kope, DiGiusto and Brindley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Luo, Dee
Smith, James A.
Meadows, Nick A.
Schuh, A.
Manescu, Katie E.
Bure, Kim
Davies, Benjamin
Horne, Rob
Kope, Mike
DiGiusto, David L.
Brindley, David A.
A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title_full A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title_fullStr A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title_short A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics
title_sort quantitative assessment of factors affecting the technological development and adoption of companion diagnostics
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00357
work_keys_str_mv AT luodee aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT smithjamesa aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT meadowsnicka aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT schuha aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT manescukatiee aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT burekim aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT daviesbenjamin aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT hornerob aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT kopemike aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT digiustodavidl aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT brindleydavida aquantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT luodee quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT smithjamesa quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT meadowsnicka quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT schuha quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT manescukatiee quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT burekim quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT daviesbenjamin quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT hornerob quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT kopemike quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT digiustodavidl quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics
AT brindleydavida quantitativeassessmentoffactorsaffectingthetechnologicaldevelopmentandadoptionofcompaniondiagnostics