Cargando…

Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK

It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prochorskaite, Agne, Couch, Chris, Malys, Naglis, Maliene, Vida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111
_version_ 1782412414805868544
author Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
author_facet Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
author_sort Prochorskaite, Agne
collection PubMed
description It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4730502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47305022016-02-11 Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida Int J Environ Res Public Health Article It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers. MDPI 2016-01-07 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4730502/ /pubmed/26751465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title_full Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title_fullStr Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title_short Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
title_sort housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the uk
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111
work_keys_str_mv AT prochorskaiteagne housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk
AT couchchris housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk
AT malysnaglis housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk
AT malienevida housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk