Cargando…
Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK
It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111 |
_version_ | 1782412414805868544 |
---|---|
author | Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida |
author_facet | Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida |
author_sort | Prochorskaite, Agne |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4730502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47305022016-02-11 Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida Int J Environ Res Public Health Article It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers. MDPI 2016-01-07 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4730502/ /pubmed/26751465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title | Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title_full | Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title_fullStr | Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title_short | Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK |
title_sort | housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the uk |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prochorskaiteagne housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk AT couchchris housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk AT malysnaglis housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk AT malienevida housingstakeholderpreferencesforthesoftfeaturesofsustainableandhealthyhousingdesignintheuk |