Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: Safety of emergency intubation may be improved by standardising equipment preparation; the efficacy of cognitive aids is unknown. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial compared no cognitive aid (control) with the use of a checklist or picture template for emergency airway equipment p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Elliot, Fitzpatrick, Patrick, Cincotta, Domenic R., Grindlay, Joanne, Barrett, Michael Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z
_version_ 1782412438703964160
author Long, Elliot
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Cincotta, Domenic R.
Grindlay, Joanne
Barrett, Michael Joseph
author_facet Long, Elliot
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Cincotta, Domenic R.
Grindlay, Joanne
Barrett, Michael Joseph
author_sort Long, Elliot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Safety of emergency intubation may be improved by standardising equipment preparation; the efficacy of cognitive aids is unknown. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial compared no cognitive aid (control) with the use of a checklist or picture template for emergency airway equipment preparation in the Emergency Department of The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants were recruited, 21 randomised to each group. Equal numbers of nursing, junior medical, and senior medical staff were included in each group. Compared to controls, the checklist or template group had significantly lower equipment omission rates (median 30 % IQR 20–40 % control, median 10 % IQR 5–10 % checklist, median 10 % IQR 5–20 % template; p < 0.05). The combined omission rate and sizing error rate was lower using a checklist or template (median 35 % IQR 30–45 % control, median 15 % IQR 10–20 % checklist, median 15 % IQR 10–30 % template; p < 0.05). The template group had less variation in equipment location compared to checklist or controls. There was no significant difference in preparation time in controls (mean 3 min 14 s sd 56 s) compared to checklist (mean 3 min 46 s sd 1 min 15 s) or template (mean 3 min 6 s sd 49 s; p = 0.06). DISCUSSION: Template use reduces variation in airway equipment location during preparation foremergency intubation, with an equivalent reduction in equipment omission rate to the use of a checklist. The use of a template for equipment preparation and a checklist for team, patient, and monitoring preparation may provide the best combination of both cognitive aids. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a cognitive aid for emergency airway equipment preparation reduces errors of omission. Template utilisation reduces variation in equipment location. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000541505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4730650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47306502016-01-29 A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department Long, Elliot Fitzpatrick, Patrick Cincotta, Domenic R. Grindlay, Joanne Barrett, Michael Joseph Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Safety of emergency intubation may be improved by standardising equipment preparation; the efficacy of cognitive aids is unknown. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial compared no cognitive aid (control) with the use of a checklist or picture template for emergency airway equipment preparation in the Emergency Department of The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne. RESULTS: Sixty-three participants were recruited, 21 randomised to each group. Equal numbers of nursing, junior medical, and senior medical staff were included in each group. Compared to controls, the checklist or template group had significantly lower equipment omission rates (median 30 % IQR 20–40 % control, median 10 % IQR 5–10 % checklist, median 10 % IQR 5–20 % template; p < 0.05). The combined omission rate and sizing error rate was lower using a checklist or template (median 35 % IQR 30–45 % control, median 15 % IQR 10–20 % checklist, median 15 % IQR 10–30 % template; p < 0.05). The template group had less variation in equipment location compared to checklist or controls. There was no significant difference in preparation time in controls (mean 3 min 14 s sd 56 s) compared to checklist (mean 3 min 46 s sd 1 min 15 s) or template (mean 3 min 6 s sd 49 s; p = 0.06). DISCUSSION: Template use reduces variation in airway equipment location during preparation foremergency intubation, with an equivalent reduction in equipment omission rate to the use of a checklist. The use of a template for equipment preparation and a checklist for team, patient, and monitoring preparation may provide the best combination of both cognitive aids. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a cognitive aid for emergency airway equipment preparation reduces errors of omission. Template utilisation reduces variation in equipment location. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000541505). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4730650/ /pubmed/26817789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z Text en © Long et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Long, Elliot
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Cincotta, Domenic R.
Grindlay, Joanne
Barrett, Michael Joseph
A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title_full A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title_short A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department
title_sort randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a paediatric emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26817789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z
work_keys_str_mv AT longelliot arandomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT fitzpatrickpatrick arandomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT cincottadomenicr arandomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT grindlayjoanne arandomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT barrettmichaeljoseph arandomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT longelliot randomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT fitzpatrickpatrick randomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT cincottadomenicr randomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT grindlayjoanne randomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment
AT barrettmichaeljoseph randomisedcontrolledtrialofcognitiveaidsforemergencyairwayequipmentpreparationinapaediatricemergencydepartment