Cargando…
The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction
BACKGROUND: The rotator interval (RI) has been exploited as a potentially benign point of entry into the glenohumeral (GH) joint. Bounded by the supraspinatus, subscapularis and coracoid process of the scapula, the RI is believed to be important in the shoulder’s soft tissue balancing and function....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0898-x |
_version_ | 1782412457877176320 |
---|---|
author | Haghpanah, Babak Walley, Kempland C. Hingsammer, Andreas Harlow, Ethan R. Oftadeh, Ramin Vaziri, Ashkan Ramappa, Arun J. DeAngelis, Joseph P. Nazarian, Ara |
author_facet | Haghpanah, Babak Walley, Kempland C. Hingsammer, Andreas Harlow, Ethan R. Oftadeh, Ramin Vaziri, Ashkan Ramappa, Arun J. DeAngelis, Joseph P. Nazarian, Ara |
author_sort | Haghpanah, Babak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rotator interval (RI) has been exploited as a potentially benign point of entry into the glenohumeral (GH) joint. Bounded by the supraspinatus, subscapularis and coracoid process of the scapula, the RI is believed to be important in the shoulder’s soft tissue balancing and function. However, the role of the RI in shoulder kinematics is not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to describe the effect of the RI on GH motion during abduction of the arm. METHODS: Six shoulders from three cadaveric torsos were studied to assess the impact of changes in the RI during abduction under four conditions: Intact (Baseline), Opened, Repaired (repaired with side-to-side tissue approximation, no overlap) and Tightened (repaired with 1 cm overlap). For each group, the GH translation and area under the Curve (AUC) were measured during abduction using an intact cadaveric shoulder (intact torso). RESULTS: GH kinematics varied in response to each intervention and throughout the entire abduction arc. Opening the RI caused a significant change in GH translation. The Repair and Tightened groups behaved similarly along all axes of GH motion. CONCLUSIONS: The RI is central to normal GH kinematics. Any insult to the tissue’s integrity alters the shoulder’s motion throughout abduction. In this model, closing the RI side-to-side has the same effect as tightening the RI. Since suture closure may offer the same benefit as tightening the RI, clinicians should consider this effect when treating patients with shoulder laxity. This investigation provides an improved perspective on the role of the RI on GH kinematics during abduction. When managing shoulder pathology, surgeons should consider how these different methods of RI closure affect the joint’s motion. In different circumstances, the surgical approach to the RI can be tailored to address each patient’s specific needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4730735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47307352016-01-29 The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction Haghpanah, Babak Walley, Kempland C. Hingsammer, Andreas Harlow, Ethan R. Oftadeh, Ramin Vaziri, Ashkan Ramappa, Arun J. DeAngelis, Joseph P. Nazarian, Ara BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The rotator interval (RI) has been exploited as a potentially benign point of entry into the glenohumeral (GH) joint. Bounded by the supraspinatus, subscapularis and coracoid process of the scapula, the RI is believed to be important in the shoulder’s soft tissue balancing and function. However, the role of the RI in shoulder kinematics is not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to describe the effect of the RI on GH motion during abduction of the arm. METHODS: Six shoulders from three cadaveric torsos were studied to assess the impact of changes in the RI during abduction under four conditions: Intact (Baseline), Opened, Repaired (repaired with side-to-side tissue approximation, no overlap) and Tightened (repaired with 1 cm overlap). For each group, the GH translation and area under the Curve (AUC) were measured during abduction using an intact cadaveric shoulder (intact torso). RESULTS: GH kinematics varied in response to each intervention and throughout the entire abduction arc. Opening the RI caused a significant change in GH translation. The Repair and Tightened groups behaved similarly along all axes of GH motion. CONCLUSIONS: The RI is central to normal GH kinematics. Any insult to the tissue’s integrity alters the shoulder’s motion throughout abduction. In this model, closing the RI side-to-side has the same effect as tightening the RI. Since suture closure may offer the same benefit as tightening the RI, clinicians should consider this effect when treating patients with shoulder laxity. This investigation provides an improved perspective on the role of the RI on GH kinematics during abduction. When managing shoulder pathology, surgeons should consider how these different methods of RI closure affect the joint’s motion. In different circumstances, the surgical approach to the RI can be tailored to address each patient’s specific needs. BioMed Central 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4730735/ /pubmed/26818612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0898-x Text en © Haghpanah et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Haghpanah, Babak Walley, Kempland C. Hingsammer, Andreas Harlow, Ethan R. Oftadeh, Ramin Vaziri, Ashkan Ramappa, Arun J. DeAngelis, Joseph P. Nazarian, Ara The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title | The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title_full | The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title_fullStr | The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title_short | The effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
title_sort | effect of the rotator interval on glenohumeral kinematics during abduction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730735/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-0898-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haghpanahbabak theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT walleykemplandc theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT hingsammerandreas theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT harlowethanr theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT oftadehramin theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT vaziriashkan theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT ramappaarunj theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT deangelisjosephp theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT nazarianara theeffectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT haghpanahbabak effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT walleykemplandc effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT hingsammerandreas effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT harlowethanr effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT oftadehramin effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT vaziriashkan effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT ramappaarunj effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT deangelisjosephp effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction AT nazarianara effectoftherotatorintervalonglenohumeralkinematicsduringabduction |