Cargando…
Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208 |
_version_ | 1782412496721674240 |
---|---|
author | McNair, Helen A Harris, Emma J Hansen, Vibeke N Thomas, Karen South, Christopher Hafeez, Shaista Huddart, Robert Dearnaley, David P |
author_facet | McNair, Helen A Harris, Emma J Hansen, Vibeke N Thomas, Karen South, Christopher Hafeez, Shaista Huddart, Robert Dearnaley, David P |
author_sort | McNair, Helen A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length or increasing exposure, compared with standard imaging protocol. METHODS: CBCT images were acquired using a novel 7 cm length image with standard exposure (1644 mAs) at Fraction 1 (7), standard 12 cm length image (1644 mAs) at Fraction 2 (12) and a 7 cm length image with higher exposure (2632 mAs) at Fraction 3 (7H) on 31 patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Eight observers (two clinicians and six radiographers) registered the images. Guidelines and training were provided. The means of the IOEs were compared using a Kruzkal–Wallis test. Levene's test was used to test for differences in the variances of the IOEs and the independent prostate position. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the IOEs of each image protocol in any direction. Mean absolute IOE was the greatest in the anteroposterior direction. Standard deviation (SD) of the IOE was the least in the left–right direction for each of the three image protocols. The SD of the IOE was significantly less than the independent prostate motion in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction only (1.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively: p = 0.017). IOEs were within 1 SD of the independent prostate motion in 95%, 77% and 96% of the images in the RL, SI and AP direction. CONCLUSION: Reducing CBCT scan length and increasing exposure did not have a significant effect on IOEs. To reduce imaging dose, a reduction in CBCT scan length could be considered without increasing the uncertainty in prostate registration. Precision of CBCT verification of prostate radiotherapy is affected by IOE and should be quantified prior to implementation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows the importance of quantifying the magnitude of IOEs prior to CBCT implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4730970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47309702016-03-11 Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure McNair, Helen A Harris, Emma J Hansen, Vibeke N Thomas, Karen South, Christopher Hafeez, Shaista Huddart, Robert Dearnaley, David P Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length or increasing exposure, compared with standard imaging protocol. METHODS: CBCT images were acquired using a novel 7 cm length image with standard exposure (1644 mAs) at Fraction 1 (7), standard 12 cm length image (1644 mAs) at Fraction 2 (12) and a 7 cm length image with higher exposure (2632 mAs) at Fraction 3 (7H) on 31 patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Eight observers (two clinicians and six radiographers) registered the images. Guidelines and training were provided. The means of the IOEs were compared using a Kruzkal–Wallis test. Levene's test was used to test for differences in the variances of the IOEs and the independent prostate position. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the IOEs of each image protocol in any direction. Mean absolute IOE was the greatest in the anteroposterior direction. Standard deviation (SD) of the IOE was the least in the left–right direction for each of the three image protocols. The SD of the IOE was significantly less than the independent prostate motion in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction only (1.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively: p = 0.017). IOEs were within 1 SD of the independent prostate motion in 95%, 77% and 96% of the images in the RL, SI and AP direction. CONCLUSION: Reducing CBCT scan length and increasing exposure did not have a significant effect on IOEs. To reduce imaging dose, a reduction in CBCT scan length could be considered without increasing the uncertainty in prostate registration. Precision of CBCT verification of prostate radiotherapy is affected by IOE and should be quantified prior to implementation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows the importance of quantifying the magnitude of IOEs prior to CBCT implementation. The British Institute of Radiology. 2015-10 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4730970/ /pubmed/26246041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper McNair, Helen A Harris, Emma J Hansen, Vibeke N Thomas, Karen South, Christopher Hafeez, Shaista Huddart, Robert Dearnaley, David P Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title | Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title_full | Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title_fullStr | Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title_short | Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
title_sort | magnitude of observer error using cone beam ct for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnairhelena magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT harrisemmaj magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT hansenvibeken magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT thomaskaren magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT southchristopher magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT hafeezshaista magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT huddartrobert magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure AT dearnaleydavidp magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure |