Cargando…

Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure

OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNair, Helen A, Harris, Emma J, Hansen, Vibeke N, Thomas, Karen, South, Christopher, Hafeez, Shaista, Huddart, Robert, Dearnaley, David P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208
_version_ 1782412496721674240
author McNair, Helen A
Harris, Emma J
Hansen, Vibeke N
Thomas, Karen
South, Christopher
Hafeez, Shaista
Huddart, Robert
Dearnaley, David P
author_facet McNair, Helen A
Harris, Emma J
Hansen, Vibeke N
Thomas, Karen
South, Christopher
Hafeez, Shaista
Huddart, Robert
Dearnaley, David P
author_sort McNair, Helen A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length or increasing exposure, compared with standard imaging protocol. METHODS: CBCT images were acquired using a novel 7 cm length image with standard exposure (1644 mAs) at Fraction 1 (7), standard 12 cm length image (1644 mAs) at Fraction 2 (12) and a 7 cm length image with higher exposure (2632 mAs) at Fraction 3 (7H) on 31 patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Eight observers (two clinicians and six radiographers) registered the images. Guidelines and training were provided. The means of the IOEs were compared using a Kruzkal–Wallis test. Levene's test was used to test for differences in the variances of the IOEs and the independent prostate position. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the IOEs of each image protocol in any direction. Mean absolute IOE was the greatest in the anteroposterior direction. Standard deviation (SD) of the IOE was the least in the left–right direction for each of the three image protocols. The SD of the IOE was significantly less than the independent prostate motion in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction only (1.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively: p = 0.017). IOEs were within 1 SD of the independent prostate motion in 95%, 77% and 96% of the images in the RL, SI and AP direction. CONCLUSION: Reducing CBCT scan length and increasing exposure did not have a significant effect on IOEs. To reduce imaging dose, a reduction in CBCT scan length could be considered without increasing the uncertainty in prostate registration. Precision of CBCT verification of prostate radiotherapy is affected by IOE and should be quantified prior to implementation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows the importance of quantifying the magnitude of IOEs prior to CBCT implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4730970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47309702016-03-11 Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure McNair, Helen A Harris, Emma J Hansen, Vibeke N Thomas, Karen South, Christopher Hafeez, Shaista Huddart, Robert Dearnaley, David P Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Cone beam CT (CBCT) enables soft-tissue registration to planning CT for position verification in radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver error (IOE) in prostate position verification using a standard CBCT protocol, and the effect of reducing CBCT scan length or increasing exposure, compared with standard imaging protocol. METHODS: CBCT images were acquired using a novel 7 cm length image with standard exposure (1644 mAs) at Fraction 1 (7), standard 12 cm length image (1644 mAs) at Fraction 2 (12) and a 7 cm length image with higher exposure (2632 mAs) at Fraction 3 (7H) on 31 patients receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Eight observers (two clinicians and six radiographers) registered the images. Guidelines and training were provided. The means of the IOEs were compared using a Kruzkal–Wallis test. Levene's test was used to test for differences in the variances of the IOEs and the independent prostate position. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the IOEs of each image protocol in any direction. Mean absolute IOE was the greatest in the anteroposterior direction. Standard deviation (SD) of the IOE was the least in the left–right direction for each of the three image protocols. The SD of the IOE was significantly less than the independent prostate motion in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction only (1.8 and 3.0 mm, respectively: p = 0.017). IOEs were within 1 SD of the independent prostate motion in 95%, 77% and 96% of the images in the RL, SI and AP direction. CONCLUSION: Reducing CBCT scan length and increasing exposure did not have a significant effect on IOEs. To reduce imaging dose, a reduction in CBCT scan length could be considered without increasing the uncertainty in prostate registration. Precision of CBCT verification of prostate radiotherapy is affected by IOE and should be quantified prior to implementation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study shows the importance of quantifying the magnitude of IOEs prior to CBCT implementation. The British Institute of Radiology. 2015-10 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4730970/ /pubmed/26246041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
McNair, Helen A
Harris, Emma J
Hansen, Vibeke N
Thomas, Karen
South, Christopher
Hafeez, Shaista
Huddart, Robert
Dearnaley, David P
Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title_full Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title_fullStr Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title_full_unstemmed Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title_short Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
title_sort magnitude of observer error using cone beam ct for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4730970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150208
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnairhelena magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT harrisemmaj magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT hansenvibeken magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT thomaskaren magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT southchristopher magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT hafeezshaista magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT huddartrobert magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure
AT dearnaleydavidp magnitudeofobservererrorusingconebeamctforprostateinterfractionmotionestimationeffectofreducingscanlengthorincreasingexposure