Cargando…

Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus

PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN, WESTGATE, KATE, STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K., BLAIR, STEVEN N., BULL, FIONA C., CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M., DUNSTAN, DAVID W., EKELUND, ULF, ESLIGER, DALE W., FREEDSON, PATTY S., GRANAT, MALCOLM H., MATTHEWS, CHARLES E., OWEN, NEVILLE, ROWLANDS, ALEX V., SHERAR, LAUREN B., TREMBLAY, MARK S., TROIANO, RICHARD P., BRAGE, SØREN, HEALY, GENEVIEVE N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661
_version_ 1782412524486918144
author WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN
WESTGATE, KATE
STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K.
BLAIR, STEVEN N.
BULL, FIONA C.
CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M.
DUNSTAN, DAVID W.
EKELUND, ULF
ESLIGER, DALE W.
FREEDSON, PATTY S.
GRANAT, MALCOLM H.
MATTHEWS, CHARLES E.
OWEN, NEVILLE
ROWLANDS, ALEX V.
SHERAR, LAUREN B.
TREMBLAY, MARK S.
TROIANO, RICHARD P.
BRAGE, SØREN
HEALY, GENEVIEVE N.
author_facet WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN
WESTGATE, KATE
STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K.
BLAIR, STEVEN N.
BULL, FIONA C.
CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M.
DUNSTAN, DAVID W.
EKELUND, ULF
ESLIGER, DALE W.
FREEDSON, PATTY S.
GRANAT, MALCOLM H.
MATTHEWS, CHARLES E.
OWEN, NEVILLE
ROWLANDS, ALEX V.
SHERAR, LAUREN B.
TREMBLAY, MARK S.
TROIANO, RICHARD P.
BRAGE, SØREN
HEALY, GENEVIEVE N.
author_sort WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. RESULTS: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47312362016-01-28 Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN WESTGATE, KATE STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K. BLAIR, STEVEN N. BULL, FIONA C. CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M. DUNSTAN, DAVID W. EKELUND, ULF ESLIGER, DALE W. FREEDSON, PATTY S. GRANAT, MALCOLM H. MATTHEWS, CHARLES E. OWEN, NEVILLE ROWLANDS, ALEX V. SHERAR, LAUREN B. TREMBLAY, MARK S. TROIANO, RICHARD P. BRAGE, SØREN HEALY, GENEVIEVE N. Med Sci Sports Exerc Epidemiology PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. RESULTS: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-10 2015-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4731236/ /pubmed/25785929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Sports Medicine This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN
WESTGATE, KATE
STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K.
BLAIR, STEVEN N.
BULL, FIONA C.
CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M.
DUNSTAN, DAVID W.
EKELUND, ULF
ESLIGER, DALE W.
FREEDSON, PATTY S.
GRANAT, MALCOLM H.
MATTHEWS, CHARLES E.
OWEN, NEVILLE
ROWLANDS, ALEX V.
SHERAR, LAUREN B.
TREMBLAY, MARK S.
TROIANO, RICHARD P.
BRAGE, SØREN
HEALY, GENEVIEVE N.
Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title_full Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title_fullStr Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title_full_unstemmed Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title_short Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
title_sort utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661
work_keys_str_mv AT wijndaelekatrien utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT westgatekate utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT stephenssamanthak utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT blairstevenn utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT bullfionac utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT chastinsebastienfm utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT dunstandavidw utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT ekelundulf utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT esligerdalew utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT freedsonpattys utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT granatmalcolmh utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT matthewscharlese utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT owenneville utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT rowlandsalexv utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT sherarlaurenb utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT tremblaymarks utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT troianorichardp utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT bragesøren utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus
AT healygenevieven utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus