Cargando…
Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus
PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 |
_version_ | 1782412524486918144 |
---|---|
author | WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN WESTGATE, KATE STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K. BLAIR, STEVEN N. BULL, FIONA C. CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M. DUNSTAN, DAVID W. EKELUND, ULF ESLIGER, DALE W. FREEDSON, PATTY S. GRANAT, MALCOLM H. MATTHEWS, CHARLES E. OWEN, NEVILLE ROWLANDS, ALEX V. SHERAR, LAUREN B. TREMBLAY, MARK S. TROIANO, RICHARD P. BRAGE, SØREN HEALY, GENEVIEVE N. |
author_facet | WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN WESTGATE, KATE STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K. BLAIR, STEVEN N. BULL, FIONA C. CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M. DUNSTAN, DAVID W. EKELUND, ULF ESLIGER, DALE W. FREEDSON, PATTY S. GRANAT, MALCOLM H. MATTHEWS, CHARLES E. OWEN, NEVILLE ROWLANDS, ALEX V. SHERAR, LAUREN B. TREMBLAY, MARK S. TROIANO, RICHARD P. BRAGE, SØREN HEALY, GENEVIEVE N. |
author_sort | WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. RESULTS: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4731236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47312362016-01-28 Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN WESTGATE, KATE STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K. BLAIR, STEVEN N. BULL, FIONA C. CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M. DUNSTAN, DAVID W. EKELUND, ULF ESLIGER, DALE W. FREEDSON, PATTY S. GRANAT, MALCOLM H. MATTHEWS, CHARLES E. OWEN, NEVILLE ROWLANDS, ALEX V. SHERAR, LAUREN B. TREMBLAY, MARK S. TROIANO, RICHARD P. BRAGE, SØREN HEALY, GENEVIEVE N. Med Sci Sports Exerc Epidemiology PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. METHODS: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n ≥ 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. RESULTS: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-10 2015-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4731236/ /pubmed/25785929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 Text en Copyright © 2015 by the American College of Sports Medicine This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology WIJNDAELE, KATRIEN WESTGATE, KATE STEPHENS, SAMANTHA K. BLAIR, STEVEN N. BULL, FIONA C. CHASTIN, SEBASTIEN F. M. DUNSTAN, DAVID W. EKELUND, ULF ESLIGER, DALE W. FREEDSON, PATTY S. GRANAT, MALCOLM H. MATTHEWS, CHARLES E. OWEN, NEVILLE ROWLANDS, ALEX V. SHERAR, LAUREN B. TREMBLAY, MARK S. TROIANO, RICHARD P. BRAGE, SØREN HEALY, GENEVIEVE N. Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title | Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title_full | Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title_fullStr | Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title_short | Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus |
title_sort | utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wijndaelekatrien utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT westgatekate utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT stephenssamanthak utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT blairstevenn utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT bullfionac utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT chastinsebastienfm utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT dunstandavidw utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT ekelundulf utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT esligerdalew utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT freedsonpattys utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT granatmalcolmh utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT matthewscharlese utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT owenneville utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT rowlandsalexv utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT sherarlaurenb utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT tremblaymarks utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT troianorichardp utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT bragesøren utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus AT healygenevieven utilizationandharmonizationofadultaccelerometrydatareviewandexpertconsensus |