Cargando…

Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice

BACKGROUND: Deficiencies in anaphylaxis management in Emergency Departments is well recognised despite established guidelines for its treatment. OBJECTIVE: To identify deficiencies in the management of anaphylaxis in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department and determine if an education intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murad, Ari, Katelaris, Constance Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844217
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.1.29
_version_ 1782412549386403840
author Murad, Ari
Katelaris, Constance Helen
author_facet Murad, Ari
Katelaris, Constance Helen
author_sort Murad, Ari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deficiencies in anaphylaxis management in Emergency Departments is well recognised despite established guidelines for its treatment. OBJECTIVE: To identify deficiencies in the management of anaphylaxis in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department and determine if an education intervention could correct these. METHODS: Paediatric and adult admissions to the Emergency Department of a busy hospital were tracked over a 10-month period with a targeted educational program being instituted at 5 months. The electronic records were retrospectively reviewed looking for cases of anaphylaxis and milder forms of immediate type allergic reactions presenting with a combination of urticaria and nonairway threatening angioedema. Anaphylaxis presentation was graded using the Brown grading system. Use of all medication during resuscitation was documented. Observation period before discharge and referral to specialist unit for follow-up was noted. RESULTS: In the first 5 months, 38 patients fulfilled our criteria. Three had severe anaphylaxis, 13 had moderately severe anaphylaxis and 12 had urticaria and angioedema without anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis was not always recognised or graded leading to inappropriate management with adrenaline often being withheld. Promethazine, usually given in parenteral form, was frequently administered. Observation time was often inadequate. Referral to an immunologist was not universally followed through. Following the educational intervention 58 patients fulfilled our criteria over the next 5 months. The appropriate use of adrenaline increased by 21% and the use of sedating antihistamines decreased by 16%, while the number of referrals to an immunologist increased by 24%. There was an 11% reduction in the number of patients who were observed for at least 4 hours. CONCLUSION: A number of deficiencies in the management of anaphylaxis presentations have been identified. Targeted educational activities aimed at the Emergency Department hospital staff may improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47314772016-02-03 Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice Murad, Ari Katelaris, Constance Helen Asia Pac Allergy Original Article BACKGROUND: Deficiencies in anaphylaxis management in Emergency Departments is well recognised despite established guidelines for its treatment. OBJECTIVE: To identify deficiencies in the management of anaphylaxis in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department and determine if an education intervention could correct these. METHODS: Paediatric and adult admissions to the Emergency Department of a busy hospital were tracked over a 10-month period with a targeted educational program being instituted at 5 months. The electronic records were retrospectively reviewed looking for cases of anaphylaxis and milder forms of immediate type allergic reactions presenting with a combination of urticaria and nonairway threatening angioedema. Anaphylaxis presentation was graded using the Brown grading system. Use of all medication during resuscitation was documented. Observation period before discharge and referral to specialist unit for follow-up was noted. RESULTS: In the first 5 months, 38 patients fulfilled our criteria. Three had severe anaphylaxis, 13 had moderately severe anaphylaxis and 12 had urticaria and angioedema without anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis was not always recognised or graded leading to inappropriate management with adrenaline often being withheld. Promethazine, usually given in parenteral form, was frequently administered. Observation time was often inadequate. Referral to an immunologist was not universally followed through. Following the educational intervention 58 patients fulfilled our criteria over the next 5 months. The appropriate use of adrenaline increased by 21% and the use of sedating antihistamines decreased by 16%, while the number of referrals to an immunologist increased by 24%. There was an 11% reduction in the number of patients who were observed for at least 4 hours. CONCLUSION: A number of deficiencies in the management of anaphylaxis presentations have been identified. Targeted educational activities aimed at the Emergency Department hospital staff may improve outcomes. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2016-01 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4731477/ /pubmed/26844217 http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.1.29 Text en Copyright © 2016. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murad, Ari
Katelaris, Constance Helen
Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title_full Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title_fullStr Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title_full_unstemmed Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title_short Anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan Emergency Department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
title_sort anaphylaxis audit in a busy metropolitan emergency department: a review of real life management compared to best practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844217
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.1.29
work_keys_str_mv AT muradari anaphylaxisauditinabusymetropolitanemergencydepartmentareviewofreallifemanagementcomparedtobestpractice
AT katelarisconstancehelen anaphylaxisauditinabusymetropolitanemergencydepartmentareviewofreallifemanagementcomparedtobestpractice