Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical (PA) radiography in detecting internal root resorption. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty single rooted human teeth with visible pulps in PA radiography were split mesiodistally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madani, Zahrasadat, Moudi, Ehsan, Bijani, Ali, Mahmoudi, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843878
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2016.01.010
_version_ 1782412562476826624
author Madani, Zahrasadat
Moudi, Ehsan
Bijani, Ali
Mahmoudi, Elham
author_facet Madani, Zahrasadat
Moudi, Ehsan
Bijani, Ali
Mahmoudi, Elham
author_sort Madani, Zahrasadat
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical (PA) radiography in detecting internal root resorption. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty single rooted human teeth with visible pulps in PA radiography were split mesiodistally along the coronal plane. Internal resorption like lesions were created in three areas (cervical, middle and apical) in labial wall of the canals in different diameters. PA radiography and CBCT images were taken from each tooth. Two observers examined the radiographs and CBCT images to evaluate the presence of resorption cavities. The data were statistically analyzed and degree of agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa (k) values. RESULTS: The mean±SD of agreement coefficient of kappa between the two observers of the CBCT images was calculated to be 0.681±0.047. The coefficients for the direct, mesial and distal PA radiography were 0.405±0.059, 0.421±0.060 and 0.432±0.056, respectively (P=0.001). The differences in the diagnostic accuracy of resorption of different sizes were statistically significant (P<0.05); however, the PA radiography and CBCT, had no statistically significant differences in detection of internal resorption lesions in the cervical, middle and apical regions. CONCLUSION: Though, CBCT has a higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in comparison with conventional radiography, this difference was not significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47315342016-02-03 Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption Madani, Zahrasadat Moudi, Ehsan Bijani, Ali Mahmoudi, Elham Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical (PA) radiography in detecting internal root resorption. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty single rooted human teeth with visible pulps in PA radiography were split mesiodistally along the coronal plane. Internal resorption like lesions were created in three areas (cervical, middle and apical) in labial wall of the canals in different diameters. PA radiography and CBCT images were taken from each tooth. Two observers examined the radiographs and CBCT images to evaluate the presence of resorption cavities. The data were statistically analyzed and degree of agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa (k) values. RESULTS: The mean±SD of agreement coefficient of kappa between the two observers of the CBCT images was calculated to be 0.681±0.047. The coefficients for the direct, mesial and distal PA radiography were 0.405±0.059, 0.421±0.060 and 0.432±0.056, respectively (P=0.001). The differences in the diagnostic accuracy of resorption of different sizes were statistically significant (P<0.05); however, the PA radiography and CBCT, had no statistically significant differences in detection of internal resorption lesions in the cervical, middle and apical regions. CONCLUSION: Though, CBCT has a higher sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in comparison with conventional radiography, this difference was not significant. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2016 2015-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4731534/ /pubmed/26843878 http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2016.01.010 Text en © 2016, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Madani, Zahrasadat
Moudi, Ehsan
Bijani, Ali
Mahmoudi, Elham
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in internal root resorption
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843878
http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/iej.2016.01.010
work_keys_str_mv AT madanizahrasadat diagnosticaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographyandperiapicalradiographyininternalrootresorption
AT moudiehsan diagnosticaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographyandperiapicalradiographyininternalrootresorption
AT bijaniali diagnosticaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographyandperiapicalradiographyininternalrootresorption
AT mahmoudielham diagnosticaccuracyofconebeamcomputedtomographyandperiapicalradiographyininternalrootresorption