Cargando…

Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation is a therapeutic option with demonstrated efficacy for conditions presenting with perineal pain caused by different etiologies. We aimed to assess whether a sacral electrode (InterStim®, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) inserted through the caudal pathway is able...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alonso Guardo, Laura, Cano Gala, Carlos, Sánchez Poveda, David, Rueda Juan, Pablo, Sánchez Montero, Francisco José, Garzón Sánchez, José Carlos, Santos Lamas, Juan Ignacio, Sánchez Hernández, Miguel Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.23
_version_ 1782412565433810944
author Alonso Guardo, Laura
Cano Gala, Carlos
Sánchez Poveda, David
Rueda Juan, Pablo
Sánchez Montero, Francisco José
Garzón Sánchez, José Carlos
Santos Lamas, Juan Ignacio
Sánchez Hernández, Miguel Vicente
author_facet Alonso Guardo, Laura
Cano Gala, Carlos
Sánchez Poveda, David
Rueda Juan, Pablo
Sánchez Montero, Francisco José
Garzón Sánchez, José Carlos
Santos Lamas, Juan Ignacio
Sánchez Hernández, Miguel Vicente
author_sort Alonso Guardo, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation is a therapeutic option with demonstrated efficacy for conditions presenting with perineal pain caused by different etiologies. We aimed to assess whether a sacral electrode (InterStim®, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) inserted through the caudal pathway is able to offer an acceptable level of sacral stimulation and rate of catheter migration. METHODS: We present 12 patients with pelvic pain who received sacral neuromodulation via the sacral hiatus with the InterStim electrode. We evaluated patient satisfaction as well as migration and removal of the electrode, if necessary. RESULTS: Our experience included 12 patients, 10 women and two men, with a mean age of 60 years. In eight of the 12 patients, the initial therapy was effective, and the final system implantation was performed. During subsequent follow-up, patient satisfaction was good. To date, there have been no cases of electrode displacement or migration. CONCLUSIONS: The caudal insertion of the InterStim electrode, with its own fixation system, and initially designed for transsacral insertion, appears in our experience to be a satisfactory option which can minimize electrode displacements, achieving similar results in therapeutic efficacy and causing no difficulties in removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47315472016-02-02 Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants Alonso Guardo, Laura Cano Gala, Carlos Sánchez Poveda, David Rueda Juan, Pablo Sánchez Montero, Francisco José Garzón Sánchez, José Carlos Santos Lamas, Juan Ignacio Sánchez Hernández, Miguel Vicente Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation is a therapeutic option with demonstrated efficacy for conditions presenting with perineal pain caused by different etiologies. We aimed to assess whether a sacral electrode (InterStim®, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) inserted through the caudal pathway is able to offer an acceptable level of sacral stimulation and rate of catheter migration. METHODS: We present 12 patients with pelvic pain who received sacral neuromodulation via the sacral hiatus with the InterStim electrode. We evaluated patient satisfaction as well as migration and removal of the electrode, if necessary. RESULTS: Our experience included 12 patients, 10 women and two men, with a mean age of 60 years. In eight of the 12 patients, the initial therapy was effective, and the final system implantation was performed. During subsequent follow-up, patient satisfaction was good. To date, there have been no cases of electrode displacement or migration. CONCLUSIONS: The caudal insertion of the InterStim electrode, with its own fixation system, and initially designed for transsacral insertion, appears in our experience to be a satisfactory option which can minimize electrode displacements, achieving similar results in therapeutic efficacy and causing no difficulties in removal. The Korean Pain Society 2016-01 2016-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4731547/ /pubmed/26839667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.23 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alonso Guardo, Laura
Cano Gala, Carlos
Sánchez Poveda, David
Rueda Juan, Pablo
Sánchez Montero, Francisco José
Garzón Sánchez, José Carlos
Santos Lamas, Juan Ignacio
Sánchez Hernández, Miguel Vicente
Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title_full Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title_fullStr Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title_full_unstemmed Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title_short Caudal Neuromodulation with the Transforaminal Sacral Electrode (InterStim®): Experience in a Pain Center Regarding 12 Implants
title_sort caudal neuromodulation with the transforaminal sacral electrode (interstim®): experience in a pain center regarding 12 implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.1.23
work_keys_str_mv AT alonsoguardolaura caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT canogalacarlos caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT sanchezpovedadavid caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT ruedajuanpablo caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT sanchezmonterofranciscojose caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT garzonsanchezjosecarlos caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT santoslamasjuanignacio caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants
AT sanchezhernandezmiguelvicente caudalneuromodulationwiththetransforaminalsacralelectrodeinterstimexperienceinapaincenterregarding12implants