Cargando…

Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases

Previous evidence suggested a significant variation in the testing algorithms used across the United Kingdom for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and new national guidelines were issued in 2012. The main aim of this paper was to explore if such variation in testing and reportin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satta, Giovanni, Parekh, Sejal, Dabrowski, Hannah, Petkar, Hawabibee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177415580467
_version_ 1782412583898185728
author Satta, Giovanni
Parekh, Sejal
Dabrowski, Hannah
Petkar, Hawabibee
author_facet Satta, Giovanni
Parekh, Sejal
Dabrowski, Hannah
Petkar, Hawabibee
author_sort Satta, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Previous evidence suggested a significant variation in the testing algorithms used across the United Kingdom for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and new national guidelines were issued in 2012. The main aim of this paper was to explore if such variation in testing and reporting is still present, to compare the management of CDI cases, and to investigate if there is any significant variation in the antibiotic policies among different hospitals. Using London hospitals as a sample, results show that there is still a wide variation of testing methods and reporting used, making comparisons difficult. It is likely that the overall variability in practices would be greater at a national and, even more, at international level. The relationship between broad-spectrum antibiotics and C. difficile incidence and alternative approaches in antibiotic guidelines may require further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47317542016-02-10 Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases Satta, Giovanni Parekh, Sejal Dabrowski, Hannah Petkar, Hawabibee J Infect Prev Short Report Previous evidence suggested a significant variation in the testing algorithms used across the United Kingdom for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and new national guidelines were issued in 2012. The main aim of this paper was to explore if such variation in testing and reporting is still present, to compare the management of CDI cases, and to investigate if there is any significant variation in the antibiotic policies among different hospitals. Using London hospitals as a sample, results show that there is still a wide variation of testing methods and reporting used, making comparisons difficult. It is likely that the overall variability in practices would be greater at a national and, even more, at international level. The relationship between broad-spectrum antibiotics and C. difficile incidence and alternative approaches in antibiotic guidelines may require further studies. SAGE Publications 2015-04-14 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4731754/ /pubmed/26877769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177415580467 Text en © The Author(s) 2015
spellingShingle Short Report
Satta, Giovanni
Parekh, Sejal
Dabrowski, Hannah
Petkar, Hawabibee
Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title_full Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title_fullStr Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title_full_unstemmed Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title_short Persisting variation in testing and reporting Clostridium difficile cases
title_sort persisting variation in testing and reporting clostridium difficile cases
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757177415580467
work_keys_str_mv AT sattagiovanni persistingvariationintestingandreportingclostridiumdifficilecases
AT parekhsejal persistingvariationintestingandreportingclostridiumdifficilecases
AT dabrowskihannah persistingvariationintestingandreportingclostridiumdifficilecases
AT petkarhawabibee persistingvariationintestingandreportingclostridiumdifficilecases