Cargando…

The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers

BACKGROUND: Several prospective studies have suggested that gait and plantar pressure abnormalities secondary to diabetic peripheral neuropathy contributes to foot ulceration. There are many different methods by which gait and plantar pressures are assessed and currently there is no agreed standardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernando, Malindu, Crowther, Robert G, Cunningham, Margaret, Lazzarini, Peter A, Sangla, Kunwarjit S, Buttner, Petra, Golledge, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0135-8
_version_ 1782412614340444160
author Fernando, Malindu
Crowther, Robert G
Cunningham, Margaret
Lazzarini, Peter A
Sangla, Kunwarjit S
Buttner, Petra
Golledge, Jonathan
author_facet Fernando, Malindu
Crowther, Robert G
Cunningham, Margaret
Lazzarini, Peter A
Sangla, Kunwarjit S
Buttner, Petra
Golledge, Jonathan
author_sort Fernando, Malindu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several prospective studies have suggested that gait and plantar pressure abnormalities secondary to diabetic peripheral neuropathy contributes to foot ulceration. There are many different methods by which gait and plantar pressures are assessed and currently there is no agreed standardised approach. This study aimed to describe the methods and reproducibility of three-dimensional gait and plantar pressure assessments in a small subset of participants using pre-existing protocols. METHODS: Fourteen participants were conveniently sampled prior to a planned longitudinal study; four patients with diabetes and plantar foot ulcers, five patients with diabetes but no foot ulcers and five healthy controls. The repeatability of measuring key biomechanical data was assessed including the identification of 16 key anatomical landmarks, the measurement of seven leg dimensions, the processing of 22 three-dimensional gait parameters and the analysis of four different plantar pressures measures at 20 foot regions. RESULTS: The mean inter-observer differences were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<7 mm) for 100 % (16 of 16) of key anatomical landmarks measured for gait analysis. The intra-observer assessment concordance correlation coefficients were > 0.9 for 100 % (7 of 7) of leg dimensions. The coefficients of variations (CVs) were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<10 %) for 100 % (22 of 22) of gait parameters. The CVs were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<30 %) for 95 % (19 of 20) of the contact area measures, 85 % (17 of 20) of mean plantar pressures, 70 % (14 of 20) of pressure time integrals and 55 % (11 of 20) of maximum sensor plantar pressure measures. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings of this study suggest that important gait and plantar pressure measurements can be reliably acquired. Nearly all measures contributing to three-dimensional gait parameter assessments were within predefined acceptable limits. Most plantar pressure measurements were also within predefined acceptable limits; however, reproducibility was not as good for assessment of the maximum sensor pressure. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the reproducibility of several biomechanical methods in a heterogeneous cohort. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0135-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47319142016-01-30 The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers Fernando, Malindu Crowther, Robert G Cunningham, Margaret Lazzarini, Peter A Sangla, Kunwarjit S Buttner, Petra Golledge, Jonathan J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Several prospective studies have suggested that gait and plantar pressure abnormalities secondary to diabetic peripheral neuropathy contributes to foot ulceration. There are many different methods by which gait and plantar pressures are assessed and currently there is no agreed standardised approach. This study aimed to describe the methods and reproducibility of three-dimensional gait and plantar pressure assessments in a small subset of participants using pre-existing protocols. METHODS: Fourteen participants were conveniently sampled prior to a planned longitudinal study; four patients with diabetes and plantar foot ulcers, five patients with diabetes but no foot ulcers and five healthy controls. The repeatability of measuring key biomechanical data was assessed including the identification of 16 key anatomical landmarks, the measurement of seven leg dimensions, the processing of 22 three-dimensional gait parameters and the analysis of four different plantar pressures measures at 20 foot regions. RESULTS: The mean inter-observer differences were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<7 mm) for 100 % (16 of 16) of key anatomical landmarks measured for gait analysis. The intra-observer assessment concordance correlation coefficients were > 0.9 for 100 % (7 of 7) of leg dimensions. The coefficients of variations (CVs) were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<10 %) for 100 % (22 of 22) of gait parameters. The CVs were within the pre-defined acceptable level (<30 %) for 95 % (19 of 20) of the contact area measures, 85 % (17 of 20) of mean plantar pressures, 70 % (14 of 20) of pressure time integrals and 55 % (11 of 20) of maximum sensor plantar pressure measures. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings of this study suggest that important gait and plantar pressure measurements can be reliably acquired. Nearly all measures contributing to three-dimensional gait parameter assessments were within predefined acceptable limits. Most plantar pressure measurements were also within predefined acceptable limits; however, reproducibility was not as good for assessment of the maximum sensor pressure. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the reproducibility of several biomechanical methods in a heterogeneous cohort. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0135-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4731914/ /pubmed/26834842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0135-8 Text en © Fernando et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fernando, Malindu
Crowther, Robert G
Cunningham, Margaret
Lazzarini, Peter A
Sangla, Kunwarjit S
Buttner, Petra
Golledge, Jonathan
The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title_full The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title_fullStr The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title_full_unstemmed The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title_short The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
title_sort reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0135-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandomalindu thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT crowtherrobertg thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT cunninghammargaret thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT lazzarinipetera thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT sanglakunwarjits thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT buttnerpetra thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT golledgejonathan thereproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT fernandomalindu reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT crowtherrobertg reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT cunninghammargaret reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT lazzarinipetera reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT sanglakunwarjits reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT buttnerpetra reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers
AT golledgejonathan reproducibilityofacquiringthreedimensionalgaitandplantarpressuredatausingestablishedprotocolsinparticipantswithandwithouttype2diabetesandfootulcers