Cargando…

Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments

BACKGROUND: Cell membranes exhibit abundant types of responses to external stimulations. Intuitively, membrane topography should be sensitive to changes of physical or chemical factors in the microenvironment. We employed the non-interferometric wide-field optical profilometry (NIWOP) technique to q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chia-Wei, Jang, Lan-Ling, Pan, Huei-Jyuan, Chen, Yun-Ru, Chen, Chih-Cheng, Lee, Chau-Hwang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26821536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0161-5
_version_ 1782412619994365952
author Lee, Chia-Wei
Jang, Lan-Ling
Pan, Huei-Jyuan
Chen, Yun-Ru
Chen, Chih-Cheng
Lee, Chau-Hwang
author_facet Lee, Chia-Wei
Jang, Lan-Ling
Pan, Huei-Jyuan
Chen, Yun-Ru
Chen, Chih-Cheng
Lee, Chau-Hwang
author_sort Lee, Chia-Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell membranes exhibit abundant types of responses to external stimulations. Intuitively, membrane topography should be sensitive to changes of physical or chemical factors in the microenvironment. We employed the non-interferometric wide-field optical profilometry (NIWOP) technique to quantify the membrane roughness of living neuroblastoma cells under various treatments that could change the mechanical properties of the cells. RESULTS: The membrane roughness was reduced as the neuroblastoma cell was treated with paclitaxel, which increases cellular stiffness by translocating microtubules toward the cell membranes. The treatment of positively charged gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) showed a similar effect. In contrast, the negatively charged AuNPs did not cause significant changes of the membrane roughness. We also checked the membrane roughness of fixed cells by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confirmed that the membrane roughness could be regarded as a parameter reflecting cellular mechanical properties. Finally, we monitored the temporal variations of the membrane roughness under the treatment with a hypertonic solution (75 mM sucrose in the culture medium). The membrane roughness was increased within 1 h but returned to the original level after 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: The results in the present study suggest that the optical measurement on membrane roughness can be regarded as a label-free method to monitor the changes in cell mechanical properties or binding properties of nanoparticles on cell surface. Because the cells were left untouched during the measurement, further tests about cell viability or drug efficacy can be done on the same specimen. Membrane roughness could thus provide a quick screening for new chemical or physical treatments on neuronal cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4731942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47319422016-01-30 Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments Lee, Chia-Wei Jang, Lan-Ling Pan, Huei-Jyuan Chen, Yun-Ru Chen, Chih-Cheng Lee, Chau-Hwang J Nanobiotechnology Methodology BACKGROUND: Cell membranes exhibit abundant types of responses to external stimulations. Intuitively, membrane topography should be sensitive to changes of physical or chemical factors in the microenvironment. We employed the non-interferometric wide-field optical profilometry (NIWOP) technique to quantify the membrane roughness of living neuroblastoma cells under various treatments that could change the mechanical properties of the cells. RESULTS: The membrane roughness was reduced as the neuroblastoma cell was treated with paclitaxel, which increases cellular stiffness by translocating microtubules toward the cell membranes. The treatment of positively charged gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) showed a similar effect. In contrast, the negatively charged AuNPs did not cause significant changes of the membrane roughness. We also checked the membrane roughness of fixed cells by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confirmed that the membrane roughness could be regarded as a parameter reflecting cellular mechanical properties. Finally, we monitored the temporal variations of the membrane roughness under the treatment with a hypertonic solution (75 mM sucrose in the culture medium). The membrane roughness was increased within 1 h but returned to the original level after 2 h. CONCLUSIONS: The results in the present study suggest that the optical measurement on membrane roughness can be regarded as a label-free method to monitor the changes in cell mechanical properties or binding properties of nanoparticles on cell surface. Because the cells were left untouched during the measurement, further tests about cell viability or drug efficacy can be done on the same specimen. Membrane roughness could thus provide a quick screening for new chemical or physical treatments on neuronal cells. BioMed Central 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4731942/ /pubmed/26821536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0161-5 Text en © Lee et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Lee, Chia-Wei
Jang, Lan-Ling
Pan, Huei-Jyuan
Chen, Yun-Ru
Chen, Chih-Cheng
Lee, Chau-Hwang
Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title_full Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title_fullStr Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title_full_unstemmed Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title_short Membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
title_sort membrane roughness as a sensitive parameter reflecting the status of neuronal cells in response to chemical and nanoparticle treatments
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4731942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26821536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0161-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leechiawei membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments
AT janglanling membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments
AT panhueijyuan membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments
AT chenyunru membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments
AT chenchihcheng membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments
AT leechauhwang membraneroughnessasasensitiveparameterreflectingthestatusofneuronalcellsinresponsetochemicalandnanoparticletreatments