Cargando…
Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review
Technical evaluation of swimming performance is an essential factor of elite athletic preparation. Novel methods of analysis, incorporating body worn inertial sensors (i.e., Microelectromechanical systems, or MEMS, accelerometers and gyroscopes), have received much attention recently from both resea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010018 |
_version_ | 1782412642280800256 |
---|---|
author | Mooney, Robert Corley, Gavin Godfrey, Alan Quinlan, Leo R ÓLaighin, Gearóid |
author_facet | Mooney, Robert Corley, Gavin Godfrey, Alan Quinlan, Leo R ÓLaighin, Gearóid |
author_sort | Mooney, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Technical evaluation of swimming performance is an essential factor of elite athletic preparation. Novel methods of analysis, incorporating body worn inertial sensors (i.e., Microelectromechanical systems, or MEMS, accelerometers and gyroscopes), have received much attention recently from both research and commercial communities as an alternative to video-based approaches. This technology may allow for improved analysis of stroke mechanics, race performance and energy expenditure, as well as real-time feedback to the coach, potentially enabling more efficient, competitive and quantitative coaching. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature related to the use of inertial sensors for the technical analysis of swimming performance. This paper focuses on providing an evaluation of the accuracy of different feature detection algorithms described in the literature for the analysis of different phases of swimming, specifically starts, turns and free-swimming. The consequences associated with different sensor attachment locations are also considered for both single and multiple sensor configurations. Additional information such as this should help practitioners to select the most appropriate systems and methods for extracting the key performance related parameters that are important to them for analysing their swimmers’ performance and may serve to inform both applied and research practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4732051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47320512016-02-12 Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review Mooney, Robert Corley, Gavin Godfrey, Alan Quinlan, Leo R ÓLaighin, Gearóid Sensors (Basel) Review Technical evaluation of swimming performance is an essential factor of elite athletic preparation. Novel methods of analysis, incorporating body worn inertial sensors (i.e., Microelectromechanical systems, or MEMS, accelerometers and gyroscopes), have received much attention recently from both research and commercial communities as an alternative to video-based approaches. This technology may allow for improved analysis of stroke mechanics, race performance and energy expenditure, as well as real-time feedback to the coach, potentially enabling more efficient, competitive and quantitative coaching. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the literature related to the use of inertial sensors for the technical analysis of swimming performance. This paper focuses on providing an evaluation of the accuracy of different feature detection algorithms described in the literature for the analysis of different phases of swimming, specifically starts, turns and free-swimming. The consequences associated with different sensor attachment locations are also considered for both single and multiple sensor configurations. Additional information such as this should help practitioners to select the most appropriate systems and methods for extracting the key performance related parameters that are important to them for analysing their swimmers’ performance and may serve to inform both applied and research practices. MDPI 2015-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4732051/ /pubmed/26712760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010018 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Mooney, Robert Corley, Gavin Godfrey, Alan Quinlan, Leo R ÓLaighin, Gearóid Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title | Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Inertial Sensor Technology for Elite Swimming Performance Analysis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | inertial sensor technology for elite swimming performance analysis: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712760 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooneyrobert inertialsensortechnologyforeliteswimmingperformanceanalysisasystematicreview AT corleygavin inertialsensortechnologyforeliteswimmingperformanceanalysisasystematicreview AT godfreyalan inertialsensortechnologyforeliteswimmingperformanceanalysisasystematicreview AT quinlanleor inertialsensortechnologyforeliteswimmingperformanceanalysisasystematicreview AT olaighingearoid inertialsensortechnologyforeliteswimmingperformanceanalysisasystematicreview |