Cargando…

Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points

Measuring sedentary behaviour and physical activity with wearable sensors provides detailed information on activity patterns and can serve health interventions. At the basis of activity analysis stands the ability to distinguish sedentary from active time. As there is no consensus regarding the opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boerema, Simone T., Essink, Gerard B., Tönis, Thijs M., van Velsen, Lex, Hermens, Hermie J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010022
_version_ 1782412643181527040
author Boerema, Simone T.
Essink, Gerard B.
Tönis, Thijs M.
van Velsen, Lex
Hermens, Hermie J.
author_facet Boerema, Simone T.
Essink, Gerard B.
Tönis, Thijs M.
van Velsen, Lex
Hermens, Hermie J.
author_sort Boerema, Simone T.
collection PubMed
description Measuring sedentary behaviour and physical activity with wearable sensors provides detailed information on activity patterns and can serve health interventions. At the basis of activity analysis stands the ability to distinguish sedentary from active time. As there is no consensus regarding the optimal cut-point for classifying sedentary behaviour, we studied the consequences of using different cut-points for this type of analysis. We conducted a battery of sitting and walking activities with 14 office workers, wearing the Promove 3D activity sensor to determine the optimal cut-point (in counts per minute (m·s(−2))) for classifying sedentary behaviour. Then, 27 office workers wore the sensor for five days. We evaluated the sensitivity of five sedentary pattern measures for various sedentary cut-points and found an optimal cut-point for sedentary behaviour of 1660 × 10(−3) m·s(−2). Total sedentary time was not sensitive to cut-point changes within ±10% of this optimal cut-point; other sedentary pattern measures were not sensitive to changes within the ±20% interval. The results from studies analyzing sedentary patterns, using different cut-points, can be compared within these boundaries. Furthermore, commercial, hip-worn activity trackers can implement feedback and interventions on sedentary behaviour patterns, using these cut-points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4732055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47320552016-02-12 Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points Boerema, Simone T. Essink, Gerard B. Tönis, Thijs M. van Velsen, Lex Hermens, Hermie J. Sensors (Basel) Article Measuring sedentary behaviour and physical activity with wearable sensors provides detailed information on activity patterns and can serve health interventions. At the basis of activity analysis stands the ability to distinguish sedentary from active time. As there is no consensus regarding the optimal cut-point for classifying sedentary behaviour, we studied the consequences of using different cut-points for this type of analysis. We conducted a battery of sitting and walking activities with 14 office workers, wearing the Promove 3D activity sensor to determine the optimal cut-point (in counts per minute (m·s(−2))) for classifying sedentary behaviour. Then, 27 office workers wore the sensor for five days. We evaluated the sensitivity of five sedentary pattern measures for various sedentary cut-points and found an optimal cut-point for sedentary behaviour of 1660 × 10(−3) m·s(−2). Total sedentary time was not sensitive to cut-point changes within ±10% of this optimal cut-point; other sedentary pattern measures were not sensitive to changes within the ±20% interval. The results from studies analyzing sedentary patterns, using different cut-points, can be compared within these boundaries. Furthermore, commercial, hip-worn activity trackers can implement feedback and interventions on sedentary behaviour patterns, using these cut-points. MDPI 2015-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4732055/ /pubmed/26712758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010022 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Boerema, Simone T.
Essink, Gerard B.
Tönis, Thijs M.
van Velsen, Lex
Hermens, Hermie J.
Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title_full Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title_fullStr Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title_full_unstemmed Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title_short Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points
title_sort sedentary behaviour profiling of office workers: a sensitivity analysis of sedentary cut-points
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010022
work_keys_str_mv AT boeremasimonet sedentarybehaviourprofilingofofficeworkersasensitivityanalysisofsedentarycutpoints
AT essinkgerardb sedentarybehaviourprofilingofofficeworkersasensitivityanalysisofsedentarycutpoints
AT tonisthijsm sedentarybehaviourprofilingofofficeworkersasensitivityanalysisofsedentarycutpoints
AT vanvelsenlex sedentarybehaviourprofilingofofficeworkersasensitivityanalysisofsedentarycutpoints
AT hermenshermiej sedentarybehaviourprofilingofofficeworkersasensitivityanalysisofsedentarycutpoints