Cargando…
Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review
In the last years, gait phase partitioning has come to be a challenging research topic due to its impact on several applications related to gait technologies. A variety of sensors can be used to feed algorithms for gait phase partitioning, mainly classifiable as wearable or non-wearable. Among weara...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010066 |
_version_ | 1782412653101056000 |
---|---|
author | Taborri, Juri Palermo, Eduardo Rossi, Stefano Cappa, Paolo |
author_facet | Taborri, Juri Palermo, Eduardo Rossi, Stefano Cappa, Paolo |
author_sort | Taborri, Juri |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the last years, gait phase partitioning has come to be a challenging research topic due to its impact on several applications related to gait technologies. A variety of sensors can be used to feed algorithms for gait phase partitioning, mainly classifiable as wearable or non-wearable. Among wearable sensors, footswitches or foot pressure insoles are generally considered as the gold standard; however, to overcome some inherent limitations of the former, inertial measurement units have become popular in recent decades. Valuable results have been achieved also though electromyography, electroneurography, and ultrasonic sensors. Non-wearable sensors, such as opto-electronic systems along with force platforms, remain the most accurate system to perform gait analysis in an indoor environment. In the present paper we identify, select, and categorize the available methodologies for gait phase detection, analyzing advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Finally, we comparatively examine the obtainable gait phase granularities, the usable computational methodologies and the optimal sensor placements on the targeted body segments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4732099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47320992016-02-12 Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review Taborri, Juri Palermo, Eduardo Rossi, Stefano Cappa, Paolo Sensors (Basel) Review In the last years, gait phase partitioning has come to be a challenging research topic due to its impact on several applications related to gait technologies. A variety of sensors can be used to feed algorithms for gait phase partitioning, mainly classifiable as wearable or non-wearable. Among wearable sensors, footswitches or foot pressure insoles are generally considered as the gold standard; however, to overcome some inherent limitations of the former, inertial measurement units have become popular in recent decades. Valuable results have been achieved also though electromyography, electroneurography, and ultrasonic sensors. Non-wearable sensors, such as opto-electronic systems along with force platforms, remain the most accurate system to perform gait analysis in an indoor environment. In the present paper we identify, select, and categorize the available methodologies for gait phase detection, analyzing advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Finally, we comparatively examine the obtainable gait phase granularities, the usable computational methodologies and the optimal sensor placements on the targeted body segments. MDPI 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4732099/ /pubmed/26751449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010066 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Taborri, Juri Palermo, Eduardo Rossi, Stefano Cappa, Paolo Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title | Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | gait partitioning methods: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26751449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taborrijuri gaitpartitioningmethodsasystematicreview AT palermoeduardo gaitpartitioningmethodsasystematicreview AT rossistefano gaitpartitioningmethodsasystematicreview AT cappapaolo gaitpartitioningmethodsasystematicreview |