Cargando…

An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage

Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shan, Guilin, Sun, Yurui, Li, Menghua, Jungbluth, Kerstin H., Maack, Christian, Buescher, Wolfgang, Schütt, Kai-Benjamin, Boeker, Peter, Schulze Lammers, Peter, Zhou, Haiyang, Cheng, Qiang, Ma, Daokun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26784194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091
_version_ 1782412658807406592
author Shan, Guilin
Sun, Yurui
Li, Menghua
Jungbluth, Kerstin H.
Maack, Christian
Buescher, Wolfgang
Schütt, Kai-Benjamin
Boeker, Peter
Schulze Lammers, Peter
Zhou, Haiyang
Cheng, Qiang
Ma, Daokun
author_facet Shan, Guilin
Sun, Yurui
Li, Menghua
Jungbluth, Kerstin H.
Maack, Christian
Buescher, Wolfgang
Schütt, Kai-Benjamin
Boeker, Peter
Schulze Lammers, Peter
Zhou, Haiyang
Cheng, Qiang
Ma, Daokun
author_sort Shan, Guilin
collection PubMed
description Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) generated by the introduction of O(2) in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O(2) sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O(2) versus CO(2) (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O(2) measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO(2). For the O(2) in situ measurement in silage, all O(2) sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O(2) depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O(2) penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O(2) concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4732124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47321242016-02-12 An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage Shan, Guilin Sun, Yurui Li, Menghua Jungbluth, Kerstin H. Maack, Christian Buescher, Wolfgang Schütt, Kai-Benjamin Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Peter Zhou, Haiyang Cheng, Qiang Ma, Daokun Sensors (Basel) Article Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) generated by the introduction of O(2) in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O(2) sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O(2) versus CO(2) (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O(2) measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO(2). For the O(2) in situ measurement in silage, all O(2) sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O(2) depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O(2) penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O(2) concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations. MDPI 2016-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4732124/ /pubmed/26784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shan, Guilin
Sun, Yurui
Li, Menghua
Jungbluth, Kerstin H.
Maack, Christian
Buescher, Wolfgang
Schütt, Kai-Benjamin
Boeker, Peter
Schulze Lammers, Peter
Zhou, Haiyang
Cheng, Qiang
Ma, Daokun
An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_full An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_fullStr An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_short An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
title_sort assessment of three different in situ oxygen sensors for monitoring silage production and storage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26784194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091
work_keys_str_mv AT shanguilin anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT sunyurui anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT limenghua anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT jungbluthkerstinh anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT maackchristian anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT buescherwolfgang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT schuttkaibenjamin anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT boekerpeter anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT schulzelammerspeter anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT zhouhaiyang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT chengqiang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT madaokun anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT shanguilin assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT sunyurui assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT limenghua assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT jungbluthkerstinh assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT maackchristian assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT buescherwolfgang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT schuttkaibenjamin assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT boekerpeter assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT schulzelammerspeter assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT zhouhaiyang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT chengqiang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage
AT madaokun assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage