Cargando…
An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage
Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091 |
_version_ | 1782412658807406592 |
---|---|
author | Shan, Guilin Sun, Yurui Li, Menghua Jungbluth, Kerstin H. Maack, Christian Buescher, Wolfgang Schütt, Kai-Benjamin Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Peter Zhou, Haiyang Cheng, Qiang Ma, Daokun |
author_facet | Shan, Guilin Sun, Yurui Li, Menghua Jungbluth, Kerstin H. Maack, Christian Buescher, Wolfgang Schütt, Kai-Benjamin Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Peter Zhou, Haiyang Cheng, Qiang Ma, Daokun |
author_sort | Shan, Guilin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) generated by the introduction of O(2) in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O(2) sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O(2) versus CO(2) (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O(2) measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO(2). For the O(2) in situ measurement in silage, all O(2) sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O(2) depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O(2) penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O(2) concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4732124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47321242016-02-12 An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage Shan, Guilin Sun, Yurui Li, Menghua Jungbluth, Kerstin H. Maack, Christian Buescher, Wolfgang Schütt, Kai-Benjamin Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Peter Zhou, Haiyang Cheng, Qiang Ma, Daokun Sensors (Basel) Article Oxygen (O(2)) concentration inside the substrate is an important measurement for silage-research and-practical management. In the laboratory gas chromatography is commonly employed for O(2) measurement. Among sensor-based techniques, accurate and reliable in situ measurement is rare because of high levels of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) generated by the introduction of O(2) in the silage. The presented study focused on assessing three types of commercial O(2) sensors, including Clark oxygen electrodes (COE), galvanic oxygen cell (GOC) sensors and the Dräger chip measurement system (DCMS). Laboratory cross calibration of O(2) versus CO(2) (each 0–15 vol.%) was made for the COE and the GOC sensors. All calibration results verified that O(2) measurements for both sensors were insensitive to CO(2). For the O(2) in situ measurement in silage, all O(2) sensors were first tested in two sealed barrels (diameter 35.7 cm; height: 60 cm) to monitor the O(2) depletion with respect to the ensiling process (Test-A). The second test (Test-B) simulated the silage unloading process by recording the O(2) penetration dynamics in three additional barrels, two covered by dry ice (0.6 kg or 1.2 kg of each) on the top surface and one without. Based on a general comparison of the experimental data, we conclude that each of these in situ sensor monitoring techniques for O(2) concentration in silage exhibit individual advantages and limitations. MDPI 2016-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4732124/ /pubmed/26784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shan, Guilin Sun, Yurui Li, Menghua Jungbluth, Kerstin H. Maack, Christian Buescher, Wolfgang Schütt, Kai-Benjamin Boeker, Peter Schulze Lammers, Peter Zhou, Haiyang Cheng, Qiang Ma, Daokun An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title | An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title_full | An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title_fullStr | An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title_full_unstemmed | An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title_short | An Assessment of Three Different In Situ Oxygen Sensors for Monitoring Silage Production and Storage |
title_sort | assessment of three different in situ oxygen sensors for monitoring silage production and storage |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26784194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s16010091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shanguilin anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT sunyurui anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT limenghua anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT jungbluthkerstinh anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT maackchristian anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT buescherwolfgang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT schuttkaibenjamin anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT boekerpeter anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT schulzelammerspeter anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT zhouhaiyang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT chengqiang anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT madaokun anassessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT shanguilin assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT sunyurui assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT limenghua assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT jungbluthkerstinh assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT maackchristian assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT buescherwolfgang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT schuttkaibenjamin assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT boekerpeter assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT schulzelammerspeter assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT zhouhaiyang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT chengqiang assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage AT madaokun assessmentofthreedifferentinsituoxygensensorsformonitoringsilageproductionandstorage |