Cargando…

Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography

We prospectively evaluated the degree of absolute agreement between measurements of lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on plain radiography (XR) and computed tomography (CT) in a consecutive cohort of 205 patients (410 hips) undergoing hip arthroscopy. Preoperative measurements of the LCEA were perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chadayammuri, Vivek, Garabekyan, Tigran, Jesse, Mary-Kristen, Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia, Strickland, Colin, Milligan, Kenneth, Mei-Dan, Omer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27011864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv063
_version_ 1782412694562799616
author Chadayammuri, Vivek
Garabekyan, Tigran
Jesse, Mary-Kristen
Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia
Strickland, Colin
Milligan, Kenneth
Mei-Dan, Omer
author_facet Chadayammuri, Vivek
Garabekyan, Tigran
Jesse, Mary-Kristen
Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia
Strickland, Colin
Milligan, Kenneth
Mei-Dan, Omer
author_sort Chadayammuri, Vivek
collection PubMed
description We prospectively evaluated the degree of absolute agreement between measurements of lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on plain radiography (XR) and computed tomography (CT) in a consecutive cohort of 205 patients (410 hips) undergoing hip arthroscopy. Preoperative measurements of the LCEA were performed bilaterally utilizing standardized anteroposterior radiographs and coronal reformatted CT scans. Demographic variables including age, gender, height, weight, BMI and clinical diagnosis were recorded for all patients. Overall, measured values of the LCEA were 2.1° larger on CT compared with XR (32.9° versus 30.8°, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest mean difference in hips with acetabular dysplasia and concomitant cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) [mean difference (CT–XR) 5.5°, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7°–7.3°, P = 0.011], followed by hips with isolated acetabular dysplasia (mean difference [CT–XR] 4.9°, 95% CI 2.7°–7.0°, P < 0.001). In contrast, 119 (29.0%) of the hips demonstrated larger measurements of the LCEA on 25 XR relative to CT. Of these hips, 20 (16.8%) had pincer-FAI and 25 had cam-FAI (21.0%), representing a significantly higher proportion compared with all other clinical subgroups (P = 0.045 and 0.036, respectively). Our study demonstrates measured values of the LCEA are consistently inflated on CT relative to XR for a wide variety of hip pathologies, highlighting the need for standardization and validation of CT-based measurements to improve the quality of clinical decision making. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4732381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47323812016-03-23 Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography Chadayammuri, Vivek Garabekyan, Tigran Jesse, Mary-Kristen Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia Strickland, Colin Milligan, Kenneth Mei-Dan, Omer J Hip Preserv Surg Research Articles We prospectively evaluated the degree of absolute agreement between measurements of lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on plain radiography (XR) and computed tomography (CT) in a consecutive cohort of 205 patients (410 hips) undergoing hip arthroscopy. Preoperative measurements of the LCEA were performed bilaterally utilizing standardized anteroposterior radiographs and coronal reformatted CT scans. Demographic variables including age, gender, height, weight, BMI and clinical diagnosis were recorded for all patients. Overall, measured values of the LCEA were 2.1° larger on CT compared with XR (32.9° versus 30.8°, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed the highest mean difference in hips with acetabular dysplasia and concomitant cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) [mean difference (CT–XR) 5.5°, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7°–7.3°, P = 0.011], followed by hips with isolated acetabular dysplasia (mean difference [CT–XR] 4.9°, 95% CI 2.7°–7.0°, P < 0.001). In contrast, 119 (29.0%) of the hips demonstrated larger measurements of the LCEA on 25 XR relative to CT. Of these hips, 20 (16.8%) had pincer-FAI and 25 had cam-FAI (21.0%), representing a significantly higher proportion compared with all other clinical subgroups (P = 0.045 and 0.036, respectively). Our study demonstrates measured values of the LCEA are consistently inflated on CT relative to XR for a wide variety of hip pathologies, highlighting the need for standardization and validation of CT-based measurements to improve the quality of clinical decision making. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II. Oxford University Press 2015-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4732381/ /pubmed/27011864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv063 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Chadayammuri, Vivek
Garabekyan, Tigran
Jesse, Mary-Kristen
Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia
Strickland, Colin
Milligan, Kenneth
Mei-Dan, Omer
Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_full Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_fullStr Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_short Measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between CT and plain radiography
title_sort measurement of lateral acetabular coverage: a comparison between ct and plain radiography
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27011864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnv063
work_keys_str_mv AT chadayammurivivek measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT garabekyantigran measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT jessemarykristen measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT pascualgarridocecilia measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT stricklandcolin measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT milligankenneth measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography
AT meidanomer measurementoflateralacetabularcoverageacomparisonbetweenctandplainradiography