Cargando…

Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?

Conservation physiology proposes that measures of physiological stress (glucocorticoid levels) can be used to assess the status and future fate of natural populations. Increases in glucocorticoids may reflect a more challenging environment, suggesting that the influence of human activities on free-l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dantzer, Ben, Fletcher, Quinn E., Boonstra, Rudy, Sheriff, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou023
_version_ 1782412711277101056
author Dantzer, Ben
Fletcher, Quinn E.
Boonstra, Rudy
Sheriff, Michael J.
author_facet Dantzer, Ben
Fletcher, Quinn E.
Boonstra, Rudy
Sheriff, Michael J.
author_sort Dantzer, Ben
collection PubMed
description Conservation physiology proposes that measures of physiological stress (glucocorticoid levels) can be used to assess the status and future fate of natural populations. Increases in glucocorticoids may reflect a more challenging environment, suggesting that the influence of human activities on free-living animals could be quantified by measuring glucocorticoids. Biomedical studies suggest that chronic increases in glucocorticoids can have detrimental effects on survival and reproduction, which could influence the viability of populations. Here, we discuss the use of measurements of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology. We first provide an overview of the different methods to quantify glucocorticoids and their utility in conservation physiology. We then discuss five questions we think are essential for conservation physiologists to address. We highlight how intrinsic (e.g. sex, reproductive status, age, recent experiences) and ecological factors (e.g. predation, food availability, snowfall) can, by themselves or through their interactions with anthropogenic disturbances, affect the physiological stress response and mask any general patterns about the effects of anthropogenic disturbances on glucocorticoids. Using a meta-analysis, we show that anthropogenic disturbances are consistently associated with increased glucocorticoids regardless of the type of human disturbance. We also show that males may be more sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances than females and that faecal glucocorticoids, but not baseline plasma glucocorticoids, consistently increase in response to anthropogenic disturbances. Finally, we discuss how increases in glucocorticoids in free-living animals can sometimes enhance survival and reproduction. Unfortunately, our literature analysis indicates that this observation has not yet gained traction, and very few studies have shown that increases in glucocorticoid levels resulting from anthropogenic disturbances decrease survival or reproduction. We think that the use of measures of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology has tremendous potential, but there are still a number of methodological concerns, in addition to several crucial questions that should be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4732472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47324722016-06-10 Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species? Dantzer, Ben Fletcher, Quinn E. Boonstra, Rudy Sheriff, Michael J. Conserv Physiol Reviews Conservation physiology proposes that measures of physiological stress (glucocorticoid levels) can be used to assess the status and future fate of natural populations. Increases in glucocorticoids may reflect a more challenging environment, suggesting that the influence of human activities on free-living animals could be quantified by measuring glucocorticoids. Biomedical studies suggest that chronic increases in glucocorticoids can have detrimental effects on survival and reproduction, which could influence the viability of populations. Here, we discuss the use of measurements of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology. We first provide an overview of the different methods to quantify glucocorticoids and their utility in conservation physiology. We then discuss five questions we think are essential for conservation physiologists to address. We highlight how intrinsic (e.g. sex, reproductive status, age, recent experiences) and ecological factors (e.g. predation, food availability, snowfall) can, by themselves or through their interactions with anthropogenic disturbances, affect the physiological stress response and mask any general patterns about the effects of anthropogenic disturbances on glucocorticoids. Using a meta-analysis, we show that anthropogenic disturbances are consistently associated with increased glucocorticoids regardless of the type of human disturbance. We also show that males may be more sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances than females and that faecal glucocorticoids, but not baseline plasma glucocorticoids, consistently increase in response to anthropogenic disturbances. Finally, we discuss how increases in glucocorticoids in free-living animals can sometimes enhance survival and reproduction. Unfortunately, our literature analysis indicates that this observation has not yet gained traction, and very few studies have shown that increases in glucocorticoid levels resulting from anthropogenic disturbances decrease survival or reproduction. We think that the use of measures of glucocorticoids in conservation physiology has tremendous potential, but there are still a number of methodological concerns, in addition to several crucial questions that should be addressed. Oxford University Press 2014-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4732472/ /pubmed/27293644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou023 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Dantzer, Ben
Fletcher, Quinn E.
Boonstra, Rudy
Sheriff, Michael J.
Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title_full Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title_fullStr Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title_full_unstemmed Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title_short Measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
title_sort measures of physiological stress: a transparent or opaque window into the status, management and conservation of species?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27293644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cou023
work_keys_str_mv AT dantzerben measuresofphysiologicalstressatransparentoropaquewindowintothestatusmanagementandconservationofspecies
AT fletcherquinne measuresofphysiologicalstressatransparentoropaquewindowintothestatusmanagementandconservationofspecies
AT boonstrarudy measuresofphysiologicalstressatransparentoropaquewindowintothestatusmanagementandconservationofspecies
AT sheriffmichaelj measuresofphysiologicalstressatransparentoropaquewindowintothestatusmanagementandconservationofspecies