Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs

Management and preservation of genomic diversity in dog breeds is a major objective for maintaining health. The present study was undertaken to characterise genomic diversity in Bullmastiff dogs using both genealogical and molecular analysis. Genealogical analysis of diversity was conducted using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortlock, Sally-Anne, Khatkar, Mehar S., Williamson, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26824579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147941
_version_ 1782412758850994176
author Mortlock, Sally-Anne
Khatkar, Mehar S.
Williamson, Peter
author_facet Mortlock, Sally-Anne
Khatkar, Mehar S.
Williamson, Peter
author_sort Mortlock, Sally-Anne
collection PubMed
description Management and preservation of genomic diversity in dog breeds is a major objective for maintaining health. The present study was undertaken to characterise genomic diversity in Bullmastiff dogs using both genealogical and molecular analysis. Genealogical analysis of diversity was conducted using a database consisting of 16,378 Bullmastiff pedigrees from year 1980 to 2013. Additionally, a total of 188 Bullmastiff dogs were genotyped using the 170,000 SNP Illumina CanineHD Beadchip. Genealogical parameters revealed a mean inbreeding coefficient of 0.047; 142 total founders (f); an effective number of founders (f(e)) of 79; an effective number of ancestors (f(a)) of 62; and an effective population size of the reference population of 41. Genetic diversity and the degree of genome-wide homogeneity within the breed were also investigated using molecular data. Multiple-locus heterozygosity (MLH) was equal to 0.206; runs of homozygosity (ROH) as proportion of the genome, averaged 16.44%; effective population size was 29.1, with an average inbreeding coefficient of 0.035, all estimated using SNP Data. Fine-scale population structure was analysed using NETVIEW, a population analysis pipeline. Visualisation of the high definition network captured relationships among individuals within and between subpopulations. Effects of unequal founder use, and ancestral inbreeding and selection, were evident. While current levels of Bullmastiff heterozygosity, inbreeding and homozygosity are not unusual, a relatively small effective population size indicates that a breeding strategy to reduce the inbreeding rate may be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4732815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47328152016-02-04 Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs Mortlock, Sally-Anne Khatkar, Mehar S. Williamson, Peter PLoS One Research Article Management and preservation of genomic diversity in dog breeds is a major objective for maintaining health. The present study was undertaken to characterise genomic diversity in Bullmastiff dogs using both genealogical and molecular analysis. Genealogical analysis of diversity was conducted using a database consisting of 16,378 Bullmastiff pedigrees from year 1980 to 2013. Additionally, a total of 188 Bullmastiff dogs were genotyped using the 170,000 SNP Illumina CanineHD Beadchip. Genealogical parameters revealed a mean inbreeding coefficient of 0.047; 142 total founders (f); an effective number of founders (f(e)) of 79; an effective number of ancestors (f(a)) of 62; and an effective population size of the reference population of 41. Genetic diversity and the degree of genome-wide homogeneity within the breed were also investigated using molecular data. Multiple-locus heterozygosity (MLH) was equal to 0.206; runs of homozygosity (ROH) as proportion of the genome, averaged 16.44%; effective population size was 29.1, with an average inbreeding coefficient of 0.035, all estimated using SNP Data. Fine-scale population structure was analysed using NETVIEW, a population analysis pipeline. Visualisation of the high definition network captured relationships among individuals within and between subpopulations. Effects of unequal founder use, and ancestral inbreeding and selection, were evident. While current levels of Bullmastiff heterozygosity, inbreeding and homozygosity are not unusual, a relatively small effective population size indicates that a breeding strategy to reduce the inbreeding rate may be beneficial. Public Library of Science 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4732815/ /pubmed/26824579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147941 Text en © 2016 Mortlock et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mortlock, Sally-Anne
Khatkar, Mehar S.
Williamson, Peter
Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title_full Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title_short Comparative Analysis of Genome Diversity in Bullmastiff Dogs
title_sort comparative analysis of genome diversity in bullmastiff dogs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4732815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26824579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147941
work_keys_str_mv AT mortlocksallyanne comparativeanalysisofgenomediversityinbullmastiffdogs
AT khatkarmehars comparativeanalysisofgenomediversityinbullmastiffdogs
AT williamsonpeter comparativeanalysisofgenomediversityinbullmastiffdogs