Cargando…

High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects

INTRODUCTION: Brain‐imaging techniques have begun to be popular in evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive intervention training. Although gamma activities are rarely used as an index of training effects, they have several characteristics that suggest their potential suitability for this purpose....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akimoto, Yoritaka, Nozawa, Takayuki, Kanno, Akitake, Kambara, Toshimune, Ihara, Mizuki, Ogawa, Takeshi, Goto, Takakuni, Taki, Yasuyuki, Yokoyama, Ryoichi, Kotozaki, Yuka, Nouchi, Rui, Sekiguchi, Atsushi, Takeuchi, Hikaru, Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto, Sugiura, Motoaki, Okumura, Eiichi, Sunda, Takashi, Shimizu, Toshiyuki, Tozuka, Eiji, Hirose, Satoru, Nanbu, Tatsuyoshi, Kawashima, Ryuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.427
_version_ 1782412796555689984
author Akimoto, Yoritaka
Nozawa, Takayuki
Kanno, Akitake
Kambara, Toshimune
Ihara, Mizuki
Ogawa, Takeshi
Goto, Takakuni
Taki, Yasuyuki
Yokoyama, Ryoichi
Kotozaki, Yuka
Nouchi, Rui
Sekiguchi, Atsushi
Takeuchi, Hikaru
Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto
Sugiura, Motoaki
Okumura, Eiichi
Sunda, Takashi
Shimizu, Toshiyuki
Tozuka, Eiji
Hirose, Satoru
Nanbu, Tatsuyoshi
Kawashima, Ryuta
author_facet Akimoto, Yoritaka
Nozawa, Takayuki
Kanno, Akitake
Kambara, Toshimune
Ihara, Mizuki
Ogawa, Takeshi
Goto, Takakuni
Taki, Yasuyuki
Yokoyama, Ryoichi
Kotozaki, Yuka
Nouchi, Rui
Sekiguchi, Atsushi
Takeuchi, Hikaru
Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto
Sugiura, Motoaki
Okumura, Eiichi
Sunda, Takashi
Shimizu, Toshiyuki
Tozuka, Eiji
Hirose, Satoru
Nanbu, Tatsuyoshi
Kawashima, Ryuta
author_sort Akimoto, Yoritaka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Brain‐imaging techniques have begun to be popular in evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive intervention training. Although gamma activities are rarely used as an index of training effects, they have several characteristics that suggest their potential suitability for this purpose. This pilot study examined whether cognitive training in elderly people affected the high‐gamma activity associated with attentional processing and whether high‐gamma power changes were related to changes in behavioral performance. METHODS: We analyzed (MEG) magnetoencephalography data obtained from 35 healthy elderly subjects (60–75 years old) who had participated in our previous intervention study in which the subjects were randomly assigned to one of the three types of intervention groups: Group V trained in a vehicle with a newly developed onboard cognitive training program, Group P trained with a similar program but on a personal computer, and Group C was trained to solve a crossword puzzle as an active control group. High‐gamma (52–100 Hz) activity during a three‐stimulus visual oddball task was measured before and after training. As a result of exclusion in the MEG data analysis stage, the final sample consisted of five subjects in Group V, nine subjects in Group P, and seven subjects in Group C. RESULTS: Results showed that high‐gamma activities were differently altered between groups after cognitive intervention. In particular, members of Group V, who showed significant improvements in cognitive function after training, exhibited increased high‐gamma power in the left middle frontal gyrus during top‐down anticipatory target processing. High‐gamma power changes in this region were also associated with changes in behavioral performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest the usefulness of high‐gamma activities as an index of the effectiveness of cognitive training in elderly subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4733105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47331052016-02-05 High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects Akimoto, Yoritaka Nozawa, Takayuki Kanno, Akitake Kambara, Toshimune Ihara, Mizuki Ogawa, Takeshi Goto, Takakuni Taki, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Ryoichi Kotozaki, Yuka Nouchi, Rui Sekiguchi, Atsushi Takeuchi, Hikaru Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto Sugiura, Motoaki Okumura, Eiichi Sunda, Takashi Shimizu, Toshiyuki Tozuka, Eiji Hirose, Satoru Nanbu, Tatsuyoshi Kawashima, Ryuta Brain Behav Original Research INTRODUCTION: Brain‐imaging techniques have begun to be popular in evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive intervention training. Although gamma activities are rarely used as an index of training effects, they have several characteristics that suggest their potential suitability for this purpose. This pilot study examined whether cognitive training in elderly people affected the high‐gamma activity associated with attentional processing and whether high‐gamma power changes were related to changes in behavioral performance. METHODS: We analyzed (MEG) magnetoencephalography data obtained from 35 healthy elderly subjects (60–75 years old) who had participated in our previous intervention study in which the subjects were randomly assigned to one of the three types of intervention groups: Group V trained in a vehicle with a newly developed onboard cognitive training program, Group P trained with a similar program but on a personal computer, and Group C was trained to solve a crossword puzzle as an active control group. High‐gamma (52–100 Hz) activity during a three‐stimulus visual oddball task was measured before and after training. As a result of exclusion in the MEG data analysis stage, the final sample consisted of five subjects in Group V, nine subjects in Group P, and seven subjects in Group C. RESULTS: Results showed that high‐gamma activities were differently altered between groups after cognitive intervention. In particular, members of Group V, who showed significant improvements in cognitive function after training, exhibited increased high‐gamma power in the left middle frontal gyrus during top‐down anticipatory target processing. High‐gamma power changes in this region were also associated with changes in behavioral performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest the usefulness of high‐gamma activities as an index of the effectiveness of cognitive training in elderly subjects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4733105/ /pubmed/26855826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.427 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Akimoto, Yoritaka
Nozawa, Takayuki
Kanno, Akitake
Kambara, Toshimune
Ihara, Mizuki
Ogawa, Takeshi
Goto, Takakuni
Taki, Yasuyuki
Yokoyama, Ryoichi
Kotozaki, Yuka
Nouchi, Rui
Sekiguchi, Atsushi
Takeuchi, Hikaru
Miyauchi, Carlos Makoto
Sugiura, Motoaki
Okumura, Eiichi
Sunda, Takashi
Shimizu, Toshiyuki
Tozuka, Eiji
Hirose, Satoru
Nanbu, Tatsuyoshi
Kawashima, Ryuta
High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title_full High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title_fullStr High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title_full_unstemmed High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title_short High‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
title_sort high‐gamma power changes after cognitive intervention: preliminary results from twenty‐one senior adult subjects
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26855826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.427
work_keys_str_mv AT akimotoyoritaka highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT nozawatakayuki highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT kannoakitake highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT kambaratoshimune highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT iharamizuki highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT ogawatakeshi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT gototakakuni highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT takiyasuyuki highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT yokoyamaryoichi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT kotozakiyuka highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT nouchirui highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT sekiguchiatsushi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT takeuchihikaru highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT miyauchicarlosmakoto highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT sugiuramotoaki highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT okumuraeiichi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT sundatakashi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT shimizutoshiyuki highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT tozukaeiji highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT hirosesatoru highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT nanbutatsuyoshi highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects
AT kawashimaryuta highgammapowerchangesaftercognitiveinterventionpreliminaryresultsfromtwentyonesenioradultsubjects