Cargando…
Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures
While advancements have been made in some areas of pathology with diagnostic materials being screened using image analysis technologies, the reporting of cultures from agar plates remains a manual process. We compared the results for 2,163 urine cultures read by a reference panel of microbiologists,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02365-15 |
_version_ | 1782412803986948096 |
---|---|
author | Glasson, John Hill, Rhys Summerford, Michael Giglio, Steven |
author_facet | Glasson, John Hill, Rhys Summerford, Michael Giglio, Steven |
author_sort | Glasson, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | While advancements have been made in some areas of pathology with diagnostic materials being screened using image analysis technologies, the reporting of cultures from agar plates remains a manual process. We compared the results for 2,163 urine cultures read by a reference panel of microbiologists, by the routine laboratory process, and by an automated plate reading system, APAS (LBT Innovations Ltd., South Australia). APAS detected colonies with a sensitivity of 99.1% and a specificity of 99.3% on blood agar, while on MacConkey agar, the colony detection sensitivity was 99.4% with a specificity of 99.3%. The device's ability to enumerate growth had an accuracy of 89.2%, and the morphological identification of colonies showed a high level of performance for the colony types typical of Escherichia coli and other enteric bacilli. On blood agar, lactose-fermenting colonies were morphologically identified with a sensitivity of 98.9%, while on MacConkey agar they were identified with a sensitivity of 99.2%. In this first clinical evaluation, APAS demonstrated high performance in the detection, enumeration, and colony classification of isolates compared with that for conventional plate-reading methods. The device found all cases reported by the laboratory and detected the most commonly encountered organisms found in urinary tract infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4733208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47332082016-02-13 Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures Glasson, John Hill, Rhys Summerford, Michael Giglio, Steven J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology While advancements have been made in some areas of pathology with diagnostic materials being screened using image analysis technologies, the reporting of cultures from agar plates remains a manual process. We compared the results for 2,163 urine cultures read by a reference panel of microbiologists, by the routine laboratory process, and by an automated plate reading system, APAS (LBT Innovations Ltd., South Australia). APAS detected colonies with a sensitivity of 99.1% and a specificity of 99.3% on blood agar, while on MacConkey agar, the colony detection sensitivity was 99.4% with a specificity of 99.3%. The device's ability to enumerate growth had an accuracy of 89.2%, and the morphological identification of colonies showed a high level of performance for the colony types typical of Escherichia coli and other enteric bacilli. On blood agar, lactose-fermenting colonies were morphologically identified with a sensitivity of 98.9%, while on MacConkey agar they were identified with a sensitivity of 99.2%. In this first clinical evaluation, APAS demonstrated high performance in the detection, enumeration, and colony classification of isolates compared with that for conventional plate-reading methods. The device found all cases reported by the laboratory and detected the most commonly encountered organisms found in urinary tract infections. American Society for Microbiology 2016-01-28 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4733208/ /pubmed/26582838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02365-15 Text en Copyright © 2016 Glasson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) , which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Bacteriology Glasson, John Hill, Rhys Summerford, Michael Giglio, Steven Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title | Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title_full | Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title_short | Evaluation of an Image Analysis Device (APAS) for Screening Urine Cultures |
title_sort | evaluation of an image analysis device (apas) for screening urine cultures |
topic | Bacteriology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02365-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glassonjohn evaluationofanimageanalysisdeviceapasforscreeningurinecultures AT hillrhys evaluationofanimageanalysisdeviceapasforscreeningurinecultures AT summerfordmichael evaluationofanimageanalysisdeviceapasforscreeningurinecultures AT gigliosteven evaluationofanimageanalysisdeviceapasforscreeningurinecultures |