Cargando…
Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences
BACKGROUND: The United States government is encouraging physicians to adopt patient portals—secure websites that allow patients to access their health information. For patient portals to recognize their full potential and improve patient care, health care providers’ acceptance and encouragement of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26772771 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4953 |
_version_ | 1782412805545132032 |
---|---|
author | Miller Jr, David P Latulipe, Celine Melius, Kathryn A Quandt, Sara A Arcury, Thomas A |
author_facet | Miller Jr, David P Latulipe, Celine Melius, Kathryn A Quandt, Sara A Arcury, Thomas A |
author_sort | Miller Jr, David P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The United States government is encouraging physicians to adopt patient portals—secure websites that allow patients to access their health information. For patient portals to recognize their full potential and improve patient care, health care providers’ acceptance and encouragement of their use will be essential. However, little is known about provider concerns or views of patient portals. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this qualitative study to determine how administrators, clinic staff, and health care providers at practices serving a lower income adult population viewed patient portals in terms of their potential benefit, areas of concern, and hopes for the future. METHODS: We performed in-depth interviews between October 2013 and June 2014 with 20 clinic personnel recruited from health centers in four North Carolina counties. Trained study personnel conducted individual interviews following an interviewer guide to elicit perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of patient portals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Research team members reviewed transcribed interviews for major themes to construct a coding dictionary. Two researchers then coded each transcript with any coding discrepancies resolved through discussion. RESULTS: The interviews revealed that clinic personnel viewed patient portals as a mandated product that had potential to improve communication and enhance information sharing. However, they expressed many concerns including portals’ potential to generate more work, confuse patients, alienate non-users, and increase health disparities. Clinic personnel expected few older and disadvantaged patients to use a portal. CONCLUSIONS: Given that clinic personnel have significant concerns about portals’ unintended consequences, their uptake and impact on care may be limited. Future studies should examine ways portals can be implemented in practices to address providers’ concerns and meet the needs of vulnerable populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4733220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47332202016-02-16 Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences Miller Jr, David P Latulipe, Celine Melius, Kathryn A Quandt, Sara A Arcury, Thomas A J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The United States government is encouraging physicians to adopt patient portals—secure websites that allow patients to access their health information. For patient portals to recognize their full potential and improve patient care, health care providers’ acceptance and encouragement of their use will be essential. However, little is known about provider concerns or views of patient portals. OBJECTIVE: We conducted this qualitative study to determine how administrators, clinic staff, and health care providers at practices serving a lower income adult population viewed patient portals in terms of their potential benefit, areas of concern, and hopes for the future. METHODS: We performed in-depth interviews between October 2013 and June 2014 with 20 clinic personnel recruited from health centers in four North Carolina counties. Trained study personnel conducted individual interviews following an interviewer guide to elicit perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of patient portals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Research team members reviewed transcribed interviews for major themes to construct a coding dictionary. Two researchers then coded each transcript with any coding discrepancies resolved through discussion. RESULTS: The interviews revealed that clinic personnel viewed patient portals as a mandated product that had potential to improve communication and enhance information sharing. However, they expressed many concerns including portals’ potential to generate more work, confuse patients, alienate non-users, and increase health disparities. Clinic personnel expected few older and disadvantaged patients to use a portal. CONCLUSIONS: Given that clinic personnel have significant concerns about portals’ unintended consequences, their uptake and impact on care may be limited. Future studies should examine ways portals can be implemented in practices to address providers’ concerns and meet the needs of vulnerable populations. JMIR Publications Inc. 2016-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4733220/ /pubmed/26772771 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4953 Text en ©David P Miller Jr, Celine Latulipe, Kathryn A Melius, Sara A Quandt, Thomas A Arcury. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.01.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Miller Jr, David P Latulipe, Celine Melius, Kathryn A Quandt, Sara A Arcury, Thomas A Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title | Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title_full | Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title_fullStr | Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title_short | Primary Care Providers’ Views of Patient Portals: Interview Study of Perceived Benefits and Consequences |
title_sort | primary care providers’ views of patient portals: interview study of perceived benefits and consequences |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26772771 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerjrdavidp primarycareprovidersviewsofpatientportalsinterviewstudyofperceivedbenefitsandconsequences AT latulipeceline primarycareprovidersviewsofpatientportalsinterviewstudyofperceivedbenefitsandconsequences AT meliuskathryna primarycareprovidersviewsofpatientportalsinterviewstudyofperceivedbenefitsandconsequences AT quandtsaraa primarycareprovidersviewsofpatientportalsinterviewstudyofperceivedbenefitsandconsequences AT arcurythomasa primarycareprovidersviewsofpatientportalsinterviewstudyofperceivedbenefitsandconsequences |