Cargando…

Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery are unknown. The objectives were to investigate whether NMES prevents loss of muscle layer thickness (MLT) and strength and to observe the time variation of MLT and strength...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Arabella, Spiegl, Matthias, Altmann, Klaus, Winkler, Andreas, Salamon, Anna, Themessl-Huber, Michael, Mouhieddine, Mohamed, Strasser, Eva Maria, Schiferer, Arno, Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana, Hiesmayr, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1199-3
_version_ 1782412809689104384
author Fischer, Arabella
Spiegl, Matthias
Altmann, Klaus
Winkler, Andreas
Salamon, Anna
Themessl-Huber, Michael
Mouhieddine, Mohamed
Strasser, Eva Maria
Schiferer, Arno
Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana
Hiesmayr, Michael
author_facet Fischer, Arabella
Spiegl, Matthias
Altmann, Klaus
Winkler, Andreas
Salamon, Anna
Themessl-Huber, Michael
Mouhieddine, Mohamed
Strasser, Eva Maria
Schiferer, Arno
Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana
Hiesmayr, Michael
author_sort Fischer, Arabella
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery are unknown. The objectives were to investigate whether NMES prevents loss of muscle layer thickness (MLT) and strength and to observe the time variation of MLT and strength from preoperative day to hospital discharge. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 54 critically ill patients were randomized into four strata based on the SAPS II score. Patients were blinded to the intervention. In the intervention group, quadriceps muscles were electrically stimulated bilaterally from the first postoperative day until ICU discharge for a maximum of 14 days. In the control group, the electrodes were applied, but no electricity was delivered. The primary outcomes were MLT measured by ultrasonography and muscle strength evaluated with the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. The secondary functional outcomes were average mobility level, FIM score, Timed Up and Go Test and SF-12 health survey. Additional variables of interest were grip strength and the relation between fluid balance and MLT. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of NMES on MLT, MRC score and grip strength. RESULTS: NMES had no significant effect on MLT. Patients in the NMES group regained muscle strength 4.5 times faster than patients in the control group. During the first three postoperative days, there was a positive correlation between change in MLT and cumulative fluid balance (r = 0.43, P = 0.01). At hospital discharge, all patients regained preoperative levels of muscle strength, but not of MLT. Patients did not regain their preoperative levels of average mobility (P = 0.04) and FIM score (P = 0.02) at hospital discharge, independent of group allocation. CONCLUSIONS: NMES had no effect on MLT, but was associated with a higher rate in regaining muscle strength during the ICU stay. Regression of intramuscular edema during the ICU stay interfered with measurement of changes in MLT. At hospital discharge patients had regained preoperative levels of muscle strength, but still showed residual functional disability and decreased MLT compared to pre-ICU levels in both groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02391103. Registered on 7 March 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1199-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4733279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47332792016-01-31 Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial Fischer, Arabella Spiegl, Matthias Altmann, Klaus Winkler, Andreas Salamon, Anna Themessl-Huber, Michael Mouhieddine, Mohamed Strasser, Eva Maria Schiferer, Arno Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana Hiesmayr, Michael Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery are unknown. The objectives were to investigate whether NMES prevents loss of muscle layer thickness (MLT) and strength and to observe the time variation of MLT and strength from preoperative day to hospital discharge. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 54 critically ill patients were randomized into four strata based on the SAPS II score. Patients were blinded to the intervention. In the intervention group, quadriceps muscles were electrically stimulated bilaterally from the first postoperative day until ICU discharge for a maximum of 14 days. In the control group, the electrodes were applied, but no electricity was delivered. The primary outcomes were MLT measured by ultrasonography and muscle strength evaluated with the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale. The secondary functional outcomes were average mobility level, FIM score, Timed Up and Go Test and SF-12 health survey. Additional variables of interest were grip strength and the relation between fluid balance and MLT. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of NMES on MLT, MRC score and grip strength. RESULTS: NMES had no significant effect on MLT. Patients in the NMES group regained muscle strength 4.5 times faster than patients in the control group. During the first three postoperative days, there was a positive correlation between change in MLT and cumulative fluid balance (r = 0.43, P = 0.01). At hospital discharge, all patients regained preoperative levels of muscle strength, but not of MLT. Patients did not regain their preoperative levels of average mobility (P = 0.04) and FIM score (P = 0.02) at hospital discharge, independent of group allocation. CONCLUSIONS: NMES had no effect on MLT, but was associated with a higher rate in regaining muscle strength during the ICU stay. Regression of intramuscular edema during the ICU stay interfered with measurement of changes in MLT. At hospital discharge patients had regained preoperative levels of muscle strength, but still showed residual functional disability and decreased MLT compared to pre-ICU levels in both groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02391103. Registered on 7 March 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1199-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4733279/ /pubmed/26825278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1199-3 Text en © Fischer et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fischer, Arabella
Spiegl, Matthias
Altmann, Klaus
Winkler, Andreas
Salamon, Anna
Themessl-Huber, Michael
Mouhieddine, Mohamed
Strasser, Eva Maria
Schiferer, Arno
Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana
Hiesmayr, Michael
Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title_full Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title_short Muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? The Catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
title_sort muscle mass, strength and functional outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiothoracic surgery: does neuromuscular electrical stimulation help? the catastim 2 randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26825278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1199-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerarabella musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT spieglmatthias musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT altmannklaus musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT winklerandreas musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT salamonanna musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT themesslhubermichael musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mouhieddinemohamed musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT strasserevamaria musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schifererarno musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paternostroslugatatjana musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hiesmayrmichael musclemassstrengthandfunctionaloutcomesincriticallyillpatientsaftercardiothoracicsurgerydoesneuromuscularelectricalstimulationhelpthecatastim2randomizedcontrolledtrial