Cargando…

Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Study Design Case study. Objective To describe a case of dislodgment and migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee, United States) arthroplasty more than 6 months after implantation secondary to low-energy trauma. Methods The inpatient, outpatient, and radiogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Scott C., Kang, Daniel G., Helgeson, Melvin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26835211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1550092
_version_ 1782412821946957824
author Wagner, Scott C.
Kang, Daniel G.
Helgeson, Melvin D.
author_facet Wagner, Scott C.
Kang, Daniel G.
Helgeson, Melvin D.
author_sort Wagner, Scott C.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Case study. Objective To describe a case of dislodgment and migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee, United States) arthroplasty more than 6 months after implantation secondary to low-energy trauma. Methods The inpatient, outpatient, and radiographic medical records of a patient with traumatic migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty were reviewed. The authors have no relevant disclosures to report. Results A 36-year-old man with chronic left upper extremity radiculopathy underwent uncomplicated Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty at C5–C6, with complete resolution of his symptoms. Approximately 6 months after his index procedure, he sustained low-energy trauma to the posterior cervical spine, after being struck by a book falling from a shelf. The injury forced his neck into flexion, and though he did not have recurrence of his radiculopathy symptoms, radiographs demonstrated anterior migration of the arthroplasty device. He underwent revision to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Conclusions Although extremely rare, it is imperative that surgeons consider the potential for failure of osseous integration in patients undergoing cervical disk arthroplasty, even beyond 3 to 6 months postoperatively. This concern is especially relevant to press-fit or milled devices like the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty, which lack direct fixation into adjacent vertebral bodies. We are considering modification of our postoperative protocol to improve protection of the device after implantation, even beyond 3 months postoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4733374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47333742016-02-01 Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Wagner, Scott C. Kang, Daniel G. Helgeson, Melvin D. Global Spine J Article Study Design Case study. Objective To describe a case of dislodgment and migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee, United States) arthroplasty more than 6 months after implantation secondary to low-energy trauma. Methods The inpatient, outpatient, and radiographic medical records of a patient with traumatic migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty were reviewed. The authors have no relevant disclosures to report. Results A 36-year-old man with chronic left upper extremity radiculopathy underwent uncomplicated Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty at C5–C6, with complete resolution of his symptoms. Approximately 6 months after his index procedure, he sustained low-energy trauma to the posterior cervical spine, after being struck by a book falling from a shelf. The injury forced his neck into flexion, and though he did not have recurrence of his radiculopathy symptoms, radiographs demonstrated anterior migration of the arthroplasty device. He underwent revision to anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Conclusions Although extremely rare, it is imperative that surgeons consider the potential for failure of osseous integration in patients undergoing cervical disk arthroplasty, even beyond 3 to 6 months postoperatively. This concern is especially relevant to press-fit or milled devices like the Bryan Cervical Disc arthroplasty, which lack direct fixation into adjacent vertebral bodies. We are considering modification of our postoperative protocol to improve protection of the device after implantation, even beyond 3 months postoperatively. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-04-23 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4733374/ /pubmed/26835211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1550092 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Wagner, Scott C.
Kang, Daniel G.
Helgeson, Melvin D.
Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title_full Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title_short Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
title_sort traumatic migration of the bryan cervical disc arthroplasty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26835211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1550092
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerscottc traumaticmigrationofthebryancervicaldiscarthroplasty
AT kangdanielg traumaticmigrationofthebryancervicaldiscarthroplasty
AT helgesonmelvind traumaticmigrationofthebryancervicaldiscarthroplasty