Cargando…

A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe

The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miravitlles, Marc, Vogelmeier, Claus, Roche, Nicolas, Halpin, David, Cardoso, João, Chuchalin, Alexander G., Kankaanranta, Hannu, Sandström, Thomas, Śliwiński, Paweł, Zatloukal, Jaromir, Blasi, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015
_version_ 1782412838366609408
author Miravitlles, Marc
Vogelmeier, Claus
Roche, Nicolas
Halpin, David
Cardoso, João
Chuchalin, Alexander G.
Kankaanranta, Hannu
Sandström, Thomas
Śliwiński, Paweł
Zatloukal, Jaromir
Blasi, Francesco
author_facet Miravitlles, Marc
Vogelmeier, Claus
Roche, Nicolas
Halpin, David
Cardoso, João
Chuchalin, Alexander G.
Kankaanranta, Hannu
Sandström, Thomas
Śliwiński, Paweł
Zatloukal, Jaromir
Blasi, Francesco
author_sort Miravitlles, Marc
collection PubMed
description The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators. There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4733567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47335672016-02-02 A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe Miravitlles, Marc Vogelmeier, Claus Roche, Nicolas Halpin, David Cardoso, João Chuchalin, Alexander G. Kankaanranta, Hannu Sandström, Thomas Śliwiński, Paweł Zatloukal, Jaromir Blasi, Francesco Eur Respir J Review The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators. There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments. European Respiratory Society 2016-02 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4733567/ /pubmed/26797035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Review
Miravitlles, Marc
Vogelmeier, Claus
Roche, Nicolas
Halpin, David
Cardoso, João
Chuchalin, Alexander G.
Kankaanranta, Hannu
Sandström, Thomas
Śliwiński, Paweł
Zatloukal, Jaromir
Blasi, Francesco
A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title_full A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title_fullStr A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title_full_unstemmed A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title_short A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
title_sort review of national guidelines for management of copd in europe
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015
work_keys_str_mv AT miravitllesmarc areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT vogelmeierclaus areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT rochenicolas areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT halpindavid areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT cardosojoao areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT chuchalinalexanderg areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT kankaanrantahannu areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT sandstromthomas areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT sliwinskipaweł areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT zatloukaljaromir areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT blasifrancesco areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT miravitllesmarc reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT vogelmeierclaus reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT rochenicolas reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT halpindavid reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT cardosojoao reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT chuchalinalexanderg reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT kankaanrantahannu reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT sandstromthomas reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT sliwinskipaweł reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT zatloukaljaromir reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope
AT blasifrancesco reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope