Cargando…
A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe
The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment gui...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015 |
_version_ | 1782412838366609408 |
---|---|
author | Miravitlles, Marc Vogelmeier, Claus Roche, Nicolas Halpin, David Cardoso, João Chuchalin, Alexander G. Kankaanranta, Hannu Sandström, Thomas Śliwiński, Paweł Zatloukal, Jaromir Blasi, Francesco |
author_facet | Miravitlles, Marc Vogelmeier, Claus Roche, Nicolas Halpin, David Cardoso, João Chuchalin, Alexander G. Kankaanranta, Hannu Sandström, Thomas Śliwiński, Paweł Zatloukal, Jaromir Blasi, Francesco |
author_sort | Miravitlles, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators. There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4733567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47335672016-02-02 A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe Miravitlles, Marc Vogelmeier, Claus Roche, Nicolas Halpin, David Cardoso, João Chuchalin, Alexander G. Kankaanranta, Hannu Sandström, Thomas Śliwiński, Paweł Zatloukal, Jaromir Blasi, Francesco Eur Respir J Review The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them. This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators. There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments. European Respiratory Society 2016-02 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4733567/ /pubmed/26797035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Review Miravitlles, Marc Vogelmeier, Claus Roche, Nicolas Halpin, David Cardoso, João Chuchalin, Alexander G. Kankaanranta, Hannu Sandström, Thomas Śliwiński, Paweł Zatloukal, Jaromir Blasi, Francesco A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title | A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title_full | A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title_fullStr | A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title_short | A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe |
title_sort | review of national guidelines for management of copd in europe |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01170-2015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miravitllesmarc areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT vogelmeierclaus areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT rochenicolas areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT halpindavid areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT cardosojoao areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT chuchalinalexanderg areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT kankaanrantahannu areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT sandstromthomas areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT sliwinskipaweł areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT zatloukaljaromir areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT blasifrancesco areviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT miravitllesmarc reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT vogelmeierclaus reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT rochenicolas reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT halpindavid reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT cardosojoao reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT chuchalinalexanderg reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT kankaanrantahannu reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT sandstromthomas reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT sliwinskipaweł reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT zatloukaljaromir reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope AT blasifrancesco reviewofnationalguidelinesformanagementofcopdineurope |