Cargando…

Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans

Deliberately eating at a slower pace promotes satiation and eating quickly has been associated with a higher body mass index. Therefore, understanding factors that affect eating rate should be given high priority. Eating rate is affected by the physical/textural properties of a food, by motivational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Laura L., Ferriday, Danielle, Bosworth, Matthew L., Godinot, Nicolas, Martin, Nathalie, Rogers, Peter J., Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26828922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147603
_version_ 1782412922571456512
author Wilkinson, Laura L.
Ferriday, Danielle
Bosworth, Matthew L.
Godinot, Nicolas
Martin, Nathalie
Rogers, Peter J.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Wilkinson, Laura L.
Ferriday, Danielle
Bosworth, Matthew L.
Godinot, Nicolas
Martin, Nathalie
Rogers, Peter J.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.
author_sort Wilkinson, Laura L.
collection PubMed
description Deliberately eating at a slower pace promotes satiation and eating quickly has been associated with a higher body mass index. Therefore, understanding factors that affect eating rate should be given high priority. Eating rate is affected by the physical/textural properties of a food, by motivational state, and by portion size and palatability. This study explored the prospect that eating rate is also influenced by a hitherto unexplored cognitive process that uses ongoing perceptual estimates of the volume of food remaining in a container to adjust intake during a meal. A 2 (amount seen; 300ml or 500ml) x 2 (amount eaten; 300ml or 500ml) between-subjects design was employed (10 participants in each condition). In two ‘congruent’ conditions, the same amount was seen at the outset and then subsequently consumed (300ml or 500ml). To dissociate visual feedback of portion size and actual amount consumed, food was covertly added or removed from a bowl using a peristaltic pump. This created two additional ‘incongruent’ conditions, in which 300ml was seen but 500ml was eaten or vice versa. We repeated these conditions using a savoury soup and a sweet dessert. Eating rate (ml per second) was assessed during lunch. After lunch we assessed fullness over a 60-minute period. In the congruent conditions, eating rate was unaffected by the actual volume of food that was consumed (300ml or 500ml). By contrast, we observed a marked difference across the incongruent conditions. Specifically, participants who saw 300ml but actually consumed 500ml ate at a faster rate than participants who saw 500ml but actually consumed 300ml. Participants were unaware that their portion size had been manipulated. Nevertheless, when it disappeared faster or slower than anticipated they adjusted their rate of eating accordingly. This suggests that the control of eating rate involves visual feedback and is not a simple reflexive response to orosensory stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4734439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47344392016-02-04 Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans Wilkinson, Laura L. Ferriday, Danielle Bosworth, Matthew L. Godinot, Nicolas Martin, Nathalie Rogers, Peter J. Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. PLoS One Research Article Deliberately eating at a slower pace promotes satiation and eating quickly has been associated with a higher body mass index. Therefore, understanding factors that affect eating rate should be given high priority. Eating rate is affected by the physical/textural properties of a food, by motivational state, and by portion size and palatability. This study explored the prospect that eating rate is also influenced by a hitherto unexplored cognitive process that uses ongoing perceptual estimates of the volume of food remaining in a container to adjust intake during a meal. A 2 (amount seen; 300ml or 500ml) x 2 (amount eaten; 300ml or 500ml) between-subjects design was employed (10 participants in each condition). In two ‘congruent’ conditions, the same amount was seen at the outset and then subsequently consumed (300ml or 500ml). To dissociate visual feedback of portion size and actual amount consumed, food was covertly added or removed from a bowl using a peristaltic pump. This created two additional ‘incongruent’ conditions, in which 300ml was seen but 500ml was eaten or vice versa. We repeated these conditions using a savoury soup and a sweet dessert. Eating rate (ml per second) was assessed during lunch. After lunch we assessed fullness over a 60-minute period. In the congruent conditions, eating rate was unaffected by the actual volume of food that was consumed (300ml or 500ml). By contrast, we observed a marked difference across the incongruent conditions. Specifically, participants who saw 300ml but actually consumed 500ml ate at a faster rate than participants who saw 500ml but actually consumed 300ml. Participants were unaware that their portion size had been manipulated. Nevertheless, when it disappeared faster or slower than anticipated they adjusted their rate of eating accordingly. This suggests that the control of eating rate involves visual feedback and is not a simple reflexive response to orosensory stimulation. Public Library of Science 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4734439/ /pubmed/26828922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147603 Text en © 2016 Wilkinson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilkinson, Laura L.
Ferriday, Danielle
Bosworth, Matthew L.
Godinot, Nicolas
Martin, Nathalie
Rogers, Peter J.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.
Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title_full Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title_fullStr Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title_full_unstemmed Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title_short Keeping Pace with Your Eating: Visual Feedback Affects Eating Rate in Humans
title_sort keeping pace with your eating: visual feedback affects eating rate in humans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26828922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147603
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonlaural keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT ferridaydanielle keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT bosworthmatthewl keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT godinotnicolas keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT martinnathalie keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT rogerspeterj keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans
AT brunstromjeffreym keepingpacewithyoureatingvisualfeedbackaffectseatingrateinhumans