Cargando…

Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex chronic illness requiring continued medical care. During the past decade, the therapeutic options for RA have increased significantly; these often have a higher risk of adverse effects and are more expensive than traditional drugs. Rheumatologists m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoki, Akiko, Ohbu, Sadayoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869774
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S95346
_version_ 1782412976518594560
author Aoki, Akiko
Ohbu, Sadayoshi
author_facet Aoki, Akiko
Ohbu, Sadayoshi
author_sort Aoki, Akiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex chronic illness requiring continued medical care. During the past decade, the therapeutic options for RA have increased significantly; these often have a higher risk of adverse effects and are more expensive than traditional drugs. Rheumatologists may hence face difficulties when deciding on the optimal modality in initiating or changing treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the Japanese physicians’ usual style of and preferences for decision making regarding RA treatment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted using an Internet survey. Respondents were asked about their usual style of making treatment decisions (perceived style), and their perception of the importance of physicians’ actions and patients’ attitudes. RESULTS: Of the 485 physicians who were sent the questionnaire, 157 responded completely (response rate: 32.3%). Ninety-two percent of the respondents were men, and 57% were clinicians with more than 20 years of experience. Their specialties were general medicine (29%), rheumatology (27%), orthopedics (31%), and rehabilitation (12%). Sixty-one (39%) stated that they usually presented multiple treatment options to their patients and selected a decision for them, 42 (27%) shared the decision making with their patients, 34 (22%) let their patients choose the treatment, and 20 (13%) made the treatment decision for the patients. Physicians using the shared decision making (SDM) style desired for their patients to have supportive family and friends, to discuss with nurses, and to follow the doctors’ directions more strongly compared with physicians using the other styles. There were no significant differences in sex, duration of clinical experience, major place of clinical work, and number of patients per month by the styles. More number of rheumatologists and physicians with specialist qualifications stated that they practiced SDM. CONCLUSION: To enhance patient participation, physicians need to recognize the importance of discussing treatment options with patients in addition to giving them information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4734810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47348102016-02-11 Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment Aoki, Akiko Ohbu, Sadayoshi Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex chronic illness requiring continued medical care. During the past decade, the therapeutic options for RA have increased significantly; these often have a higher risk of adverse effects and are more expensive than traditional drugs. Rheumatologists may hence face difficulties when deciding on the optimal modality in initiating or changing treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the Japanese physicians’ usual style of and preferences for decision making regarding RA treatment. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted using an Internet survey. Respondents were asked about their usual style of making treatment decisions (perceived style), and their perception of the importance of physicians’ actions and patients’ attitudes. RESULTS: Of the 485 physicians who were sent the questionnaire, 157 responded completely (response rate: 32.3%). Ninety-two percent of the respondents were men, and 57% were clinicians with more than 20 years of experience. Their specialties were general medicine (29%), rheumatology (27%), orthopedics (31%), and rehabilitation (12%). Sixty-one (39%) stated that they usually presented multiple treatment options to their patients and selected a decision for them, 42 (27%) shared the decision making with their patients, 34 (22%) let their patients choose the treatment, and 20 (13%) made the treatment decision for the patients. Physicians using the shared decision making (SDM) style desired for their patients to have supportive family and friends, to discuss with nurses, and to follow the doctors’ directions more strongly compared with physicians using the other styles. There were no significant differences in sex, duration of clinical experience, major place of clinical work, and number of patients per month by the styles. More number of rheumatologists and physicians with specialist qualifications stated that they practiced SDM. CONCLUSION: To enhance patient participation, physicians need to recognize the importance of discussing treatment options with patients in addition to giving them information. Dove Medical Press 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4734810/ /pubmed/26869774 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S95346 Text en © 2016 Aoki and Ohbu. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Aoki, Akiko
Ohbu, Sadayoshi
Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title_full Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title_fullStr Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title_full_unstemmed Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title_short Japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
title_sort japanese physicians’ preferences for decision making in rheumatoid arthritis treatment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869774
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S95346
work_keys_str_mv AT aokiakiko japanesephysicianspreferencesfordecisionmakinginrheumatoidarthritistreatment
AT ohbusadayoshi japanesephysicianspreferencesfordecisionmakinginrheumatoidarthritistreatment