Cargando…

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies, and to develop a consistent and comprehensive approach to defining (non-) dissemination of research findings. SETTING: We performed a scoping review of definitions of the term ‘publication b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bassler, Dirk, Mueller, Katharina F, Briel, Matthias, Kleijnen, Jos, Marusic, Ana, Wager, Elizabeth, Antes, Gerd, von Elm, Erik, Altman, Douglas G, Meerpohl, Joerg J
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:	Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26801469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010024

Ejemplares similares

Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework
por: Müller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods
por: Mueller, Katharina Felicitas, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Dissemination Bias in Systematic Reviews of Animal Research: A Systematic Review
por: Mueller, Katharina F., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
por: Briel, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Correction: Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals
por: Rohwer, Anke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Editors’ and authors’ individual conflicts of interest disclosure and journal transparency. A cross-sectional study of high-impact medical specialty journals
por: Dal-Ré, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
por: Blümle, Anette, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Involving clinical experts in prioritising topics for health technology assessment: a randomised controlled trial
por: Cook, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study
por: Gattrell, William T, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey
por: Toews, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quantitative investigation of inappropriate regression model construction and the importance of medical statistics experts in observational medical research: a cross-sectional study
por: Nojima, Masanori, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The bias of adapted patients in practice
por: Mosquera, Julia
Publicado: (2021)

Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
por: Blanco, David, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methods and results used in the development of a consensus-driven extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE)
por: Imran, Mahrukh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Bias adjustment and the nature of health-state utility
por: Menzel, Paul T
Publicado: (2020)

The role of social prescribers in wales: a consensus methods study
por: Roberts, T, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Early analysis of deemed consent: why Moorlock’s critique is mistaken
por: Parsons, Jordan A
Publicado: (2021)

Premature presumptions about presumed consent: why Parsons’ comparison is mistaken
por: Moorlock, Greg
Publicado: (2021)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomised controlled trials
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Peer Review of “In-hospital Mortality and the Predictive Ability of the Modified Early Warning Score in Ghana: Single-Center, Retrospective Study”
por: Marusic, Ana
Publicado: (2021)

Tamoxifen for the management of breast events induced by non-steroidal antiandrogens in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
por: Kunath, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
por: Krnic Martinic, Marina, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Changes in the Coating Composition Due to APS Process Conditions for Al(2)O(3)-Cr(2)O(3)-TiO(2) Ternary Powder Blends
por: Grimm, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review
por: Schmucker, Christine, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study
por: Vinther, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
por: Gill, Christopher J
Publicado: (2012)

Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional study
por: Earley, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_h50b99jcr79nm0r3ntuukrl0m5