Cargando…

Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods

OBJECTIVES: (A) To gain insights into the experiences of patients invited to view their doctors’ visit notes, with a focus on those who review multiple notes; (B) to examine the relationships among fully transparent electronic medical records and quality of care, the patient-doctor relationship, pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esch, Tobias, Mejilla, Roanne, Anselmo, Melissa, Podtschaske, Beatrice, Delbanco, Tom, Walker, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034
_version_ 1782413025703100416
author Esch, Tobias
Mejilla, Roanne
Anselmo, Melissa
Podtschaske, Beatrice
Delbanco, Tom
Walker, Jan
author_facet Esch, Tobias
Mejilla, Roanne
Anselmo, Melissa
Podtschaske, Beatrice
Delbanco, Tom
Walker, Jan
author_sort Esch, Tobias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (A) To gain insights into the experiences of patients invited to view their doctors’ visit notes, with a focus on those who review multiple notes; (B) to examine the relationships among fully transparent electronic medical records and quality of care, the patient-doctor relationship, patient engagement, self-care, self-management skills and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Mixed methods qualitative study: analyses of survey data, including content analysis of free-text answers, and quantitative-descriptive measures combined with semistructured individual interviews, patient activation measures, and member checks. SETTING: Greater Boston, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Patients cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who had electronic access to their PCP visit notes. Among those submitting surveys, 576 free-text answers were identified and analysed (414 from female patients, 162 from male patients; 23–88 years). In addition, 13 patients (9 female, 4 male; 58–87 years) were interviewed. RESULTS: Patient experiences indicate improved understanding (of health information), better relationships (with doctors), better quality (adherence and compliance; keeping track) and improved self-care (patient-centredness, empowerment). Patients want more doctors to offer access to their notes, and some wish to contribute to their generation. Those patients with repeated experience reviewing notes express fewer concerns and more perceived benefits. CONCLUSIONS: As the use of fully transparent medical records spreads, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of possible benefits or harms, and to characterise target populations that may require varying modes of delivery. Patient desires for expansion of this practice extend to specialty care and settings beyond the physician's office. Patients are also interested in becoming involved actively in the generation of their medical records. The OpenNotes movement may increase patient activation and engagement in important ways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47351372016-02-09 Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods Esch, Tobias Mejilla, Roanne Anselmo, Melissa Podtschaske, Beatrice Delbanco, Tom Walker, Jan BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: (A) To gain insights into the experiences of patients invited to view their doctors’ visit notes, with a focus on those who review multiple notes; (B) to examine the relationships among fully transparent electronic medical records and quality of care, the patient-doctor relationship, patient engagement, self-care, self-management skills and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Mixed methods qualitative study: analyses of survey data, including content analysis of free-text answers, and quantitative-descriptive measures combined with semistructured individual interviews, patient activation measures, and member checks. SETTING: Greater Boston, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Patients cared for by primary care physicians (PCPs) at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center who had electronic access to their PCP visit notes. Among those submitting surveys, 576 free-text answers were identified and analysed (414 from female patients, 162 from male patients; 23–88 years). In addition, 13 patients (9 female, 4 male; 58–87 years) were interviewed. RESULTS: Patient experiences indicate improved understanding (of health information), better relationships (with doctors), better quality (adherence and compliance; keeping track) and improved self-care (patient-centredness, empowerment). Patients want more doctors to offer access to their notes, and some wish to contribute to their generation. Those patients with repeated experience reviewing notes express fewer concerns and more perceived benefits. CONCLUSIONS: As the use of fully transparent medical records spreads, it is important to gain a deeper understanding of possible benefits or harms, and to characterise target populations that may require varying modes of delivery. Patient desires for expansion of this practice extend to specialty care and settings beyond the physician's office. Patients are also interested in becoming involved actively in the generation of their medical records. The OpenNotes movement may increase patient activation and engagement in important ways. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4735137/ /pubmed/26826154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Esch, Tobias
Mejilla, Roanne
Anselmo, Melissa
Podtschaske, Beatrice
Delbanco, Tom
Walker, Jan
Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title_full Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title_fullStr Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title_full_unstemmed Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title_short Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
title_sort engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010034
work_keys_str_mv AT eschtobias engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods
AT mejillaroanne engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods
AT anselmomelissa engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods
AT podtschaskebeatrice engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods
AT delbancotom engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods
AT walkerjan engagingpatientsthroughopennotesanevaluationusingmixedmethods