Cargando…

Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To measure test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes using cell-free fetal DNA and identify factors affecting accuracy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Freeman, Karoline, Geppert, Julia, Agbebiyi, Adeola, Uthman, Olalekan A, Madan, Jason, Clarke, Angus, Quenby, Siobhan, Clarke, Aileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26781507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010002
_version_ 1782413057813643264
author Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Freeman, Karoline
Geppert, Julia
Agbebiyi, Adeola
Uthman, Olalekan A
Madan, Jason
Clarke, Angus
Quenby, Siobhan
Clarke, Aileen
author_facet Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Freeman, Karoline
Geppert, Julia
Agbebiyi, Adeola
Uthman, Olalekan A
Madan, Jason
Clarke, Angus
Quenby, Siobhan
Clarke, Aileen
author_sort Taylor-Phillips, Sian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To measure test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes using cell-free fetal DNA and identify factors affecting accuracy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and the Cochrane Library published from 1997 to 9 February 2015, followed by weekly autoalerts until 1 April 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: English language journal articles describing case–control studies with ≥15 trisomy cases or cohort studies with ≥50 pregnant women who had been given NIPT and a reference standard. RESULTS: 41, 37 and 30 studies of 2012 publications retrieved were included in the review for Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes. Quality appraisal identified high risk of bias in included studies, funnel plots showed evidence of publication bias. Pooled sensitivity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.9% to 99.6%) for Down, 97.4% (95.8% to 98.4%) for Edwards, and 97.4% (86.1% to 99.6%) for Patau syndrome. The pooled specificity was 99.9% (99.9% to 100%) for all three trisomies. In 100 000 pregnancies in the general obstetric population we would expect 417, 89 and 40 cases of Downs, Edwards and Patau syndromes to be detected by NIPT, with 94, 154 and 42 false positive results. Sensitivity was lower in twin than singleton pregnancies, reduced by 9% for Down, 28% for Edwards and 22% for Patau syndrome. Pooled sensitivity was also lower in the first trimester of pregnancy, in studies in the general obstetric population, and in cohort studies with consecutive enrolment. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT using cell-free fetal DNA has very high sensitivity and specificity for Down syndrome, with slightly lower sensitivity for Edwards and Patau syndrome. However, it is not 100% accurate and should not be used as a final diagnosis for positive cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014014947.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47353042016-02-09 Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Taylor-Phillips, Sian Freeman, Karoline Geppert, Julia Agbebiyi, Adeola Uthman, Olalekan A Madan, Jason Clarke, Angus Quenby, Siobhan Clarke, Aileen BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To measure test accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes using cell-free fetal DNA and identify factors affecting accuracy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and the Cochrane Library published from 1997 to 9 February 2015, followed by weekly autoalerts until 1 April 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: English language journal articles describing case–control studies with ≥15 trisomy cases or cohort studies with ≥50 pregnant women who had been given NIPT and a reference standard. RESULTS: 41, 37 and 30 studies of 2012 publications retrieved were included in the review for Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes. Quality appraisal identified high risk of bias in included studies, funnel plots showed evidence of publication bias. Pooled sensitivity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.9% to 99.6%) for Down, 97.4% (95.8% to 98.4%) for Edwards, and 97.4% (86.1% to 99.6%) for Patau syndrome. The pooled specificity was 99.9% (99.9% to 100%) for all three trisomies. In 100 000 pregnancies in the general obstetric population we would expect 417, 89 and 40 cases of Downs, Edwards and Patau syndromes to be detected by NIPT, with 94, 154 and 42 false positive results. Sensitivity was lower in twin than singleton pregnancies, reduced by 9% for Down, 28% for Edwards and 22% for Patau syndrome. Pooled sensitivity was also lower in the first trimester of pregnancy, in studies in the general obstetric population, and in cohort studies with consecutive enrolment. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT using cell-free fetal DNA has very high sensitivity and specificity for Down syndrome, with slightly lower sensitivity for Edwards and Patau syndrome. However, it is not 100% accurate and should not be used as a final diagnosis for positive cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014014947. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4735304/ /pubmed/26781507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010002 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Freeman, Karoline
Geppert, Julia
Agbebiyi, Adeola
Uthman, Olalekan A
Madan, Jason
Clarke, Angus
Quenby, Siobhan
Clarke, Aileen
Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free dna for detection of down, edwards and patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26781507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010002
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorphillipssian accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT freemankaroline accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT geppertjulia accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT agbebiyiadeola accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT uthmanolalekana accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT madanjason accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarkeangus accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT quenbysiobhan accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT clarkeaileen accuracyofnoninvasiveprenataltestingusingcellfreednafordetectionofdownedwardsandpatausyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis