Cargando…

Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Reducing variability is integral in quality management. As part of the ongoing Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis Revascularisation for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS) trial, we developed a strict anaesthesia protocol to minimise fluctuations in patient parameters affect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laiwalla, Azim N, Ooi, Yinn Cher, Van De Wiele, Barbara, Ziv, Keren, Brown, Adam, Liou, Raymond, Saver, Jeffrey L, Gonzalez, Nestor R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26787251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009727
_version_ 1782413058048524288
author Laiwalla, Azim N
Ooi, Yinn Cher
Van De Wiele, Barbara
Ziv, Keren
Brown, Adam
Liou, Raymond
Saver, Jeffrey L
Gonzalez, Nestor R
author_facet Laiwalla, Azim N
Ooi, Yinn Cher
Van De Wiele, Barbara
Ziv, Keren
Brown, Adam
Liou, Raymond
Saver, Jeffrey L
Gonzalez, Nestor R
author_sort Laiwalla, Azim N
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Reducing variability is integral in quality management. As part of the ongoing Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis Revascularisation for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS) trial, we developed a strict anaesthesia protocol to minimise fluctuations in patient parameters affecting cerebral perfusion. We hypothesise that this protocol reduces the intraoperative variability of targeted monitored parameters compared to standard management. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients undergoing encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis surgery versus standard neurovascular interventions. Patients with ERSIAS had strict perioperative management that included normocapnia and intentional hypertension. Control patients received regular anaesthetic standard of care. Minute-by-minute intraoperative vitals were electronically collected. Heterogeneity of variance tests were used to compare variance across groups. Mixed-model regression analysis was performed to establish the effects of treatment group on the monitored parameters. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: 24 participants: 12 cases (53.8 years±16.7 years; 10 females) and 12 controls (51.3 years±15.2 years; 10 females). Adults aged 30–80 years, with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale <3) attributed to 70–99% intracranial stenosis of the carotid or middle cerebral artery, were considered for enrolment. Controls were matched according to age, gender and history of neurovascular intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variability of heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure and end tidal CO(2) (ETCO2) throughout surgical duration. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in the intraoperative MAP SD (4.26 vs 10.23 mm Hg; p=0.007) and ETCO2 SD (0.94 vs 1.26 mm Hg; p=0.05) between the ERSIAS and control groups. Median MAP and ETCO2 in the ERSIAS group were higher (98 mm Hg, IQR 23 vs 75 mm Hg, IQR 15; p<0.001, and 38 mm Hg, IQR 4 vs 32 mm Hg, IQR 3; p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ERSIAS anaesthesia protocol successfully reduced intraoperative fluctuations of MAP and ETCO2. The protocol also achieved normocarbia and the intended hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01819597; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47353052016-02-09 Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study Laiwalla, Azim N Ooi, Yinn Cher Van De Wiele, Barbara Ziv, Keren Brown, Adam Liou, Raymond Saver, Jeffrey L Gonzalez, Nestor R BMJ Open Anaesthesia OBJECTIVES: Reducing variability is integral in quality management. As part of the ongoing Encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis Revascularisation for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (ERSIAS) trial, we developed a strict anaesthesia protocol to minimise fluctuations in patient parameters affecting cerebral perfusion. We hypothesise that this protocol reduces the intraoperative variability of targeted monitored parameters compared to standard management. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of patients undergoing encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis surgery versus standard neurovascular interventions. Patients with ERSIAS had strict perioperative management that included normocapnia and intentional hypertension. Control patients received regular anaesthetic standard of care. Minute-by-minute intraoperative vitals were electronically collected. Heterogeneity of variance tests were used to compare variance across groups. Mixed-model regression analysis was performed to establish the effects of treatment group on the monitored parameters. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: 24 participants: 12 cases (53.8 years±16.7 years; 10 females) and 12 controls (51.3 years±15.2 years; 10 females). Adults aged 30–80 years, with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale <3) attributed to 70–99% intracranial stenosis of the carotid or middle cerebral artery, were considered for enrolment. Controls were matched according to age, gender and history of neurovascular intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variability of heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure and end tidal CO(2) (ETCO2) throughout surgical duration. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in the intraoperative MAP SD (4.26 vs 10.23 mm Hg; p=0.007) and ETCO2 SD (0.94 vs 1.26 mm Hg; p=0.05) between the ERSIAS and control groups. Median MAP and ETCO2 in the ERSIAS group were higher (98 mm Hg, IQR 23 vs 75 mm Hg, IQR 15; p<0.001, and 38 mm Hg, IQR 4 vs 32 mm Hg, IQR 3; p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ERSIAS anaesthesia protocol successfully reduced intraoperative fluctuations of MAP and ETCO2. The protocol also achieved normocarbia and the intended hypertension. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01819597; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4735305/ /pubmed/26787251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009727 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Laiwalla, Azim N
Ooi, Yinn Cher
Van De Wiele, Barbara
Ziv, Keren
Brown, Adam
Liou, Raymond
Saver, Jeffrey L
Gonzalez, Nestor R
Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title_full Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title_fullStr Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title_short Rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
title_sort rigorous anaesthesia management protocol for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis: a prospective controlled-cohort study
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26787251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009727
work_keys_str_mv AT laiwallaazimn rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT ooiyinncher rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT vandewielebarbara rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT zivkeren rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT brownadam rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT liouraymond rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT saverjeffreyl rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy
AT gonzaleznestorr rigorousanaesthesiamanagementprotocolforpatientswithintracranialarterialstenosisaprospectivecontrolledcohortstudy