Cargando…

Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hesselink, Gijs, Berben, Sivera, Beune, Thimpe, Schoonhoven, Lisette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837
_version_ 1782413061047451648
author Hesselink, Gijs
Berben, Sivera
Beune, Thimpe
Schoonhoven, Lisette
author_facet Hesselink, Gijs
Berben, Sivera
Beune, Thimpe
Schoonhoven, Lisette
author_sort Hesselink, Gijs
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsychInfo were searched for studies published between January 1990 and July 2014. We included studies evaluating interventions relevant for higher management to oversee and manage patient safety, in prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) organisations and hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Two reviewers independently selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were categorised according to study quality, setting, sample, intervention characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Of the 18 included studies, 13 (72%) were non-experimental. Nine studies (50%) reported data on the reliability and/or validity of the intervention. Eight studies (44%) reported on the feasibility of the intervention. Only 4 studies (22%) reported statistically significant effects. The use of a simulation-based training programme and well-designed incident reporting systems led to a statistically significant improvement of safety knowledge and attitudes by ED staff and an increase of incident reports within EDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the interventions included in this review (eg, anonymous incident reporting and validation of incident reports by an independent party) could provide useful input for the design of an effective tool to govern patient safety in EMS organisations and EDs. However, executives cannot rely on a robust set of evidence-based and feasible tools to govern patient safety within their emergency care organisation and in the chain of emergency care. Established strategies from other high-risk sectors need to be evaluated in emergency care settings, using an experimental design with valid outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47353182016-02-09 Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions Hesselink, Gijs Berben, Sivera Beune, Thimpe Schoonhoven, Lisette BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsychInfo were searched for studies published between January 1990 and July 2014. We included studies evaluating interventions relevant for higher management to oversee and manage patient safety, in prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) organisations and hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Two reviewers independently selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were categorised according to study quality, setting, sample, intervention characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Of the 18 included studies, 13 (72%) were non-experimental. Nine studies (50%) reported data on the reliability and/or validity of the intervention. Eight studies (44%) reported on the feasibility of the intervention. Only 4 studies (22%) reported statistically significant effects. The use of a simulation-based training programme and well-designed incident reporting systems led to a statistically significant improvement of safety knowledge and attitudes by ED staff and an increase of incident reports within EDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the interventions included in this review (eg, anonymous incident reporting and validation of incident reports by an independent party) could provide useful input for the design of an effective tool to govern patient safety in EMS organisations and EDs. However, executives cannot rely on a robust set of evidence-based and feasible tools to govern patient safety within their emergency care organisation and in the chain of emergency care. Established strategies from other high-risk sectors need to be evaluated in emergency care settings, using an experimental design with valid outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4735318/ /pubmed/26826151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Hesselink, Gijs
Berben, Sivera
Beune, Thimpe
Schoonhoven, Lisette
Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title_full Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title_fullStr Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title_full_unstemmed Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title_short Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
title_sort improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837
work_keys_str_mv AT hesselinkgijs improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT berbensivera improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT beunethimpe improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions
AT schoonhovenlisette improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions