Cargando…
Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837 |
_version_ | 1782413061047451648 |
---|---|
author | Hesselink, Gijs Berben, Sivera Beune, Thimpe Schoonhoven, Lisette |
author_facet | Hesselink, Gijs Berben, Sivera Beune, Thimpe Schoonhoven, Lisette |
author_sort | Hesselink, Gijs |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsychInfo were searched for studies published between January 1990 and July 2014. We included studies evaluating interventions relevant for higher management to oversee and manage patient safety, in prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) organisations and hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Two reviewers independently selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were categorised according to study quality, setting, sample, intervention characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Of the 18 included studies, 13 (72%) were non-experimental. Nine studies (50%) reported data on the reliability and/or validity of the intervention. Eight studies (44%) reported on the feasibility of the intervention. Only 4 studies (22%) reported statistically significant effects. The use of a simulation-based training programme and well-designed incident reporting systems led to a statistically significant improvement of safety knowledge and attitudes by ED staff and an increase of incident reports within EDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the interventions included in this review (eg, anonymous incident reporting and validation of incident reports by an independent party) could provide useful input for the design of an effective tool to govern patient safety in EMS organisations and EDs. However, executives cannot rely on a robust set of evidence-based and feasible tools to govern patient safety within their emergency care organisation and in the chain of emergency care. Established strategies from other high-risk sectors need to be evaluated in emergency care settings, using an experimental design with valid outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4735318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47353182016-02-09 Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions Hesselink, Gijs Berben, Sivera Beune, Thimpe Schoonhoven, Lisette BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To systematically review interventions that aim to improve the governance of patient safety within emergency care on effectiveness, reliability, validity and feasibility. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PsychInfo were searched for studies published between January 1990 and July 2014. We included studies evaluating interventions relevant for higher management to oversee and manage patient safety, in prehospital emergency medical service (EMS) organisations and hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Two reviewers independently selected candidate studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were categorised according to study quality, setting, sample, intervention characteristics and findings. RESULTS: Of the 18 included studies, 13 (72%) were non-experimental. Nine studies (50%) reported data on the reliability and/or validity of the intervention. Eight studies (44%) reported on the feasibility of the intervention. Only 4 studies (22%) reported statistically significant effects. The use of a simulation-based training programme and well-designed incident reporting systems led to a statistically significant improvement of safety knowledge and attitudes by ED staff and an increase of incident reports within EDs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of the interventions included in this review (eg, anonymous incident reporting and validation of incident reports by an independent party) could provide useful input for the design of an effective tool to govern patient safety in EMS organisations and EDs. However, executives cannot rely on a robust set of evidence-based and feasible tools to govern patient safety within their emergency care organisation and in the chain of emergency care. Established strategies from other high-risk sectors need to be evaluated in emergency care settings, using an experimental design with valid outcome measures to strengthen the evidence base. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4735318/ /pubmed/26826151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Hesselink, Gijs Berben, Sivera Beune, Thimpe Schoonhoven, Lisette Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title | Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title_full | Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title_fullStr | Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title_short | Improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
title_sort | improving the governance of patient safety in emergency care: a systematic review of interventions |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26826151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hesselinkgijs improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions AT berbensivera improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions AT beunethimpe improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions AT schoonhovenlisette improvingthegovernanceofpatientsafetyinemergencycareasystematicreviewofinterventions |