Cargando…

Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS

Focal demyelinated lesions, diffuse white matter (WM) damage, and gray matter (GM) atrophy influence directly the disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to identify specific characteristics of GM and WM structural networks in subjects with clinically isola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muthuraman, Muthuraman, Fleischer, Vinzenz, Kolber, Pierre, Luessi, Felix, Zipp, Frauke, Groppa, Sergiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869873
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00014
_version_ 1782413074135777280
author Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Fleischer, Vinzenz
Kolber, Pierre
Luessi, Felix
Zipp, Frauke
Groppa, Sergiu
author_facet Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Fleischer, Vinzenz
Kolber, Pierre
Luessi, Felix
Zipp, Frauke
Groppa, Sergiu
author_sort Muthuraman, Muthuraman
collection PubMed
description Focal demyelinated lesions, diffuse white matter (WM) damage, and gray matter (GM) atrophy influence directly the disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to identify specific characteristics of GM and WM structural networks in subjects with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) in comparison to patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Twenty patients with CIS, 33 with RRMS, and 40 healthy subjects were investigated using 3 T-MRI. Diffusion tensor imaging was applied, together with probabilistic tractography and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps for WM and cortical thickness correlation analysis for GM, to determine the structural connectivity patterns. A network topology analysis with the aid of graph theoretical approaches was used to characterize the network at different community levels (modularity, clustering coefficient, global, and local efficiencies). Finally, we applied support vector machines (SVM) to automatically discriminate the two groups. In comparison to CIS subjects, patients with RRMS were found to have increased modular connectivity and higher local clustering, highlighting increased local processing in both GM and WM. Both groups presented increased modularity and clustering coefficients in comparison to healthy controls. SVM algorithms achieved 97% accuracy using the clustering coefficient as classifier derived from GM and 65% using WM from probabilistic tractography and 67% from modularity of FA maps to differentiate between CIS and RRMS patients. We demonstrate a clear increase of modular and local connectivity in patients with early RRMS in comparison to CIS and healthy subjects. Based only on a single anatomic scan and without a priori information, we developed an automated and investigator-independent paradigm that can accurately discriminate between patients with these clinically similar disease entities, and could thus complement the current dissemination-in-time criteria for clinical diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47354232016-02-11 Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS Muthuraman, Muthuraman Fleischer, Vinzenz Kolber, Pierre Luessi, Felix Zipp, Frauke Groppa, Sergiu Front Neurosci Neuroscience Focal demyelinated lesions, diffuse white matter (WM) damage, and gray matter (GM) atrophy influence directly the disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to identify specific characteristics of GM and WM structural networks in subjects with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) in comparison to patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Twenty patients with CIS, 33 with RRMS, and 40 healthy subjects were investigated using 3 T-MRI. Diffusion tensor imaging was applied, together with probabilistic tractography and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps for WM and cortical thickness correlation analysis for GM, to determine the structural connectivity patterns. A network topology analysis with the aid of graph theoretical approaches was used to characterize the network at different community levels (modularity, clustering coefficient, global, and local efficiencies). Finally, we applied support vector machines (SVM) to automatically discriminate the two groups. In comparison to CIS subjects, patients with RRMS were found to have increased modular connectivity and higher local clustering, highlighting increased local processing in both GM and WM. Both groups presented increased modularity and clustering coefficients in comparison to healthy controls. SVM algorithms achieved 97% accuracy using the clustering coefficient as classifier derived from GM and 65% using WM from probabilistic tractography and 67% from modularity of FA maps to differentiate between CIS and RRMS patients. We demonstrate a clear increase of modular and local connectivity in patients with early RRMS in comparison to CIS and healthy subjects. Based only on a single anatomic scan and without a priori information, we developed an automated and investigator-independent paradigm that can accurately discriminate between patients with these clinically similar disease entities, and could thus complement the current dissemination-in-time criteria for clinical diagnosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4735423/ /pubmed/26869873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00014 Text en Copyright © 2016 Muthuraman, Fleischer, Kolber, Luessi, Zipp and Groppa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Fleischer, Vinzenz
Kolber, Pierre
Luessi, Felix
Zipp, Frauke
Groppa, Sergiu
Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title_full Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title_fullStr Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title_full_unstemmed Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title_short Structural Brain Network Characteristics Can Differentiate CIS from Early RRMS
title_sort structural brain network characteristics can differentiate cis from early rrms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26869873
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00014
work_keys_str_mv AT muthuramanmuthuraman structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms
AT fleischervinzenz structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms
AT kolberpierre structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms
AT luessifelix structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms
AT zippfrauke structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms
AT groppasergiu structuralbrainnetworkcharacteristicscandifferentiatecisfromearlyrrms