Cargando…

Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data

Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flaig, Thomas W., Potluri, Ravi C., Ng, Yvette, Todd, Mary B., Mehra, Maneesha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576
_version_ 1782413142209331200
author Flaig, Thomas W.
Potluri, Ravi C.
Ng, Yvette
Todd, Mary B.
Mehra, Maneesha
author_facet Flaig, Thomas W.
Potluri, Ravi C.
Ng, Yvette
Todd, Mary B.
Mehra, Maneesha
author_sort Flaig, Thomas W.
collection PubMed
description Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC have changed in a US‐based real‐world population. Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) (2000–2013) and EMR (2004–2013) databases were used to identify patients with an index prostate cancer diagnosis (ICD‐9 codes 185X or 233.4X) and prescription claims for an mCRPC drug (mitoxantrone, estramustine, docetaxel, sipuleucel‐T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or radium‐223). Regimen analyses for first line of therapy (LOT1), second line of therapy, and beyond were performed among cohorts based on year of first mCRPC drug usage. mCRPC drug usage and treatment duration were compared across cohorts and age groups within each cohort. The commercial claims cohort yielded 3437 evaluable patients. Most men (91%) commencing mCRPC treatment had docetaxel as LOT1 in 2010; this number had declined to 15% in 2013. In 2013, 67% and 9% of patients used abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, respectively, as LOT1. Among both commercial claims and EMR cohorts, treatment pattern changes were most pronounced in men aged >80 years, and median treatment duration for some mCRPC drugs was shorter than expected based on available clinical trial information. These results demonstrate a shift in mCRPC treatments during the past 5 years, with greater use of newer noncytotoxic treatments than docetaxel. These real‐world data aid in understanding the changing role of chemotherapy in the management of mCRPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4735776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47357762016-02-09 Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data Flaig, Thomas W. Potluri, Ravi C. Ng, Yvette Todd, Mary B. Mehra, Maneesha Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC have changed in a US‐based real‐world population. Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) (2000–2013) and EMR (2004–2013) databases were used to identify patients with an index prostate cancer diagnosis (ICD‐9 codes 185X or 233.4X) and prescription claims for an mCRPC drug (mitoxantrone, estramustine, docetaxel, sipuleucel‐T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or radium‐223). Regimen analyses for first line of therapy (LOT1), second line of therapy, and beyond were performed among cohorts based on year of first mCRPC drug usage. mCRPC drug usage and treatment duration were compared across cohorts and age groups within each cohort. The commercial claims cohort yielded 3437 evaluable patients. Most men (91%) commencing mCRPC treatment had docetaxel as LOT1 in 2010; this number had declined to 15% in 2013. In 2013, 67% and 9% of patients used abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, respectively, as LOT1. Among both commercial claims and EMR cohorts, treatment pattern changes were most pronounced in men aged >80 years, and median treatment duration for some mCRPC drugs was shorter than expected based on available clinical trial information. These results demonstrate a shift in mCRPC treatments during the past 5 years, with greater use of newer noncytotoxic treatments than docetaxel. These real‐world data aid in understanding the changing role of chemotherapy in the management of mCRPC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4735776/ /pubmed/26710718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Flaig, Thomas W.
Potluri, Ravi C.
Ng, Yvette
Todd, Mary B.
Mehra, Maneesha
Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title_full Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title_fullStr Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title_full_unstemmed Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title_short Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
title_sort treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576
work_keys_str_mv AT flaigthomasw treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata
AT potluriravic treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata
AT ngyvette treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata
AT toddmaryb treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata
AT mehramaneesha treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata