Cargando…
Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data
Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576 |
_version_ | 1782413142209331200 |
---|---|
author | Flaig, Thomas W. Potluri, Ravi C. Ng, Yvette Todd, Mary B. Mehra, Maneesha |
author_facet | Flaig, Thomas W. Potluri, Ravi C. Ng, Yvette Todd, Mary B. Mehra, Maneesha |
author_sort | Flaig, Thomas W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC have changed in a US‐based real‐world population. Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) (2000–2013) and EMR (2004–2013) databases were used to identify patients with an index prostate cancer diagnosis (ICD‐9 codes 185X or 233.4X) and prescription claims for an mCRPC drug (mitoxantrone, estramustine, docetaxel, sipuleucel‐T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or radium‐223). Regimen analyses for first line of therapy (LOT1), second line of therapy, and beyond were performed among cohorts based on year of first mCRPC drug usage. mCRPC drug usage and treatment duration were compared across cohorts and age groups within each cohort. The commercial claims cohort yielded 3437 evaluable patients. Most men (91%) commencing mCRPC treatment had docetaxel as LOT1 in 2010; this number had declined to 15% in 2013. In 2013, 67% and 9% of patients used abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, respectively, as LOT1. Among both commercial claims and EMR cohorts, treatment pattern changes were most pronounced in men aged >80 years, and median treatment duration for some mCRPC drugs was shorter than expected based on available clinical trial information. These results demonstrate a shift in mCRPC treatments during the past 5 years, with greater use of newer noncytotoxic treatments than docetaxel. These real‐world data aid in understanding the changing role of chemotherapy in the management of mCRPC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4735776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47357762016-02-09 Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data Flaig, Thomas W. Potluri, Ravi C. Ng, Yvette Todd, Mary B. Mehra, Maneesha Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Despite increasing drug treatment options for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, real‐world treatment data are lacking. We conducted retrospective analyses of commercial claims and electronic medical record (EMR) databases to understand how treatment patterns for mCRPC have changed in a US‐based real‐world population. Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) (2000–2013) and EMR (2004–2013) databases were used to identify patients with an index prostate cancer diagnosis (ICD‐9 codes 185X or 233.4X) and prescription claims for an mCRPC drug (mitoxantrone, estramustine, docetaxel, sipuleucel‐T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or radium‐223). Regimen analyses for first line of therapy (LOT1), second line of therapy, and beyond were performed among cohorts based on year of first mCRPC drug usage. mCRPC drug usage and treatment duration were compared across cohorts and age groups within each cohort. The commercial claims cohort yielded 3437 evaluable patients. Most men (91%) commencing mCRPC treatment had docetaxel as LOT1 in 2010; this number had declined to 15% in 2013. In 2013, 67% and 9% of patients used abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, respectively, as LOT1. Among both commercial claims and EMR cohorts, treatment pattern changes were most pronounced in men aged >80 years, and median treatment duration for some mCRPC drugs was shorter than expected based on available clinical trial information. These results demonstrate a shift in mCRPC treatments during the past 5 years, with greater use of newer noncytotoxic treatments than docetaxel. These real‐world data aid in understanding the changing role of chemotherapy in the management of mCRPC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4735776/ /pubmed/26710718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Flaig, Thomas W. Potluri, Ravi C. Ng, Yvette Todd, Mary B. Mehra, Maneesha Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title | Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title_full | Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title_fullStr | Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title_short | Treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
title_sort | treatment evolution for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer with recent introduction of novel agents: retrospective analysis of real‐world data |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4735776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26710718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flaigthomasw treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata AT potluriravic treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata AT ngyvette treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata AT toddmaryb treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata AT mehramaneesha treatmentevolutionformetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerwithrecentintroductionofnovelagentsretrospectiveanalysisofrealworlddata |