Cargando…
Fragmentation trees reloaded
BACKGROUND: Untargeted metabolomics commonly uses liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure abundances of metabolites; subsequent tandem mass spectrometry is used to derive information about individual compounds. One of the bottlenecks in this experimental setup is the interpretation of fra...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-016-0116-8 |
_version_ | 1782413197697875968 |
---|---|
author | Böcker, Sebastian Dührkop, Kai |
author_facet | Böcker, Sebastian Dührkop, Kai |
author_sort | Böcker, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Untargeted metabolomics commonly uses liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure abundances of metabolites; subsequent tandem mass spectrometry is used to derive information about individual compounds. One of the bottlenecks in this experimental setup is the interpretation of fragmentation spectra to accurately and efficiently identify compounds. Fragmentation trees have become a powerful tool for the interpretation of tandem mass spectrometry data of small molecules. These trees are determined from the data using combinatorial optimization, and aim at explaining the experimental data via fragmentation cascades. Fragmentation tree computation does not require spectral or structural databases. To obtain biochemically meaningful trees, one needs an elaborate optimization function (scoring). RESULTS: We present a new scoring for computing fragmentation trees, transforming the combinatorial optimization into a Maximum A Posteriori estimator. We demonstrate the superiority of the new scoring for two tasks: both for the de novo identification of molecular formulas of unknown compounds, and for searching a database for structurally similar compounds, our method SIRIUS 3, performs significantly better than the previous version of our method, as well as other methods for this task. CONCLUSION: SIRIUS 3 can be a part of an untargeted metabolomics workflow, allowing researchers to investigate unknowns using automated computational methods. [Figure: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4736045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47360452016-02-03 Fragmentation trees reloaded Böcker, Sebastian Dührkop, Kai J Cheminform Research Article BACKGROUND: Untargeted metabolomics commonly uses liquid chromatography mass spectrometry to measure abundances of metabolites; subsequent tandem mass spectrometry is used to derive information about individual compounds. One of the bottlenecks in this experimental setup is the interpretation of fragmentation spectra to accurately and efficiently identify compounds. Fragmentation trees have become a powerful tool for the interpretation of tandem mass spectrometry data of small molecules. These trees are determined from the data using combinatorial optimization, and aim at explaining the experimental data via fragmentation cascades. Fragmentation tree computation does not require spectral or structural databases. To obtain biochemically meaningful trees, one needs an elaborate optimization function (scoring). RESULTS: We present a new scoring for computing fragmentation trees, transforming the combinatorial optimization into a Maximum A Posteriori estimator. We demonstrate the superiority of the new scoring for two tasks: both for the de novo identification of molecular formulas of unknown compounds, and for searching a database for structurally similar compounds, our method SIRIUS 3, performs significantly better than the previous version of our method, as well as other methods for this task. CONCLUSION: SIRIUS 3 can be a part of an untargeted metabolomics workflow, allowing researchers to investigate unknowns using automated computational methods. [Figure: see text] Springer International Publishing 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4736045/ /pubmed/26839597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-016-0116-8 Text en © Böcker and Dührkop. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Böcker, Sebastian Dührkop, Kai Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title | Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title_full | Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title_fullStr | Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title_full_unstemmed | Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title_short | Fragmentation trees reloaded |
title_sort | fragmentation trees reloaded |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-016-0116-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bockersebastian fragmentationtreesreloaded AT duhrkopkai fragmentationtreesreloaded |