Cargando…

Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?

BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banihashemi, Sheida, Hatam, Nahid, Zand, Farid, Kharazmi, Erfan, Nasimi, Soheila, Askarian, Mehrdad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391
_version_ 1782413200193486848
author Banihashemi, Sheida
Hatam, Nahid
Zand, Farid
Kharazmi, Erfan
Nasimi, Soheila
Askarian, Mehrdad
author_facet Banihashemi, Sheida
Hatam, Nahid
Zand, Farid
Kharazmi, Erfan
Nasimi, Soheila
Askarian, Mehrdad
author_sort Banihashemi, Sheida
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools. RESULTS: In the field of patient hand-over, there was no standardized approach. In the field of the performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure. In the field of hand hygiene (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard. CONCLUSIONS: There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in all three areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve patient safety by the implementation of adapted WHO suggested actions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47360562016-02-19 Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? Banihashemi, Sheida Hatam, Nahid Zand, Farid Kharazmi, Erfan Nasimi, Soheila Askarian, Mehrdad Int J Prev Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools. RESULTS: In the field of patient hand-over, there was no standardized approach. In the field of the performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure. In the field of hand hygiene (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard. CONCLUSIONS: There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in all three areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve patient safety by the implementation of adapted WHO suggested actions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4736056/ /pubmed/26900434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Banihashemi S. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Banihashemi, Sheida
Hatam, Nahid
Zand, Farid
Kharazmi, Erfan
Nasimi, Soheila
Askarian, Mehrdad
Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title_full Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title_fullStr Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title_short Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
title_sort assessment of three “who” patient safety solutions: where do we stand and what can we do?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900434
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391
work_keys_str_mv AT banihashemisheida assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo
AT hatamnahid assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo
AT zandfarid assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo
AT kharazmierfan assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo
AT nasimisoheila assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo
AT askarianmehrdad assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo