Cargando…
Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?
BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391 |
_version_ | 1782413200193486848 |
---|---|
author | Banihashemi, Sheida Hatam, Nahid Zand, Farid Kharazmi, Erfan Nasimi, Soheila Askarian, Mehrdad |
author_facet | Banihashemi, Sheida Hatam, Nahid Zand, Farid Kharazmi, Erfan Nasimi, Soheila Askarian, Mehrdad |
author_sort | Banihashemi, Sheida |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools. RESULTS: In the field of patient hand-over, there was no standardized approach. In the field of the performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure. In the field of hand hygiene (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard. CONCLUSIONS: There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in all three areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve patient safety by the implementation of adapted WHO suggested actions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4736056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47360562016-02-19 Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? Banihashemi, Sheida Hatam, Nahid Zand, Farid Kharazmi, Erfan Nasimi, Soheila Askarian, Mehrdad Int J Prev Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards. METHODS: Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools. RESULTS: In the field of patient hand-over, there was no standardized approach. In the field of the performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure. In the field of hand hygiene (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard. CONCLUSIONS: There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in all three areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve patient safety by the implementation of adapted WHO suggested actions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4736056/ /pubmed/26900434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Banihashemi S. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Banihashemi, Sheida Hatam, Nahid Zand, Farid Kharazmi, Erfan Nasimi, Soheila Askarian, Mehrdad Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title | Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title_full | Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title_short | Assessment of Three “WHO” Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? |
title_sort | assessment of three “who” patient safety solutions: where do we stand and what can we do? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.171391 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banihashemisheida assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo AT hatamnahid assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo AT zandfarid assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo AT kharazmierfan assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo AT nasimisoheila assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo AT askarianmehrdad assessmentofthreewhopatientsafetysolutionswheredowestandandwhatcanwedo |