Cargando…

The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme

BACKGROUND: Tooth decay is the commonest disease of childhood. We have known for over 90 years that fluoride can prevent tooth decay; it is present in nearly all toothpastes and can be provided in mouthwashes, gels and varnishes. The oldest method of applying fluoride is via the water supply at a co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwin, Michaela, Emsley, Richard, Kelly, Michael, Rooney, Eric, Sutton, Matthew, Tickle, Martin, Wagstaff, Rebecca, Walsh, Tanya, Whittaker, William, Pretty, Iain A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26831505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0169-0
_version_ 1782413207106748416
author Goodwin, Michaela
Emsley, Richard
Kelly, Michael
Rooney, Eric
Sutton, Matthew
Tickle, Martin
Wagstaff, Rebecca
Walsh, Tanya
Whittaker, William
Pretty, Iain A
author_facet Goodwin, Michaela
Emsley, Richard
Kelly, Michael
Rooney, Eric
Sutton, Matthew
Tickle, Martin
Wagstaff, Rebecca
Walsh, Tanya
Whittaker, William
Pretty, Iain A
author_sort Goodwin, Michaela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tooth decay is the commonest disease of childhood. We have known for over 90 years that fluoride can prevent tooth decay; it is present in nearly all toothpastes and can be provided in mouthwashes, gels and varnishes. The oldest method of applying fluoride is via the water supply at a concentration of 1 part per million. The two most important reviews of water fluoridation in the United Kingdom (the York Review and MRC Report on water fluoridation and health) concluded that whilst there was evidence to suggest water fluoridation provided a benefit in caries reduction, there was a need to improve the evidence base in several areas. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will use a natural experiment to assess the incidence of caries in two geographical areas, one in which the water supply is returned to being fluoridated following a discontinuation of fluoridation and one that continues to have a non-fluoridated water supply. The oral health of two discrete study populations will be evaluated - those born 9 months after the water fluoridation was introduced, and those who were in their 1st year of school after the introduction of fluoridated water. Both populations will be followed prospectively for 5 years using a census approach in the exposed group along with matched numbers recruitment in a non-exposed control. Parents of the younger cohort will complete questionnaires every 6 months with child clinical examination at ages 3 and 5, whilst the older cohort will have clinical examinations only, at approximately 5, 7 and 11 years old. DISCUSSION: This project provides a unique opportunity to conduct a high quality evaluation of the reintroduction of a water fluoridation scheme, which satisfies the inclusion criteria stipulated by the York systematic review and can address the design issues identified in the MRC report. The research will make a major contribution to the understanding of the costs and effects of water fluoridation in the UK in the 21st Century. Its findings will help inform UK policy on this important public health intervention and may have a significant impact on public health policy in other developed countries. There is currently true equipoise in relation to the effectiveness of water fluoridation in contemporary populations and while the biological plausibility is well established, there is a need to examine impact on the changing epidemiological status of dental decay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47360872016-02-03 The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme Goodwin, Michaela Emsley, Richard Kelly, Michael Rooney, Eric Sutton, Matthew Tickle, Martin Wagstaff, Rebecca Walsh, Tanya Whittaker, William Pretty, Iain A BMC Oral Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Tooth decay is the commonest disease of childhood. We have known for over 90 years that fluoride can prevent tooth decay; it is present in nearly all toothpastes and can be provided in mouthwashes, gels and varnishes. The oldest method of applying fluoride is via the water supply at a concentration of 1 part per million. The two most important reviews of water fluoridation in the United Kingdom (the York Review and MRC Report on water fluoridation and health) concluded that whilst there was evidence to suggest water fluoridation provided a benefit in caries reduction, there was a need to improve the evidence base in several areas. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will use a natural experiment to assess the incidence of caries in two geographical areas, one in which the water supply is returned to being fluoridated following a discontinuation of fluoridation and one that continues to have a non-fluoridated water supply. The oral health of two discrete study populations will be evaluated - those born 9 months after the water fluoridation was introduced, and those who were in their 1st year of school after the introduction of fluoridated water. Both populations will be followed prospectively for 5 years using a census approach in the exposed group along with matched numbers recruitment in a non-exposed control. Parents of the younger cohort will complete questionnaires every 6 months with child clinical examination at ages 3 and 5, whilst the older cohort will have clinical examinations only, at approximately 5, 7 and 11 years old. DISCUSSION: This project provides a unique opportunity to conduct a high quality evaluation of the reintroduction of a water fluoridation scheme, which satisfies the inclusion criteria stipulated by the York systematic review and can address the design issues identified in the MRC report. The research will make a major contribution to the understanding of the costs and effects of water fluoridation in the UK in the 21st Century. Its findings will help inform UK policy on this important public health intervention and may have a significant impact on public health policy in other developed countries. There is currently true equipoise in relation to the effectiveness of water fluoridation in contemporary populations and while the biological plausibility is well established, there is a need to examine impact on the changing epidemiological status of dental decay. BioMed Central 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4736087/ /pubmed/26831505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0169-0 Text en © Goodwin et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Goodwin, Michaela
Emsley, Richard
Kelly, Michael
Rooney, Eric
Sutton, Matthew
Tickle, Martin
Wagstaff, Rebecca
Walsh, Tanya
Whittaker, William
Pretty, Iain A
The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title_full The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title_fullStr The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title_full_unstemmed The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title_short The CATFISH study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
title_sort catfish study protocol: an evaluation of a water fluoridation scheme
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26831505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwinmichaela thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT emsleyrichard thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT kellymichael thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT rooneyeric thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT suttonmatthew thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT ticklemartin thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT wagstaffrebecca thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT walshtanya thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT whittakerwilliam thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT prettyiaina thecatfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT goodwinmichaela catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT emsleyrichard catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT kellymichael catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT rooneyeric catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT suttonmatthew catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT ticklemartin catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT wagstaffrebecca catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT walshtanya catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT whittakerwilliam catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme
AT prettyiaina catfishstudyprotocolanevaluationofawaterfluoridationscheme