Cargando…
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the published literatures comparing the use of mechanical chest compression device and manual chest compression during cardiac arrest (CA) with respect to short-term survival outcomes and neurological function. METHODS: Database...
Autores principales: | Li, Hui, Wang, Dongping, Yu, Yi, Zhao, Xiang, Jing, Xiaoli |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26830837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0202-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compressions with the Lund Cardiac Arrest System compared with manual chest compressions
por: Beukema, M, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Tang, Lu, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients
por: Zhu, Ni, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Manual versus mechanical chest compression in in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort in emergency department patients
por: Şener, Alp, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of cardiac arrest: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing machine to human
por: Obermaier, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)