Cargando…

Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children

Fifty-six aphaereses were performed in 23 pediatric patients with malignant hematological and solid tumors, following three different protocols for PBPC mobilization and distributed as follows: A: seventeen mobilized with 4 g/m(2) of cyclophosphamide (CFA) and 10 μg/kg/day of granulocyte colony stim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez, Arellano-Galindo, José, Avalos, Armando Martínez, Mendoza-García, Emma, Jiménez-Hernández, Elva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4078215
_version_ 1782413283063496704
author Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez
Arellano-Galindo, José
Avalos, Armando Martínez
Mendoza-García, Emma
Jiménez-Hernández, Elva
author_facet Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez
Arellano-Galindo, José
Avalos, Armando Martínez
Mendoza-García, Emma
Jiménez-Hernández, Elva
author_sort Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez
collection PubMed
description Fifty-six aphaereses were performed in 23 pediatric patients with malignant hematological and solid tumors, following three different protocols for PBPC mobilization and distributed as follows: A: seventeen mobilized with 4 g/m(2) of cyclophosphamide (CFA) and 10 μg/kg/day of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), B: nineteen with CFA + G-CSF, and C: twenty only with G-CSF when the WBC count exceeded 10 × 10(9)/L. The average number of MNC/kg body weight (BW)/aphaeresis was 0.4 × 10(8) (0.1–1.4), 2.25 × 10(8) (0.56–6.28), and 1.02 × 10(8) (0.34–2.5) whereas the average number of CD34+ cells/kg BW/aphaeresis was 0.18 × 10(6)/kg (0.09–0.34), 1.04 × 10(6) (0.19–9.3), and 0.59 × 10(6) (0.17–0.87) and the count of CFU/kg BW/aphaeresis was 1.11 × 10(5) (0.31–2.12), 1.16 × 10(5) (0.64–2.97), and 1.12 × 10(5) (0.3–6.63) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The collection was better in group B versus group A (p = 0.007 and p = 0.05, resp.) and in group C versus group A (p = 0.08 and p = 0.05, resp.). The collection of PBPCs was more effective in the group mobilized with CFM + G-CSF when the WBC exceeded 10 × 10(3)/μL in terms of MNC and CD34+ cells and there was no toxicity of the chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47364312016-02-15 Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez Arellano-Galindo, José Avalos, Armando Martínez Mendoza-García, Emma Jiménez-Hernández, Elva Stem Cells Int Clinical Study Fifty-six aphaereses were performed in 23 pediatric patients with malignant hematological and solid tumors, following three different protocols for PBPC mobilization and distributed as follows: A: seventeen mobilized with 4 g/m(2) of cyclophosphamide (CFA) and 10 μg/kg/day of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), B: nineteen with CFA + G-CSF, and C: twenty only with G-CSF when the WBC count exceeded 10 × 10(9)/L. The average number of MNC/kg body weight (BW)/aphaeresis was 0.4 × 10(8) (0.1–1.4), 2.25 × 10(8) (0.56–6.28), and 1.02 × 10(8) (0.34–2.5) whereas the average number of CD34+ cells/kg BW/aphaeresis was 0.18 × 10(6)/kg (0.09–0.34), 1.04 × 10(6) (0.19–9.3), and 0.59 × 10(6) (0.17–0.87) and the count of CFU/kg BW/aphaeresis was 1.11 × 10(5) (0.31–2.12), 1.16 × 10(5) (0.64–2.97), and 1.12 × 10(5) (0.3–6.63) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The collection was better in group B versus group A (p = 0.007 and p = 0.05, resp.) and in group C versus group A (p = 0.08 and p = 0.05, resp.). The collection of PBPCs was more effective in the group mobilized with CFM + G-CSF when the WBC exceeded 10 × 10(3)/μL in terms of MNC and CD34+ cells and there was no toxicity of the chemotherapy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4736431/ /pubmed/26880960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4078215 Text en Copyright © 2016 José Eugenio Vázquez Meraz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez
Arellano-Galindo, José
Avalos, Armando Martínez
Mendoza-García, Emma
Jiménez-Hernández, Elva
Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title_full Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title_fullStr Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title_full_unstemmed Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title_short Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
title_sort stem cell mobilization with g-csf versus cyclophosphamide plus g-csf in mexican children
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4078215
work_keys_str_mv AT merazjoseeugeniovazquez stemcellmobilizationwithgcsfversuscyclophosphamideplusgcsfinmexicanchildren
AT arellanogalindojose stemcellmobilizationwithgcsfversuscyclophosphamideplusgcsfinmexicanchildren
AT avalosarmandomartinez stemcellmobilizationwithgcsfversuscyclophosphamideplusgcsfinmexicanchildren
AT mendozagarciaemma stemcellmobilizationwithgcsfversuscyclophosphamideplusgcsfinmexicanchildren
AT jimenezhernandezelva stemcellmobilizationwithgcsfversuscyclophosphamideplusgcsfinmexicanchildren