Cargando…
Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
Fifty-six aphaereses were performed in 23 pediatric patients with malignant hematological and solid tumors, following three different protocols for PBPC mobilization and distributed as follows: A: seventeen mobilized with 4 g/m(2) of cyclophosphamide (CFA) and 10 μg/kg/day of granulocyte colony stim...
Autores principales: | Meraz, José Eugenio Vázquez, Arellano-Galindo, José, Avalos, Armando Martínez, Mendoza-García, Emma, Jiménez-Hernández, Elva |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4078215 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Corrigendum to “Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children”
por: Vázquez Meraz, José Eugenio, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone
por: Sung, Anthony D., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
por: Wang, Liwen, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
PB2195: MOBILIZATION WITH CYTARABINE AND GRANULOCYTE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR (G-CSF) GIVES BETTER YIELD THAN MOBILIZATION WITH G-CSF ALONE OR COMBINED WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
por: Simeonov, S., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A randomized phase II study of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide+G-CSF or G-CSF alone after lenalidomide-based induction in multiple myeloma
por: Silvennoinen, R, et al.
Publicado: (2016)