Cargando…

Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have examined the effects of brief electrical stimulation (BES) on nerve regeneration, with some suggesting that BES accelerates facial nerve recovery. However, the facial nerve outcome measurement in these studies has not been precise or accurate. The objective of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendez, Adrian, Seikaly, Hadi, Biron, Vincent L., Zhu, Lin Fu, Côté, David W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0118-6
_version_ 1782413294693253120
author Mendez, Adrian
Seikaly, Hadi
Biron, Vincent L.
Zhu, Lin Fu
Côté, David W. J.
author_facet Mendez, Adrian
Seikaly, Hadi
Biron, Vincent L.
Zhu, Lin Fu
Côté, David W. J.
author_sort Mendez, Adrian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have examined the effects of brief electrical stimulation (BES) on nerve regeneration, with some suggesting that BES accelerates facial nerve recovery. However, the facial nerve outcome measurement in these studies has not been precise or accurate. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of BES on accelerating facial nerve functional recovery from a transection injury in the rat model. METHODS: A prospective randomized animal study using a rat model was performed. Two groups of 9 rats underwent facial nerve surgery. Both group 1 and 2 underwent facial nerve transection and repair at the main trunk of the nerve, with group 2 additionally receiving BES on post-operative day 0 for 1 h using an implantable stimulation device. Primary outcome was measured using a laser curtain model, which measured amplitude of whisking at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: At week 2, the average amplitude observed for group 1 was 4.4°. Showing a statistically significant improvement over group 1, the group 2 mean was 14.0° at 2 weeks post-operatively (p = 0.0004). At week 4, group 1 showed improvement having an average of 9.7°, while group 2 remained relatively unchanged with an average of 12.8°. Group 1 had an average amplitude of 13.63° at 6-weeks from surgery. Group 2 had a similar increase in amplitude with an average of 15.8°. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 4 and 6 weeks after facial nerve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use an implantable stimulator for serial BES following neurorrhaphy in a validated animal model. Results suggest performing BES after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy at the main trunk of the facial nerve is associated with accelerated whisker movement in a rat model compared with a control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47364862016-02-03 Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study Mendez, Adrian Seikaly, Hadi Biron, Vincent L. Zhu, Lin Fu Côté, David W. J. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies have examined the effects of brief electrical stimulation (BES) on nerve regeneration, with some suggesting that BES accelerates facial nerve recovery. However, the facial nerve outcome measurement in these studies has not been precise or accurate. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of BES on accelerating facial nerve functional recovery from a transection injury in the rat model. METHODS: A prospective randomized animal study using a rat model was performed. Two groups of 9 rats underwent facial nerve surgery. Both group 1 and 2 underwent facial nerve transection and repair at the main trunk of the nerve, with group 2 additionally receiving BES on post-operative day 0 for 1 h using an implantable stimulation device. Primary outcome was measured using a laser curtain model, which measured amplitude of whisking at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: At week 2, the average amplitude observed for group 1 was 4.4°. Showing a statistically significant improvement over group 1, the group 2 mean was 14.0° at 2 weeks post-operatively (p = 0.0004). At week 4, group 1 showed improvement having an average of 9.7°, while group 2 remained relatively unchanged with an average of 12.8°. Group 1 had an average amplitude of 13.63° at 6-weeks from surgery. Group 2 had a similar increase in amplitude with an average of 15.8°. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 4 and 6 weeks after facial nerve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use an implantable stimulator for serial BES following neurorrhaphy in a validated animal model. Results suggest performing BES after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy at the main trunk of the facial nerve is associated with accelerated whisker movement in a rat model compared with a control group. BioMed Central 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4736486/ /pubmed/26833354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0118-6 Text en © Mendez et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Mendez, Adrian
Seikaly, Hadi
Biron, Vincent L.
Zhu, Lin Fu
Côté, David W. J.
Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title_full Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title_fullStr Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title_full_unstemmed Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title_short Brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
title_sort brief electrical stimulation after facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0118-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mendezadrian briefelectricalstimulationafterfacialnervetransectionandneurorrhaphyarandomizedprospectiveanimalstudy
AT seikalyhadi briefelectricalstimulationafterfacialnervetransectionandneurorrhaphyarandomizedprospectiveanimalstudy
AT bironvincentl briefelectricalstimulationafterfacialnervetransectionandneurorrhaphyarandomizedprospectiveanimalstudy
AT zhulinfu briefelectricalstimulationafterfacialnervetransectionandneurorrhaphyarandomizedprospectiveanimalstudy
AT cotedavidwj briefelectricalstimulationafterfacialnervetransectionandneurorrhaphyarandomizedprospectiveanimalstudy