Cargando…

Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random seque...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leem, Jungtae, Park, Jimin, Han, Gajin, Eun, Seulgi, Makary, Meena M., Park, Kyungmo, Lee, Junhee, Lee, Sanghoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z
_version_ 1782413334264414208
author Leem, Jungtae
Park, Jimin
Han, Gajin
Eun, Seulgi
Makary, Meena M.
Park, Kyungmo
Lee, Junhee
Lee, Sanghoon
author_facet Leem, Jungtae
Park, Jimin
Han, Gajin
Eun, Seulgi
Makary, Meena M.
Park, Kyungmo
Lee, Junhee
Lee, Sanghoon
author_sort Leem, Jungtae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random sequence participant- and assessor-blinded trial with two parallel arms. A total of 76 participants will be randomly assigned to Group 1 or Group 2 in a 1:1 ratio. Group 1 will consist of Sham Streitberger’s needle, Real Streitberger’s needle, and Phantom acupuncture session. Group 2 will consist of Park Sham device with real needle, Park Sham device with sham needle, and no treatment session. Participants will have a total of three acupuncture sessions in a day. The primary endpoint is blinding test questionnaire 1. Secondary endpoints are the Bang’s blinding index, the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale index, and physiological data including heart rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance response. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the relevance of using placebo acupuncture devices as controls using a validation test procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0001347.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47366922016-02-03 Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial Leem, Jungtae Park, Jimin Han, Gajin Eun, Seulgi Makary, Meena M. Park, Kyungmo Lee, Junhee Lee, Sanghoon BMC Complement Altern Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random sequence participant- and assessor-blinded trial with two parallel arms. A total of 76 participants will be randomly assigned to Group 1 or Group 2 in a 1:1 ratio. Group 1 will consist of Sham Streitberger’s needle, Real Streitberger’s needle, and Phantom acupuncture session. Group 2 will consist of Park Sham device with real needle, Park Sham device with sham needle, and no treatment session. Participants will have a total of three acupuncture sessions in a day. The primary endpoint is blinding test questionnaire 1. Secondary endpoints are the Bang’s blinding index, the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale index, and physiological data including heart rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance response. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the relevance of using placebo acupuncture devices as controls using a validation test procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0001347. BioMed Central 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4736692/ /pubmed/26833219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z Text en © Leem et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Leem, Jungtae
Park, Jimin
Han, Gajin
Eun, Seulgi
Makary, Meena M.
Park, Kyungmo
Lee, Junhee
Lee, Sanghoon
Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title_full Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title_fullStr Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title_short Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
title_sort evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z
work_keys_str_mv AT leemjungtae evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT parkjimin evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT hangajin evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT eunseulgi evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT makarymeenam evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT parkkyungmo evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT leejunhee evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial
AT leesanghoon evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial