Cargando…
Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random seque...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z |
_version_ | 1782413334264414208 |
---|---|
author | Leem, Jungtae Park, Jimin Han, Gajin Eun, Seulgi Makary, Meena M. Park, Kyungmo Lee, Junhee Lee, Sanghoon |
author_facet | Leem, Jungtae Park, Jimin Han, Gajin Eun, Seulgi Makary, Meena M. Park, Kyungmo Lee, Junhee Lee, Sanghoon |
author_sort | Leem, Jungtae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random sequence participant- and assessor-blinded trial with two parallel arms. A total of 76 participants will be randomly assigned to Group 1 or Group 2 in a 1:1 ratio. Group 1 will consist of Sham Streitberger’s needle, Real Streitberger’s needle, and Phantom acupuncture session. Group 2 will consist of Park Sham device with real needle, Park Sham device with sham needle, and no treatment session. Participants will have a total of three acupuncture sessions in a day. The primary endpoint is blinding test questionnaire 1. Secondary endpoints are the Bang’s blinding index, the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale index, and physiological data including heart rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance response. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the relevance of using placebo acupuncture devices as controls using a validation test procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0001347. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4736692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47366922016-02-03 Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial Leem, Jungtae Park, Jimin Han, Gajin Eun, Seulgi Makary, Meena M. Park, Kyungmo Lee, Junhee Lee, Sanghoon BMC Complement Altern Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although various placebo acupuncture devices have been developed and used in acupuncture research, there is controversy concerning whether these devices really serve as appropriate placebos for control groups. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a single-center prospective random sequence participant- and assessor-blinded trial with two parallel arms. A total of 76 participants will be randomly assigned to Group 1 or Group 2 in a 1:1 ratio. Group 1 will consist of Sham Streitberger’s needle, Real Streitberger’s needle, and Phantom acupuncture session. Group 2 will consist of Park Sham device with real needle, Park Sham device with sham needle, and no treatment session. Participants will have a total of three acupuncture sessions in a day. The primary endpoint is blinding test questionnaire 1. Secondary endpoints are the Bang’s blinding index, the Massachusetts General Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale index, and physiological data including heart rate, heart rate variability, and skin conductance response. DISCUSSION: This trial will evaluate the relevance of using placebo acupuncture devices as controls using a validation test procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0001347. BioMed Central 2016-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4736692/ /pubmed/26833219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z Text en © Leem et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Leem, Jungtae Park, Jimin Han, Gajin Eun, Seulgi Makary, Meena M. Park, Kyungmo Lee, Junhee Lee, Sanghoon Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title | Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title_full | Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title_short | Evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
title_sort | evaluating validity of various acupuncture device types: a random sequence clinical trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1026-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemjungtae evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT parkjimin evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT hangajin evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT eunseulgi evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT makarymeenam evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT parkkyungmo evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT leejunhee evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial AT leesanghoon evaluatingvalidityofvariousacupuncturedevicetypesarandomsequenceclinicaltrial |