Cargando…
Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review
OBJECTIVE: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens’ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. DATA SOURCES: We performed this systematic review on the English language liter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26481748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.167360 |
_version_ | 1782413369152634880 |
---|---|
author | Miao, Xia-Yi Ji, Xiao-Bin Lu, Hai-Wen Yang, Jia-Wei Xu, Jin-Fu |
author_facet | Miao, Xia-Yi Ji, Xiao-Bin Lu, Hai-Wen Yang, Jia-Wei Xu, Jin-Fu |
author_sort | Miao, Xia-Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens’ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. DATA SOURCES: We performed this systematic review on the English language literatures from 1966 to July 2014, using various search terms included “pathogens” or “bacteria” or “microbiology” and “bronchiectasis” or “non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis” or “non-CF bronchiectasis” or “NCFB.” STUDY SELECTION: We included studies of patients with the confirmed non-CF bronchiectasis for which culture methods were required to sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Weighted mean isolation rates for Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Moxarella catarrhails were compared according to different methodology. RESULTS: The total mean bacterial culture positive rates were 63%. For studies using sputum samples, the mean positive culture rates were 74%. For studies using BALF alone or BALF and sputum, it was 48%. The distributions of main bacterial strains were 29% for H. influenzae, 28% for P. aeruginosa, 11% for S. pneumoniae, 12% for S. aureus, and 8% for M. catarrhails with methodology of sputum. Meanwhile, the bacterial distributions were 37% for H. influenzae, 8% for P. aeruginosa, 14% for S. pneumoniae, 5% for S. aureus, and 10% for M. catarrhails with methodology of BALF alone or BALF and sputum. Analysis of the effect of different methodology on the isolation rates revealed some statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: H. influenzae accounted for the highest percentage in different methodology. Our results suggested that the total positive culture rates and the proportion of P. aeruginosa from sputum and BALF specimens had significant differences, which can be used in further appropriate recommendations for the treatment of non-CF bronchiectasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4736878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47368782016-04-04 Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review Miao, Xia-Yi Ji, Xiao-Bin Lu, Hai-Wen Yang, Jia-Wei Xu, Jin-Fu Chin Med J (Engl) Review Article OBJECTIVE: Noncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens’ distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. DATA SOURCES: We performed this systematic review on the English language literatures from 1966 to July 2014, using various search terms included “pathogens” or “bacteria” or “microbiology” and “bronchiectasis” or “non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis” or “non-CF bronchiectasis” or “NCFB.” STUDY SELECTION: We included studies of patients with the confirmed non-CF bronchiectasis for which culture methods were required to sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Weighted mean isolation rates for Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Moxarella catarrhails were compared according to different methodology. RESULTS: The total mean bacterial culture positive rates were 63%. For studies using sputum samples, the mean positive culture rates were 74%. For studies using BALF alone or BALF and sputum, it was 48%. The distributions of main bacterial strains were 29% for H. influenzae, 28% for P. aeruginosa, 11% for S. pneumoniae, 12% for S. aureus, and 8% for M. catarrhails with methodology of sputum. Meanwhile, the bacterial distributions were 37% for H. influenzae, 8% for P. aeruginosa, 14% for S. pneumoniae, 5% for S. aureus, and 10% for M. catarrhails with methodology of BALF alone or BALF and sputum. Analysis of the effect of different methodology on the isolation rates revealed some statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: H. influenzae accounted for the highest percentage in different methodology. Our results suggested that the total positive culture rates and the proportion of P. aeruginosa from sputum and BALF specimens had significant differences, which can be used in further appropriate recommendations for the treatment of non-CF bronchiectasis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4736878/ /pubmed/26481748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.167360 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Miao, Xia-Yi Ji, Xiao-Bin Lu, Hai-Wen Yang, Jia-Wei Xu, Jin-Fu Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title | Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | distribution of major pathogens from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26481748 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.167360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miaoxiayi distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview AT jixiaobin distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview AT luhaiwen distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview AT yangjiawei distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview AT xujinfu distributionofmajorpathogensfromsputumandbronchoalveolarlavagefluidinpatientswithnoncysticfibrosisbronchiectasisasystematicreview |