Cargando…

  Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience

Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Römmele, C., Brueckner, J., Messmann, H., Gölder, S. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053
_version_ 1782413375424167936
author Römmele, C.
Brueckner, J.
Messmann, H.
Gölder, S. K.
author_facet Römmele, C.
Brueckner, J.
Messmann, H.
Gölder, S. K.
author_sort Römmele, C.
collection PubMed
description Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47369052016-02-15   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience Römmele, C. Brueckner, J. Messmann, H. Gölder, S. K. Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. In patients with known or suspected risk factors for gastrointestinal stenosis, the PillCam patency capsule (PC) is given before a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in order to minimize the risk of capsule retention (CR). CR is considered unlikely upon excretion of the PC within 30 hours, excretion in an undamaged state after 30 hours, or radiological projection to the colon. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 38 patients with risk factors for CR, who received a PC from 02/2013 to 04/2015 at Klinikum Augsburg. Results. Sixteen of our 38 patients observed a natural excretion after a mean time of 34 hours past ingestion. However, only 8 patients observed excretion within 30 hours, as recommended by the company. In 20 patients passage of the PC into the colon was shown via RFID-scan or radiological imaging (after 33 and 45 hours, resp.). Only 2 patients showed a pathologic PC result. In consequence, 32 patients received the VCE; no CR was observed. Conclusion. Our data indicates that a VCE could safely be performed even if the PC excretion time is longer than 30 hours and the excreted PC was not screened for damage. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4736905/ /pubmed/26880902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053 Text en Copyright © 2016 C. Römmele et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Römmele, C.
Brueckner, J.
Messmann, H.
Gölder, S. K.
  Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_full   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_fullStr   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_full_unstemmed   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_short   Clinical Experience with the PillCam Patency Capsule prior to Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Real-World Experience
title_sort   clinical experience with the pillcam patency capsule prior to video capsule endoscopy: a real-world experience
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9657053
work_keys_str_mv AT rommelec clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT bruecknerj clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT messmannh clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience
AT goldersk clinicalexperiencewiththepillcampatencycapsulepriortovideocapsuleendoscopyarealworldexperience