Cargando…

Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size

Butterfly eyespots are known to function in predator deflection and predator intimidation, but it is still unclear what factors cause eyespots to serve one function over the other. Both functions have been demonstrated in different species that varied in eyespot size, eyespot number and wing size, l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Sebastian, Schachat, Sandra R., Piel, William H., Monteiro, Antónia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150614
_version_ 1782413384481767424
author Ho, Sebastian
Schachat, Sandra R.
Piel, William H.
Monteiro, Antónia
author_facet Ho, Sebastian
Schachat, Sandra R.
Piel, William H.
Monteiro, Antónia
author_sort Ho, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Butterfly eyespots are known to function in predator deflection and predator intimidation, but it is still unclear what factors cause eyespots to serve one function over the other. Both functions have been demonstrated in different species that varied in eyespot size, eyespot number and wing size, leaving the contribution of each of these factors to butterfly survival unclear. Here, we study how each of these factors contributes to eyespot function by using paper butterfly models, where each factor is varied in turn, and exposing these models to predation in the field. We find that the presence of multiple, small eyespots results in high predation, whereas single large eyespots (larger than 6 mm in diameter) results in low predation. These data indicate that single large eyespots intimidate predators, whereas multiple small eyespots produce a conspicuous, but non-intimidating signal to predators. We propose that eyespots may gain an intimidation function by increasing in size. Our measurements of eyespot size in 255 nymphalid butterfly species show that large eyespots are relatively rare and occur predominantly on ventral wing surfaces. By mapping eyespot size on the phylogeny of the family Nymphalidae, we show that these large eyespots, with a potential intimidation function, are dispersed throughout multiple nymphalid lineages, indicating that phylogeny is not a strong predictor of eyespot size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4736945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47369452016-02-23 Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size Ho, Sebastian Schachat, Sandra R. Piel, William H. Monteiro, Antónia R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Butterfly eyespots are known to function in predator deflection and predator intimidation, but it is still unclear what factors cause eyespots to serve one function over the other. Both functions have been demonstrated in different species that varied in eyespot size, eyespot number and wing size, leaving the contribution of each of these factors to butterfly survival unclear. Here, we study how each of these factors contributes to eyespot function by using paper butterfly models, where each factor is varied in turn, and exposing these models to predation in the field. We find that the presence of multiple, small eyespots results in high predation, whereas single large eyespots (larger than 6 mm in diameter) results in low predation. These data indicate that single large eyespots intimidate predators, whereas multiple small eyespots produce a conspicuous, but non-intimidating signal to predators. We propose that eyespots may gain an intimidation function by increasing in size. Our measurements of eyespot size in 255 nymphalid butterfly species show that large eyespots are relatively rare and occur predominantly on ventral wing surfaces. By mapping eyespot size on the phylogeny of the family Nymphalidae, we show that these large eyespots, with a potential intimidation function, are dispersed throughout multiple nymphalid lineages, indicating that phylogeny is not a strong predictor of eyespot size. The Royal Society Publishing 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4736945/ /pubmed/26909190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150614 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2016 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Ho, Sebastian
Schachat, Sandra R.
Piel, William H.
Monteiro, Antónia
Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title_full Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title_fullStr Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title_full_unstemmed Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title_short Attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
title_sort attack risk for butterflies changes with eyespot number and size
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4736945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150614
work_keys_str_mv AT hosebastian attackriskforbutterflieschangeswitheyespotnumberandsize
AT schachatsandrar attackriskforbutterflieschangeswitheyespotnumberandsize
AT pielwilliamh attackriskforbutterflieschangeswitheyespotnumberandsize
AT monteiroantonia attackriskforbutterflieschangeswitheyespotnumberandsize