Cargando…

Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is used emergently to dissolve thrombi in the treatment of fulminant pulmonary embolism. Currently, there is a relative contraindication to tPA in the setting of traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation > 10 minutes because of the risk of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousuf, Tariq, Brinton, Taylor, Ahmed, Khansa, Iskander, Joy, Woznicka, Daniel, Kramer, Jason, Kopiec, Adam, Chadaga, Amar R., Ortiz, Kathia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858790
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2452w
_version_ 1782413403440021504
author Yousuf, Tariq
Brinton, Taylor
Ahmed, Khansa
Iskander, Joy
Woznicka, Daniel
Kramer, Jason
Kopiec, Adam
Chadaga, Amar R.
Ortiz, Kathia
author_facet Yousuf, Tariq
Brinton, Taylor
Ahmed, Khansa
Iskander, Joy
Woznicka, Daniel
Kramer, Jason
Kopiec, Adam
Chadaga, Amar R.
Ortiz, Kathia
author_sort Yousuf, Tariq
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is used emergently to dissolve thrombi in the treatment of fulminant pulmonary embolism. Currently, there is a relative contraindication to tPA in the setting of traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation > 10 minutes because of the risk of massive hemorrhage. METHODS: Our single-center, retrospective study investigated patients experiencing cardiac arrest (CA) secondary to pulmonary embolus. We compared the effectiveness of advanced cardiac life support with the administration of tPA vs. the standard of care consisting of advanced cardiac life support without thrombolysis. The primary endpoint was survival to discharge. Secondary endpoints were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), major bleeding, and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We analyzed 42 patients, of whom 19 received tPA during CA. Patients who received tPA were not associated with a statistically significant increase in survival to discharge (10.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 1.00) or ROSC (47.4% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.98) compared to the control group. We observed no statistically significant difference between the groups in major bleeding events (5.3% in the tPA group vs. 4.3% in the control group, P = 1.00) and minor bleeding events (10.5% in the tPA group vs. 0.0% in the control group, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: This study did not find a statistically significant difference in survival to discharge or in ROSC in patients treated with tPA during CA compared to patients treated with standard therapy. However, because no significant difference was found in major or minor bleeding, we suggest that the potential therapeutic benefits of this medication should not be limited by the potential for massive hemorrhage. Larger prospective studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety profile of thrombolytic use in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47370282016-02-08 Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism Yousuf, Tariq Brinton, Taylor Ahmed, Khansa Iskander, Joy Woznicka, Daniel Kramer, Jason Kopiec, Adam Chadaga, Amar R. Ortiz, Kathia J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is used emergently to dissolve thrombi in the treatment of fulminant pulmonary embolism. Currently, there is a relative contraindication to tPA in the setting of traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation > 10 minutes because of the risk of massive hemorrhage. METHODS: Our single-center, retrospective study investigated patients experiencing cardiac arrest (CA) secondary to pulmonary embolus. We compared the effectiveness of advanced cardiac life support with the administration of tPA vs. the standard of care consisting of advanced cardiac life support without thrombolysis. The primary endpoint was survival to discharge. Secondary endpoints were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), major bleeding, and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We analyzed 42 patients, of whom 19 received tPA during CA. Patients who received tPA were not associated with a statistically significant increase in survival to discharge (10.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 1.00) or ROSC (47.4% vs. 47.8%, P = 0.98) compared to the control group. We observed no statistically significant difference between the groups in major bleeding events (5.3% in the tPA group vs. 4.3% in the control group, P = 1.00) and minor bleeding events (10.5% in the tPA group vs. 0.0% in the control group, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: This study did not find a statistically significant difference in survival to discharge or in ROSC in patients treated with tPA during CA compared to patients treated with standard therapy. However, because no significant difference was found in major or minor bleeding, we suggest that the potential therapeutic benefits of this medication should not be limited by the potential for massive hemorrhage. Larger prospective studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety profile of thrombolytic use in this population. Elmer Press 2016-03 2016-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4737028/ /pubmed/26858790 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2452w Text en Copyright 2016, Yousuf et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yousuf, Tariq
Brinton, Taylor
Ahmed, Khansa
Iskander, Joy
Woznicka, Daniel
Kramer, Jason
Kopiec, Adam
Chadaga, Amar R.
Ortiz, Kathia
Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title_full Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title_fullStr Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title_short Tissue Plasminogen Activator Use in Cardiac Arrest Secondary to Fulminant Pulmonary Embolism
title_sort tissue plasminogen activator use in cardiac arrest secondary to fulminant pulmonary embolism
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26858790
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2452w
work_keys_str_mv AT yousuftariq tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT brintontaylor tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT ahmedkhansa tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT iskanderjoy tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT woznickadaniel tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT kramerjason tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT kopiecadam tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT chadagaamarr tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism
AT ortizkathia tissueplasminogenactivatoruseincardiacarrestsecondarytofulminantpulmonaryembolism