Cargando…

Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study

Motor fMRI studies, comparing dominant (DH) and nondominant (NDH) hand activations have reported mixed findings, especially for the extent of ipsilateral (IL) activations and their relationship with task complexity. To date, no study has directly compared DH and NDH activations using an event‐relate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alahmadi, Adnan A.S., Pardini, Matteo, Samson, Rebecca S., D'Angelo, Egidio, Friston, Karl J., Toosy, Ahmed T., Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26415818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22997
_version_ 1782413416728625152
author Alahmadi, Adnan A.S.
Pardini, Matteo
Samson, Rebecca S.
D'Angelo, Egidio
Friston, Karl J.
Toosy, Ahmed T.
Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M.
author_facet Alahmadi, Adnan A.S.
Pardini, Matteo
Samson, Rebecca S.
D'Angelo, Egidio
Friston, Karl J.
Toosy, Ahmed T.
Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M.
author_sort Alahmadi, Adnan A.S.
collection PubMed
description Motor fMRI studies, comparing dominant (DH) and nondominant (NDH) hand activations have reported mixed findings, especially for the extent of ipsilateral (IL) activations and their relationship with task complexity. To date, no study has directly compared DH and NDH activations using an event‐related visually guided dynamic power‐grip paradigm with parametric (three) forces (GF) in healthy right‐handed subjects. We implemented a hierarchical statistical approach aimed to: (i) identify the main effect networks engaged when using either hand; (ii) characterise DH/NDH responses at different GFs; (iii) assess contralateral (CL)/IL‐specific and hemisphere‐specific activations. Beyond confirming previously reported results, this study demonstrated that increasing GF has an effect on motor response that is contextualised also by the use of DH or NDH. Linear analysis revealed increased activations in sensorimotor areas, with additional increased recruitments of subcortical and cerebellar areas when using the NDH. When looking at CL/IL‐specific activations, CL sensorimotor areas and IL cerebellum were activated with both hands. When performing the task with the NDH, several areas were also recruited including the CL cerebellum. Finally, there were hand‐side‐independent activations of nonmotor‐specific areas in the right and left hemispheres, with the right hemisphere being involved more extensively in sensori‐motor integration through associative areas while the left hemisphere showing greater activation at higher GF. This study shows that the functional networks subtending DH/NDH power‐grip visuomotor functions are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct and this should be taken into consideration when performing fMRI studies, particularly when planning interventions in patients with specific impairments. Hum Brain Mapp 36:5079–5100, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4737094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47370942016-02-11 Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study Alahmadi, Adnan A.S. Pardini, Matteo Samson, Rebecca S. D'Angelo, Egidio Friston, Karl J. Toosy, Ahmed T. Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Motor fMRI studies, comparing dominant (DH) and nondominant (NDH) hand activations have reported mixed findings, especially for the extent of ipsilateral (IL) activations and their relationship with task complexity. To date, no study has directly compared DH and NDH activations using an event‐related visually guided dynamic power‐grip paradigm with parametric (three) forces (GF) in healthy right‐handed subjects. We implemented a hierarchical statistical approach aimed to: (i) identify the main effect networks engaged when using either hand; (ii) characterise DH/NDH responses at different GFs; (iii) assess contralateral (CL)/IL‐specific and hemisphere‐specific activations. Beyond confirming previously reported results, this study demonstrated that increasing GF has an effect on motor response that is contextualised also by the use of DH or NDH. Linear analysis revealed increased activations in sensorimotor areas, with additional increased recruitments of subcortical and cerebellar areas when using the NDH. When looking at CL/IL‐specific activations, CL sensorimotor areas and IL cerebellum were activated with both hands. When performing the task with the NDH, several areas were also recruited including the CL cerebellum. Finally, there were hand‐side‐independent activations of nonmotor‐specific areas in the right and left hemispheres, with the right hemisphere being involved more extensively in sensori‐motor integration through associative areas while the left hemisphere showing greater activation at higher GF. This study shows that the functional networks subtending DH/NDH power‐grip visuomotor functions are qualitatively and quantitatively distinct and this should be taken into consideration when performing fMRI studies, particularly when planning interventions in patients with specific impairments. Hum Brain Mapp 36:5079–5100, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4737094/ /pubmed/26415818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22997 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Alahmadi, Adnan A.S.
Pardini, Matteo
Samson, Rebecca S.
D'Angelo, Egidio
Friston, Karl J.
Toosy, Ahmed T.
Gandini Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M.
Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title_full Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title_fullStr Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title_full_unstemmed Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title_short Differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: An FMRI study
title_sort differential involvement of cortical and cerebellar areas using dominant and nondominant hands: an fmri study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4737094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26415818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22997
work_keys_str_mv AT alahmadiadnanas differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT pardinimatteo differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT samsonrebeccas differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT dangeloegidio differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT fristonkarlj differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT toosyahmedt differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy
AT gandiniwheelerkingshottclaudiaam differentialinvolvementofcorticalandcerebellarareasusingdominantandnondominanthandsanfmristudy